MajG wrote:
NOT True. A Fraud machine counted more votes for the Basement dwelling imposter. A big winning percentage of people over 14 can see that.
Too many examples of blatant cheating, if paying attention.
Illegal shenanigans at state gov level clear if the rest isn't-Yet.
Only a complete fool would think the OLD fool basement dweller got honestly elected.
I remember reading a post alleging voter fraud, several months ago. It claimed to have information backed by several "PhD" "statisticians". But it did not name any of them! I've studied statistics in college and in graduate school, a total of 3 or 4 semesters, and the numbers in the post looked bogus to me. And the post wasn't even written well. This has generally been my experience in nearly all things that allege voter fraud; it looks like people are just making up stuff. The real voter fraud cases, named and prosecuted, which I've read about, have included 2 or 3 Republicans in Pennsylvania casting votes for dead family members. There have been very few substantiated voter fraud cases and most of them are fraud done by Republican voters.
There are other kinds of fraud or wrongdoing in elections. They are done by election officials. (So that's not "voter fraud", because it's not the voters who do it, it's the election officials who do it. Sometimes that's called "electioneering" fraud.) That's usually done by Republican officials to benefit Republican candidates; the investigative reporter Greg Palast has been writing bestseller books about that (including information about _false_ allegations of massive "voter fraud" -- allegations which he and his team debunked) for several years. So far I haven't heard of any real fraud in elections that would disadvantage Trump. Most of the fraud that _does_ occur works to the advantage of Republican candidates. The one big exception that I know about or think occurred, done by a Democrat (not Republican) official, was in a Democratic primary election in one state. Greg Palast includes that as one chapter in one of his recent books. That wrongdoing gave advantage to one Democratic candidate over another Democratic candidate, in a primary election in one state. The book that includes that chapter is _How Trump Stole 2020_. The book's title was intended as a warning.
Recently I read the following:
"In any event, once [Lee] Holmes started checking on hundreds of names, he found no credible evidence of fraud. [That's Lee Holmes, Senator Lindsay Graham's chief counsel on the Judiciary Committee, who had been with Graham for seven years. He was examining this data on or soon after Jan. 4, 2020.]
"Robert Drakeford, for example, was 88 years old, and got a ballot on September 18. The ballot was returned five days later. He died on November 2, according to the document. [The document is something attorney Rudy Giuliani had sent to Graham.]. Another old person had voted and died, proving nothing even if the document was accurate.
"But Giuliani had said in his memo to Graham that the data was 'definitive'. It was a reckless claim.
"Holmes was stunned at the blatant discrepancies in Giuliani's submission. As best he could tell, nearly all of the 789 dead people who allegedly voted in Georgia had properly received their ballots before they died. ...
"... It was laughable. Holmes could see why the Georgia courts had rejected Trump's claims."
(Reference: pp 216-217 of _Peril_, by Bob Woodward and Robert Costa.)
"Holmes found the sloppiness, the overbearing tone of certainty, and the inconsistencies disqualifying. The three memos added up to nothing.
"...
"Holmes reported to Graham that the data in the memos were a concoction, with a bullying tone and eighth grade writing.
"Graham looked over the memos.
"'Third grade,' he said. Holmes said part of the claim was based on an affidavit.
"Graham said, 'I can get an affidavit tomorrow saying the world is flat.'"
(Reference: p221, Ibid.)
You mentioned "basement" twice in your post. But you didn't say why any basement would be relevant here.