maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee

Would that be the same as 80 million Biden voters think the election was fair? Works both ways...there are many who voted for Biden that believe the election was rigged.
Answer me this...how many people objecting to the election does it take to investigate election fraud? Polls say 68% of Trump supporters believe the election was rigged. That's 47,600,000 people that believe the election is invalid. So, how many people warrant an investigation? Is that not enough. Who says what is enough anyway?
I DO believe the SC acted to prevent violence because under investigation, the election results would be overturned and the left would declare war! Doesn't make it right, does it?

roy

Slo Joe will be the last one standing ,wait and see.

America 1 Loc: South Miami

What will you do with the money from selling that crystal ball?

Big Kahuna

Slow Joe might be standing as a stuffed puppet with ovommit pulling all the strings to keep him upright. Unfortunately ovommit himself will be pleading that he doesn't get the short role 1st, the treasonous SOB.

Big Kahuna

Roy should cut that crystal ball into 30 million pieces and give a little piece to every one of Slo Joe's legal voters that tried to vote Slo Joe in.

kemmer

In over 50 court cases, no evidence has turned up. Because there ain't none.

Carol Kelly

Ditto. My sentiments exactly. Courts were loaded by Obama the Jerk.

Kickaha Loc: Nebraska

There have been thousands of affidavits alleging irregularities and outright fraud in this election. There are apparently problems with the Dominion machines, as is proven in Antrim county Michigan and with them in Georgia. Admittedly, it is only a small number of machines that have been proven to have been flawed. But it has been 100% of machines tested that have been proven compromised. It is hard to believe that they are the only machines with problems. That high of a failure rate calls for an audit of all Dominion machines to determine whether they are all unreliable or not. It could show whether these errors were from a flaw in the design or from deliberate manipulation. If it is a design flaw, the machines should be removed from service and never used again. If it was from deliberate manipulation, those responsible should not just be imprisoned, they should be buried under the prison.
We need to investigate all of the allegations. If fraud is found, those responsible should be prosecuted and, if proven guilty, should get the maximum sentence under the law. If fraud is found, it needs to be determined the extent of the fraud. If the amount of fraud is insufficient to overturn the election, fine, we will inaugurate Biden. If the fraud is sufficient to overturn the election, we will reinaugurate Trump. Either way, we will know that the right candidate was fairly inaugurated. Those suspected of any fraud should be prosecuted and, if found guilty, receive the maximum sentence under the law. It would also reaffirm our faith in the integrity of our elections and bring about the healing this country so desperately needs.

bggamers Loc: georgia

thats because they are chicken shits and or OBAMA judges or both

Radiance3

===============
The Justice system in unison for the Deep State, then we will see that applying the constitution on Jan 6th. Their dereliction of duty does not stand in the constitution.

America 1 Loc: South Miami

Ever since sniff sniff used the word ain't usage has come alive, however:
Is ain't a word?:
Although widely disapproved as nonstandard, and more common in the habitual speech of the less educated,
ain't is flourishing in American English.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ain%27t

jelun

Would you explain what you think having standing means?
Have you forgotten that when judges asked plaintiffs for evidence there was none? Cases were not denied simply for standing. When the Trump campaign sued appropriately their representation had no case to present that factually demonstrated their position.

jelun

I am guessing that just like Trump's campaign in court you are all supposition and no evidence.
Can you demonstrate facts that support your position?

Kickaha Loc: Nebraska

There are steps to be followed in any court case.
1) A plaintiff files a complaint to initiate a case. If the court accepts the complaint it goes to the second step.
2) The defendant files an answer to the complaint.
3) The judge issues a scheduling order laying out time tables of important dates and deadlines.
4) The parties engage in discovery.
5) Motions are filed.
6) If called for, a jury is selected. The trial begins.
7) The judge (or jury, if there is one) issues a verdict.
8) The losing party has the right to appeal the verdict. This can continue up the appellate court levels until all routes of appeal have been exhausted or the losing party gives up the challenges.
This has not occurred in these challenges. The courts have been rejecting the cases for a variety of reasons, but none of them have reached the point to present evidence.

ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island

Would you explain what you think having standing means?
Certainly - Ready?
Standing is the ability of a party to bring a lawsuit in court based upon their stake in the outcome. A party seeking to demonstrate standing must be able to show the court sufficient connection to and harm from the law or action challenged.

The word “standing” nowhere appears in the Constitution. There is compelling evidence to demonstrate it was birthed by big-government Justices during the FDR Administration to shield New Deal legislation, and to insulate the Administrative State from challenges by the People.

In truth, Texas did make such a showing. When Pennsylvania violated the exclusive authority bestowed on state legislators in the Constitution’s Electors Clause, it opened the door to corruption and foreign intrigue to corrupt the electoral votes of Pennsylvania.

What happens in Pennsylvania does not stay in Pennsylvania, as electors from all States acting together select the President of the United States.

Have you forgotten that when judges asked plaintiffs for evidence there was none?
Wrong. No courts yet have actually held a hearing in which facts are presented as evidence supporting the charge of election fraud. Hopefully this will change on Wednesday if Pence or his replacement calls for a hearing on election fraud prior to the electoral count, and or the DNI report, or Durham report is unveiled before congress. Let the record show foreign interference and fraudulent manipulation of the election count. Then, after all this evidence is presented to each member of congress, let them go on record and vote and be held accountable to the American public, and face the consequences of their vote. Look up the definition of Treason, and the consequences thereof.