Kevyn wrote:
Courts deal in facts and evidence, not beliefs and fairytales. Just because you believe in the boogyman or Santa claws won’t get you into court for a trial, it takes real evidence. Why do you think none of Trumps lawyers were sworn in when they presented their conspiracy theory’s to state legislatures?
No judge allowed the complaints to get past the pleading stage in which presentation of evidence is not necessary for litigation to proceed. These were all summary dismissals and did not allow the discovery process to go forward.
When a judge dismisses a complaint without proceeding to discovery where evidence is first introduced, it doesn't magically make all the evidence disappear.
The evidence of v***r f***d is, in fact and law, massive. And the fact that fraud occurred primarily in the swing states is a red f**g that cannot be ignored.
SCOTUS never reviewed a single complaint. Out of cowardice, they based their decision on the premise alone. The chief justice should be tarred and feathered, he and his cohorts just destroyed the highest court in the land.
FYI: Who appointed these judges is irrelevant.
Denial is a b*tch, isn't it?
ACP45 wrote:
This was the statement issued by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) late Friday, after a federal judge dismissed the lawsuit he and others filed against Vice President Mike Pence.
Can anyone tell me if any e******n f***d lawsuit brought by anyone, has actually been heard by a court, with evidence actually presented for any court to rule upon? The answer I believe is a definitive "NO".
Which brings up the the real issue of the legal process and the rule of law in this country. 70 million plus v**ers believe that there is ample evidence of v***r f***d, and NO Court wants to hear the evidence.
Friends, we have a situation that is reaching the boiling point. Many people are waiting, and hoping that the legal process will resolve this issue peacefully. We are still waiting!
This was the statement issued by Rep. Louie Gohmer... (
show quote)
Nobody but Louie "The Lonestar Loon" Gohmert thought his i***tic lawsuit to make Pence a kingmaker was going anywhere but being laughed out of court.
Blade_Runner wrote:
No judge allowed the complaints to get past the pleading stage in which presentation of evidence is not necessary for litigation to proceed. These were all summary dismissals and did not allow the discovery process to go forward.
When a judge dismisses a complaint without proceeding to discovery where evidence is first introduced, it doesn't magically make all the evidence disappear.
The evidence of v***r f***d is, in fact and law, massive. And the fact that fraud occurred primarily in the swing states is a red f**g that cannot be ignored.
SCOTUS never reviewed a single complaint. Out of cowardice, they based their decision on the premise alone. The chief justice should be tarred and feathered, he and his cohorts just destroyed the highest court in the land.
FYI: Who appointed these judges is irrelevant.
Denial is a b*tch, isn't it?
No judge allowed the complaints to get past the pl... (
show quote)
You are spot on... other than the fact that there is no pleading stage in civil court.
Blade_Runner wrote:
No judge allowed the complaints to get past the pleading stage in which presentation of evidence is not necessary for litigation to proceed. These were all summary dismissals and did not allow the discovery process to go forward.
When a judge dismisses a complaint without proceeding to discovery where evidence is first introduced, it doesn't magically make all the evidence disappear.
The evidence of v***r f***d is, in fact and law, massive. And the fact that fraud occurred primarily in the swing states is a red f**g that cannot be ignored.
SCOTUS never reviewed a single complaint. Out of cowardice, they based their decision on the premise alone. The chief justice should be tarred and feathered, he and his cohorts just destroyed the highest court in the land.
FYI: Who appointed these judges is irrelevant.
Denial is a b*tch, isn't it?
No judge allowed the complaints to get past the pl... (
show quote)
Great response Blade. Your sense of composure is admirable. I am finding it more and more difficult and may need to step away for a bit.
ldsuttonjr wrote:
milosia2: How ironic...Do you believe in rule of Law? That is the definition of a Republic! We do not live in a democracy! When 150+ lawmakers show up at the Capitol on J** 6th and claim e******n TREASON; you may get the point and education that will rub you raw! There is a well-defined process in the constitution that will take place, and it will ruin your day! Stop being so ignorant! I don't think you and your ilk will ever catch on because your playbook is corrupted!
Lol that’s funny right there, I don’t care who you are.
I think you and your ilk have a disease that keeps telling you there’s nothing wrong with you.
Similar to anorexias but with t***h and facts. When you see t***h your mind turns it automatically into a lie. Facts same way.
The rule of Law ?????
The rule is when the whistle blows, the game is over. It’s not time for discussion or lawsuits, it’s over. pick up your crap and get off the field, you lost, go home and cry about it. It isn’t time to kick nonsense in gear .
That the rule of law you’re referring to ?
ACP45 wrote:
This was the statement issued by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) late Friday, after a federal judge dismissed the lawsuit he and others filed against Vice President Mike Pence.
Can anyone tell me if any e******n f***d lawsuit brought by anyone, has actually been heard by a court, with evidence actually presented for any court to rule upon? The answer I believe is a definitive "NO".
Which brings up the the real issue of the legal process and the rule of law in this country. 70 million plus v**ers believe that there is ample evidence of v***r f***d, and NO Court wants to hear the evidence.
Friends, we have a situation that is reaching the boiling point. Many people are waiting, and hoping that the legal process will resolve this issue peacefully. We are still waiting!
This was the statement issued by Rep. Louie Gohmer... (
show quote)
Yes they have, many times.....................and judges still dismissed the complaints.
ACP45 wrote:
This was the statement issued by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) late Friday, after a federal judge dismissed the lawsuit he and others filed against Vice President Mike Pence.
Can anyone tell me if any e******n f***d lawsuit brought by anyone, has actually been heard by a court, with evidence actually presented for any court to rule upon? The answer I believe is a definitive "NO".
Which brings up the the real issue of the legal process and the rule of law in this country. 70 million plus v**ers believe that there is ample evidence of v***r f***d, and NO Court wants to hear the evidence.
Friends, we have a situation that is reaching the boiling point. Many people are waiting, and hoping that the legal process will resolve this issue peacefully. We are still waiting!
This was the statement issued by Rep. Louie Gohmer... (
show quote)
And to top this off the judge, in this case, was appointed by Donald. And you also seem to be missing the larger point that 81.2 million people v**ed for Biden, a full 7 million more v**ers than v**ed for Trump. Also, you do understand that believing something is true doesn't make it true...don't you? So to you, 70 million people believing there is fraud means there was fraud? In that case, if 81.2 million believe that there was no fraud means there was no fraud and 81.2 million is more than 74.2 million so by your logic you lose once again...
Blade_Runner wrote:
No judge allowed the complaints to get past the pleading stage in which presentation of evidence is not necessary for litigation to proceed. These were all summary dismissals and did not allow the discovery process to go forward.
When a judge dismisses a complaint without proceeding to discovery where evidence is first introduced, it doesn't magically make all the evidence disappear.
The evidence of v***r f***d is, in fact and law, massive. And the fact that fraud occurred primarily in the swing states is a red f**g that cannot be ignored.
SCOTUS never reviewed a single complaint. Out of cowardice, they based their decision on the premise alone. The chief justice should be tarred and feathered, he and his cohorts just destroyed the highest court in the land.
FYI: Who appointed these judges is irrelevant.
Denial is a b*tch, isn't it?
No judge allowed the complaints to get past the pl... (
show quote)
Snip>>>As they frantically searched for ways to salvage President Donald Trump’s failed ree******n bid, his campaign pursued a dizzying game of legal hopscotch across six states that centered on the biggest prize of all: Pennsylvania.
The strategy may have played well in front of television cameras and on talk radio to Trump’s supporters. But it has proved a disaster in court, where judges uniformly rejected their claims of v**e f***d and found the campaign’s legal work amateurish.
In a scathing ruling late Saturday, U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann — a Republican and Federalist Society member in central Pennsylvania — compared the campaign’s legal arguments to “Frankenstein’s Monster,” concluding that Trump’s team offered only “speculative accusations,” not proof of rampant corruption.
The campaign on Sunday filed notice it would appeal the decision to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a day before the state’s 67 counties are set to certify their results and send them to state officials. And they asked Sunday night for an expedited hearing Wednesday as they seek to amend the Pennsylvania lawsuit that Brann dismissed.Now compound this by 53 and this is the reason that Trump lost all but one very minor case about where one can stand when viewing the handling of the b****ts. Blade, this was the Keystone cops legal defense. Remember Melissa Carone? Rudy put her on the stand not once but on two separate days...as the star witness! Imagine, you have an absolute disaster that everyone is laughing at, and she's the best you have to put on the stand! That's the state of the case Rudy was arguing. And speaking of Rudy, he's the best you have for a lawyer and he's a total embarrassment. Does it really not sink in just how amateurish a legal defense Trump put together?
And I know not a single one of you can see this--all you can see are conspiracies in every court all across the country! From Nevada, to Arizona, to Wisconsin, to Michigan, to Pennsylvania, and ending in Georgia. Oh, and I left out the Pennsylvania appeals court and the United States Supreme Court! Your argument is that every one of them is corrupted by the Deep State, ruled by E-vile liberals, which somehow we were able to coordinate between all of these courts in order to squelch the rulings for Donald J Trump. Really???
ACP45 wrote:
Which brings up the the real issue of the legal process and the rule of law in this country. 70 million plus v**ers believe that there is ample evidence of v***r f***d, and NO Court wants to hear the evidence.
Are there really 70 million people this ignorant? I don't care if 200 million believe this, it doesn't make it true... beliefs means absolutely nothing, they are beliefs not facts
Milosia2 wrote:
Lol that’s funny right there, I don’t care who you are.
I think you and your ilk have a disease that keeps telling you there’s nothing wrong with you.
Similar to anorexias but with t***h and facts. When you see t***h your mind turns it automatically into a lie. Facts same way.
The rule of Law ?????
The rule is when the whistle blows, the game is over. It’s not time for discussion or lawsuits, it’s over. pick up your crap and get off the field, you lost, go home and cry about it. It isn’t time to kick nonsense in gear .
That the rule of law you’re referring to ?
Lol that’s funny right there, I don’t care who you... (
show quote)
A whistle is blown, a f**g is thrown.
Game continues.
Tiptop789 wrote:
Who says 70 million? That's the problem, you assume just because someone v**ed for trump they automatically think the e******n was s****n. That's what trump (and you) are trying to do, steal the results of a f**r e******n. Lacking standing means there wasn't any basis on which to proceed.
The only thing fair about this e******n is Slo T*****r Joe's milky white, pasty complexion. Everything else is smoke and mirrors, lies, deceit, deception and fraud. Just accept it Tic Toc, your whole dem party is a thieving, marxist group of criminals.
roy wrote:
No the only thing it will do is make a long day for the ones involved ,in the end Joe will get his v**es . Because some want to make a name for themselves ,and still scared of trump will change nothing. Many of this bunch that will contest the v**es want to run in 2024,,they want to hang on to the trump base ,they don't give a rats ass about the constitution, just looking to hang on to trumps base that they know they can tell them anything and they will believe.
In the end, Slo Joe will get a short rope. Adios Slo T*****r Joe.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.