One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Not physically possible' for Dominion machines to flip votes: Michael Steel. 11/22/
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Nov 22, 2020 18:25:27   #
Lonewolf
 
New York Post : 'Not physically possible' for Dominion machines to flip votes: Michael Steel.
https://nypost.com/2020/11/22/not-physically-possible-for-dominion-machines-to-flip-votes-rep/

Reply
Nov 22, 2020 18:37:33   #
tbutkovich
 
He’sa company spokesman. Would you expect him to respond differently?

Reply
Nov 22, 2020 18:50:24   #
Auntie Dee
 
What the NYPost is claiming in this article and what he alleged on Fox News, is NOT the way that the FRAUD was committed! It may be true that it cannot FLIP votes. Most of the fraud does not lie with the actual voting machines but in how the software which runs the machines can be & is manipulated!

One of the ways this happens is that the software can have weighted values assigned to each candidate, proved by the fact that it presents it's tabulated results in "fractions" not in whole numbers! The software can WEIGH its results by giving (for instance) 125% Biden vs .75% Trump! So that the final tabulated votes tell a different story that what the actual votes tell.

This has NOTHING to do with FLIPPING an individual vote from Trump to Biden, but it does give a FRAUDULENT outcome!! IT appears that Michael Steel has allowed himself to be a pawn in this deception!

This is just one example of the ways that the FRAUD has occurred, there are others!

Reply
 
 
Nov 22, 2020 19:06:03   #
Abel
 
Lonewolf wrote:
New York Post : 'Not physically possible' for Dominion machines to flip votes: Michael Steel.
https://nypost.com/2020/11/22/not-physically-possible-for-dominion-machines-to-flip-votes-rep/


BU!!$H!T!!!!

Reply
Nov 22, 2020 19:08:01   #
Rose42
 
Lonewolf wrote:
New York Post : 'Not physically possible' for Dominion machines to flip votes: Michael Steel.
https://nypost.com/2020/11/22/not-physically-possible-for-dominion-machines-to-flip-votes-rep/


If you knew anything about software, you'd know there's a way. I'm not suggesting that happened but it is certainly possible regardless of what he says.

Reply
Nov 22, 2020 19:20:51   #
Lonewolf
 
Rose42 wrote:
If you knew anything about software, you'd know there's a way. I'm not suggesting that happened but it is certainly possible regardless of what he says.


But hand recounts come to the same conclusion?

Reply
Nov 22, 2020 19:22:29   #
Rose42
 
Lonewolf wrote:
But hand recounts come to the same conclusion?


I’m only addressing the software. Anything can be altered.

Reply
 
 
Nov 22, 2020 20:07:53   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Lonewolf wrote:
New York Post : 'Not physically possible' for Dominion machines to flip votes: Michael Steel.
https://nypost.com/2020/11/22/not-physically-possible-for-dominion-machines-to-flip-votes-rep/

Dominion Weakness: Little is known about the security of Dominion’s own IT systems

US Election Companies: Wharton asserts US elections are “characterized by a consolidated, highly concentrated market dominated by a few vendors, where industry growth and competition is consolidated.” Three companies rule, Election Systems & Software (ES&S), Dominion, and Hart InterCivic, used by 92% of US voters, as Dominion services 40%. Smartmatic is another big US player.

Dominion History: Dominion, founded by Canadian John Poulos in 2000, is now owned by Staple Street Capital LLC, says Bloomberg. Writes Forbes, “In 2009, Diebold Election Systems was sold to its competitor, ES&S, and in 2010 selling to Dominion Voting Systems” gaining “all intellectual property, software, firmware, and hardware.” Dominion and Smartmatic contracted for 2010 and 2013 Philippines elections where claims of malfunction and fraud abounded. In 2016, seventy-one million voters in 1,635 jurisdictions used Dominion, also tied to the Clinton Foundation, and a $2.25 million project together. Robert Mueller’s firm Wilmer Hale was their agent in 2004. Dominion outsources components to China “...down to the chip component level.”

Dominion Weakness: Little is known about the security of Dominion’s own IT systems. Becker lists Dominion problems in 2020. Writes Forbes:


“How can a vendor sell a voting system with this many vulnerabilities?”

“Former WH Cybersecurity Coordinator, Michael Daniel, notes voting machine companies aren’t known for cybersecurity expertise. Jake Stauffer, AF cyber analyst tested Dominion voting systems for CA, observing: “I’ve found for voting systems, security isn’t taken very seriously.” Testing, Staufer found vulnerabilities in Dominion’s Democracy Suite (DDC) voting equipment enabling remote code execution, denial of service attacks, and off-line ballot tampering. “How can a vendor sell a voting system with this many vulnerabilities?” he asks.”

Texas Rejects 2020: Washingtonwatch reported, “Texas rejected Dominion 3 times for elections.

“The examiner identified multiple hardware & software issues precluding Office of Texas Sec of State from determining DDC system satisfies each voting-system requirement set forth in TX Election Code. Specifically, the examiner reports raise concerns whether DDC system is suitable for intended purpose; operates efficiently and accurately; and is safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation.”

Dominion Glitches: Of failures Brietbart states: “The election software “glitching” in GA & MI, which incorrectly gave Joe Biden thousands of votes, is used in 28 states, according to the software company’s website.” When Dominion blamed a day-before “update,” Politico wrote, “Supervisor, Marcia Ridley of Spalding County Board Elections says records show no such update occurred…That is something that they don’t ever do. I’ve never seen them update anything the day before the election.” Dominion then corrected this, admitting last update was Oct 31. Does this reveal fraud?




Tainted companies threatening to destroy Trump’s original blowout victory over feeble Joe

Dominion Source Code Origin: The origin of Dominion’s source code is especially problematic, given Smartmatic being “adopted” by Hugo Chavez in 2004, subsidized, trained to build vote machines and code, then used to rig an election. And then Smartmatic acquired Sequoia in 2005, using it to evolve their software until selling in 2007 to Dominion. Smartmatic even went to court to preserve their right to use the code they developed. In other words, everything that was developed by Smartmatic and Sequoia, including the software allowing ballot fraud in Hugo Chavez’ failed recall, was passed onto Dominion.

Election Company Tabulating U.S. Votes Manipulated Millions of Votes, FLIPPED ELECTIONS in Venezuela, Brazil, Philippines

CONCLUSION: Dominion Systems Hidden Power: Smartmatic machines were created for 2004 Venezuela elections, organized and funded by recipient Hugo Chavez. Then Dominion inherited it all. But questions still swirl regarding if Dominion is just a front for Smartmatic, It’s no surprise a massive fraud envelops all these tainted companies threatening to destroy Trump’s original blowout victory over feeble Joe. Was the 1 million ghost ballot dump by Smartmatic in Venezuela’s 2017 election an accident, or vote fraud? Here is the key question: If the engineers who ran Dominion wanted to commit massive ballot fraud against a US candidate, based on everything we know – Is there anything that could have stopped them?

Reply
Nov 22, 2020 20:43:24   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Lonewolf wrote:
New York Post : 'Not physically possible' for Dominion machines to flip votes: Michael Steel.
https://nypost.com/2020/11/22/not-physically-possible-for-dominion-machines-to-flip-votes-rep/



Reply
Nov 22, 2020 20:47:20   #
ImLogicallyRight
 
Lonewolf wrote:
New York Post : 'Not physically possible' for Dominion machines to flip votes: Michael Steel.
https://nypost.com/2020/11/22/not-physically-possible-for-dominion-machines-to-flip-votes-rep/


***New York Post : 'Not physically possible' for Dominion machines to flip votes: Michael Steel.
>>>It was designed to do exactly that.

Reply
Nov 23, 2020 05:45:46   #
Big Kahuna
 
Lonewolf wrote:
New York Post : 'Not physically possible' for Dominion machines to flip votes: Michael Steel.
https://nypost.com/2020/11/22/not-physically-possible-for-dominion-machines-to-flip-votes-rep/


Those machines abd its software have been shown many times to be easily tampered with and even come with instructions on how to implement the tampering.

Reply
 
 
Nov 23, 2020 05:48:59   #
Big Kahuna
 
Lonewolf wrote:
But hand recounts come to the same conclusion?


When you count illegal votes the 1st time and those same illegal votes a 2nd time you still come up with the same illegal tally. They could count them 10 times and it wouldn't matter.

Reply
Nov 23, 2020 05:49:49   #
tbutkovich
 
When it comes to cheating (especially by the Democrats), anything is possible! This spokesman thinks he is a God:

Michael Steel believes: “If I tell you it is so, it is the truth.”

Only God speaks the truth and you, Michael Steel are not God. You Michael Steel are a member of the conspiracy! A forked tongue eloquent speaker like your handler, Barack Obama, trying to convince those of us who saw hundreds of thousands of vote margins in the swing states counted for Trump vanish over night.

Don’t patronize us Michael Steele. Go collect your bonus paycheck from the DNC, George Soros and your crooked Company! What a dumbA$$ you are Michael Steele, to even think we would believe you are credible! You can go to hell!

Reply
Nov 23, 2020 05:51:28   #
Big Kahuna
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Dominion Weakness: Little is known about the security of Dominion’s own IT systems

US Election Companies: Wharton asserts US elections are “characterized by a consolidated, highly concentrated market dominated by a few vendors, where industry growth and competition is consolidated.” Three companies rule, Election Systems & Software (ES&S), Dominion, and Hart InterCivic, used by 92% of US voters, as Dominion services 40%. Smartmatic is another big US player.

Dominion History: Dominion, founded by Canadian John Poulos in 2000, is now owned by Staple Street Capital LLC, says Bloomberg. Writes Forbes, “In 2009, Diebold Election Systems was sold to its competitor, ES&S, and in 2010 selling to Dominion Voting Systems” gaining “all intellectual property, software, firmware, and hardware.” Dominion and Smartmatic contracted for 2010 and 2013 Philippines elections where claims of malfunction and fraud abounded. In 2016, seventy-one million voters in 1,635 jurisdictions used Dominion, also tied to the Clinton Foundation, and a $2.25 million project together. Robert Mueller’s firm Wilmer Hale was their agent in 2004. Dominion outsources components to China “...down to the chip component level.”

Dominion Weakness: Little is known about the security of Dominion’s own IT systems. Becker lists Dominion problems in 2020. Writes Forbes:


“How can a vendor sell a voting system with this many vulnerabilities?”

“Former WH Cybersecurity Coordinator, Michael Daniel, notes voting machine companies aren’t known for cybersecurity expertise. Jake Stauffer, AF cyber analyst tested Dominion voting systems for CA, observing: “I’ve found for voting systems, security isn’t taken very seriously.” Testing, Staufer found vulnerabilities in Dominion’s Democracy Suite (DDC) voting equipment enabling remote code execution, denial of service attacks, and off-line ballot tampering. “How can a vendor sell a voting system with this many vulnerabilities?” he asks.”

Texas Rejects 2020: Washingtonwatch reported, “Texas rejected Dominion 3 times for elections.

“The examiner identified multiple hardware & software issues precluding Office of Texas Sec of State from determining DDC system satisfies each voting-system requirement set forth in TX Election Code. Specifically, the examiner reports raise concerns whether DDC system is suitable for intended purpose; operates efficiently and accurately; and is safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation.”

Dominion Glitches: Of failures Brietbart states: “The election software “glitching” in GA & MI, which incorrectly gave Joe Biden thousands of votes, is used in 28 states, according to the software company’s website.” When Dominion blamed a day-before “update,” Politico wrote, “Supervisor, Marcia Ridley of Spalding County Board Elections says records show no such update occurred…That is something that they don’t ever do. I’ve never seen them update anything the day before the election.” Dominion then corrected this, admitting last update was Oct 31. Does this reveal fraud?




Tainted companies threatening to destroy Trump’s original blowout victory over feeble Joe

Dominion Source Code Origin: The origin of Dominion’s source code is especially problematic, given Smartmatic being “adopted” by Hugo Chavez in 2004, subsidized, trained to build vote machines and code, then used to rig an election. And then Smartmatic acquired Sequoia in 2005, using it to evolve their software until selling in 2007 to Dominion. Smartmatic even went to court to preserve their right to use the code they developed. In other words, everything that was developed by Smartmatic and Sequoia, including the software allowing ballot fraud in Hugo Chavez’ failed recall, was passed onto Dominion.

Election Company Tabulating U.S. Votes Manipulated Millions of Votes, FLIPPED ELECTIONS in Venezuela, Brazil, Philippines

CONCLUSION: Dominion Systems Hidden Power: Smartmatic machines were created for 2004 Venezuela elections, organized and funded by recipient Hugo Chavez. Then Dominion inherited it all. But questions still swirl regarding if Dominion is just a front for Smartmatic, It’s no surprise a massive fraud envelops all these tainted companies threatening to destroy Trump’s original blowout victory over feeble Joe. Was the 1 million ghost ballot dump by Smartmatic in Venezuela’s 2017 election an accident, or vote fraud? Here is the key question: If the engineers who ran Dominion wanted to commit massive ballot fraud against a US candidate, based on everything we know – Is there anything that could have stopped them?
Dominion Weakness: Little is known about the secur... (show quote)


Geez, what could go wrong with a system like this???

Reply
Nov 23, 2020 07:25:28   #
Tug484
 
Lonewolf wrote:
New York Post : 'Not physically possible' for Dominion machines to flip votes: Michael Steel.
https://nypost.com/2020/11/22/not-physically-possible-for-dominion-machines-to-flip-votes-rep/


He is not telling the truth.
A Jeb Bush lackey.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.