Parky60
Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
Trump Still Has Several Constitutional Paths to Victory, Dershowitz Says
Jack Phillips ~ November 22, 2020
Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard Law professor emeritus, said he thinks President Donald Trump has several legal paths to a 2020 election victory.
Dershowitz said there are a few “constitutional paths to victory” for the president’s legal team, although he noted that Trump will face legal hurdles in all of them.
“For example, in Pennsylvania, they have two very strong legal arguments. One, that the courts changed what the legislature did about counting ballots after the end of Election Day. That’s a winning issue in the Supreme Court. I don’t necessarily support it, but it’s a winning issue in the Supreme Court,” Dershowitz told Fox Business on Nov. 22.
The team, meanwhile, has “a winning issue in the Supreme Court on equal protection, that some counties allowed flawed ballots to be cured while others didn’t. Bush v. Gore suggests that an Equal Protection argument can prevail.”
Dershowitz, who helped defend Trump during the Senate impeachment trial earlier this year, said that because of Democratic candidate Joe Biden’s lead over the president, Trump’s team may not be able to contest enough ballots in Pennsylvania.
“The other legal theory they have, which is a potentially strong one, is that the computers, either fraudulently or by glitches, changed hundreds of thousands of votes. There, there are enough votes to make a difference, but I haven’t seen the evidence to support that,” he said. “So, in one case, they don’t have the numbers. In another case, they don’t seem yet to have the evidence, maybe they do. I haven’t seen it. But the legal theory is there to support them if they have the numbers and they have the evidence.”
However, time is running out for Trump’s legal team, he said.
“You need to have witnesses, experts subject to cross-examination, and findings by a court,” he said, adding that there is no “legal route to undoing that” after the election is certified. “Their strongest case, if they have the evidence, is that computers may have turned hundreds of thousands of votes.”
Last week, Dershowitz noted that if Trump can “keep the Biden [electoral] count below 270, then the matter goes to the House of Representatives, where, of course, there is a Republican majority among the delegations of states, and you vote by state if it goes to the House.”
“You need a perfect storm for it to work,” he said. “You need to get enough states, enough state attorneys general, or state departments, or whoever, secretaries of state or governors that are Republican that legitimately refuse to certify the results because they’re under challenge on the day the Electoral College meets by statute.”
Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), a former prosecutor, said week that Congress has the “ultimate say over whether to accept or reject” Electoral College votes.
“Congress has the absolute right to reject the submitted Electoral College votes of any state, which we believe has such a shoddy election system that you can’t trust the election results that those states are submitting to us, that they’re suspect,” Brooks said. “And I’m not going to put my name in support of any state that employs an election system that I don’t have confidence in.”
Brooks noted that “on January 6th at 1 p.m. Eastern time, the 50 states will report to Congress, the president [of the] Senate will preside over this meeting” and “will report to Congress what they contend are their Electoral College results in their state.” The president of the Senate, under the U.S. Constitution, is Vice President Mike Pence.
You realize that the main reason I'm posting this besides the fact that it's true, albeit being a slim chance, is so you leftists will blow a gasket, don't you. And besides I'm glad Trump's exploring every avenue because there were WAY too many irregularities that have happened this election despite what you lefties say. 70 million people agree, and logic -- something you lefties don't have -- dictates it. There is NO WAY a man that basically didn't even campaign, made gaffe after gaffe, suffers from pre-senility, etc. could have gotten the most votes ever in a presidential election. But then again he had the MSM and social media in his back pocket. But I digress. You leftists know and 70 million people know that though it appears right now that it can't be proven something's definitely rotten in Denmark. And the funny thing is that I truly believe that you leftist useful idiots -- that's what I call...you useful idiots -- have truly released "the Krakken" on this nation and world. Galatians 6:7 says that whatever a person sows, this he will also reap. And you people are too ignorant to realize that what you've sowed is going to reap the whirlwind. Parky60
Parky60 wrote:
Trump Still Has Several Constitutional Paths to Victory, Dershowitz Says
Jack Phillips ~ November 22, 2020
Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard Law professor emeritus, said he thinks President Donald Trump has several legal paths to a 2020 election victory.
Dershowitz said there are a few “constitutional paths to victory” for the president’s legal team, although he noted that Trump will face legal hurdles in all of them.
“For example, in Pennsylvania, they have two very strong legal arguments. One, that the courts changed what the legislature did about counting ballots after the end of Election Day. That’s a winning issue in the Supreme Court. I don’t necessarily support it, but it’s a winning issue in the Supreme Court,” Dershowitz told Fox Business on Nov. 22.
The team, meanwhile, has “a winning issue in the Supreme Court on equal protection, that some counties allowed flawed ballots to be cured while others didn’t. Bush v. Gore suggests that an Equal Protection argument can prevail.”
Dershowitz, who helped defend Trump during the Senate impeachment trial earlier this year, said that because of Democratic candidate Joe Biden’s lead over the president, Trump’s team may not be able to contest enough ballots in Pennsylvania.
“The other legal theory they have, which is a potentially strong one, is that the computers, either fraudulently or by glitches, changed hundreds of thousands of votes. There, there are enough votes to make a difference, but I haven’t seen the evidence to support that,” he said. “So, in one case, they don’t have the numbers. In another case, they don’t seem yet to have the evidence, maybe they do. I haven’t seen it. But the legal theory is there to support them if they have the numbers and they have the evidence.”
However, time is running out for Trump’s legal team, he said.
“You need to have witnesses, experts subject to cross-examination, and findings by a court,” he said, adding that there is no “legal route to undoing that” after the election is certified. “Their strongest case, if they have the evidence, is that computers may have turned hundreds of thousands of votes.”
Last week, Dershowitz noted that if Trump can “keep the Biden [electoral] count below 270, then the matter goes to the House of Representatives, where, of course, there is a Republican majority among the delegations of states, and you vote by state if it goes to the House.”
“You need a perfect storm for it to work,” he said. “You need to get enough states, enough state attorneys general, or state departments, or whoever, secretaries of state or governors that are Republican that legitimately refuse to certify the results because they’re under challenge on the day the Electoral College meets by statute.”
Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), a former prosecutor, said week that Congress has the “ultimate say over whether to accept or reject” Electoral College votes.
“Congress has the absolute right to reject the submitted Electoral College votes of any state, which we believe has such a shoddy election system that you can’t trust the election results that those states are submitting to us, that they’re suspect,” Brooks said. “And I’m not going to put my name in support of any state that employs an election system that I don’t have confidence in.”
Brooks noted that “on January 6th at 1 p.m. Eastern time, the 50 states will report to Congress, the president [of the] Senate will preside over this meeting” and “will report to Congress what they contend are their Electoral College results in their state.” The president of the Senate, under the U.S. Constitution, is Vice President Mike Pence.
You realize that the main reason I'm posting this besides the fact that it's true, albeit being a slim chance, is so you leftists will blow a gasket, don't you. And besides I'm glad Trump's exploring every avenue because there were WAY too many irregularities that have happened this election despite what you lefties say. 70 million people agree, and logic -- something you lefties don't have -- dictates it. There is NO WAY a man that basically didn't even campaign, made gaffe after gaffe, suffers from pre-senility, etc. could have gotten the most votes ever in a presidential election. But then again he had the MSM and social media in his back pocket. But I digress. You leftists know and 70 million people know that though it appears right now that it can't be proven something's definitely rotten in Denmark. And the funny thing is that I truly believe that you leftist useful idiots -- that's what I call...you useful idiots -- have truly released "the Krakken" on this nation and world. Galatians 6:7 says that whatever a person sows, this he will also reap. And you people are too ignorant to realize that what you've sowed is going to reap the whirlwind. Parky60
b Trump Still Has Several Constitutional Paths to... (
show quote)
Why did Biden win,because trump preached to just part of the country,not the majority,he talked down to the majority of the country,in trumps mind he thought his rallys was the majority ,they weren't. That's why trump lost. And just like you you want to talk down to the majority of the country.,because you think you like trump,,a dam looser just like trump.
roy wrote:
Why did Biden win,because trump preached to just part of the country,not the majority,he talked down to the majority of the country,in trumps mind he thought his rallys was the majority ,they weren't. That's why trump lost. And just like you you want to talk down to the majority of the country.,because you think you like trump,,a dam looser just like trump.
The country is the loser with Biden.
Stay well!
roy wrote:
Why did Biden win,because trump preached to just part of the country,not the majority,he talked down to the majority of the country,in trumps mind he thought his rallys was the majority ,they weren't. That's why trump lost. And just like you you want to talk down to the majority of the country.,because you think you like trump,,a dam looser just like trump.
As Dershowitz said, Trump needs EVIDENCE.
Damn, where did I hear that before?
Parky60 wrote:
Trump Still Has Several Constitutional Paths to Victory, Dershowitz Says
Jack Phillips ~ November 22, 2020
Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard Law professor emeritus, said he thinks President Donald Trump has several legal paths to a 2020 election victory.
Dershowitz said there are a few “constitutional paths to victory” for the president’s legal team, although he noted that Trump will face legal hurdles in all of them.
“For example, in Pennsylvania, they have two very strong legal arguments. One, that the courts changed what the legislature did about counting ballots after the end of Election Day. That’s a winning issue in the Supreme Court. I don’t necessarily support it, but it’s a winning issue in the Supreme Court,” Dershowitz told Fox Business on Nov. 22.
The team, meanwhile, has “a winning issue in the Supreme Court on equal protection, that some counties allowed flawed ballots to be cured while others didn’t. Bush v. Gore suggests that an Equal Protection argument can prevail.”
Dershowitz, who helped defend Trump during the Senate impeachment trial earlier this year, said that because of Democratic candidate Joe Biden’s lead over the president, Trump’s team may not be able to contest enough ballots in Pennsylvania.
“The other legal theory they have, which is a potentially strong one, is that the computers, either fraudulently or by glitches, changed hundreds of thousands of votes. There, there are enough votes to make a difference, but I haven’t seen the evidence to support that,” he said. “So, in one case, they don’t have the numbers. In another case, they don’t seem yet to have the evidence, maybe they do. I haven’t seen it. But the legal theory is there to support them if they have the numbers and they have the evidence.”
However, time is running out for Trump’s legal team, he said.
“You need to have witnesses, experts subject to cross-examination, and findings by a court,” he said, adding that there is no “legal route to undoing that” after the election is certified. “Their strongest case, if they have the evidence, is that computers may have turned hundreds of thousands of votes.”
Last week, Dershowitz noted that if Trump can “keep the Biden [electoral] count below 270, then the matter goes to the House of Representatives, where, of course, there is a Republican majority among the delegations of states, and you vote by state if it goes to the House.”
“You need a perfect storm for it to work,” he said. “You need to get enough states, enough state attorneys general, or state departments, or whoever, secretaries of state or governors that are Republican that legitimately refuse to certify the results because they’re under challenge on the day the Electoral College meets by statute.”
Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), a former prosecutor, said week that Congress has the “ultimate say over whether to accept or reject” Electoral College votes.
“Congress has the absolute right to reject the submitted Electoral College votes of any state, which we believe has such a shoddy election system that you can’t trust the election results that those states are submitting to us, that they’re suspect,” Brooks said. “And I’m not going to put my name in support of any state that employs an election system that I don’t have confidence in.”
Brooks noted that “on January 6th at 1 p.m. Eastern time, the 50 states will report to Congress, the president [of the] Senate will preside over this meeting” and “will report to Congress what they contend are their Electoral College results in their state.” The president of the Senate, under the U.S. Constitution, is Vice President Mike Pence.
You realize that the main reason I'm posting this besides the fact that it's true, albeit being a slim chance, is so you leftists will blow a gasket, don't you. And besides I'm glad Trump's exploring every avenue because there were WAY too many irregularities that have happened this election despite what you lefties say. 70 million people agree, and logic -- something you lefties don't have -- dictates it. There is NO WAY a man that basically didn't even campaign, made gaffe after gaffe, suffers from pre-senility, etc. could have gotten the most votes ever in a presidential election. But then again he had the MSM and social media in his back pocket. But I digress. You leftists know and 70 million people know that though it appears right now that it can't be proven something's definitely rotten in Denmark. And the funny thing is that I truly believe that you leftist useful idiots -- that's what I call...you useful idiots -- have truly released "the Krakken" on this nation and world. Galatians 6:7 says that whatever a person sows, this he will also reap. And you people are too ignorant to realize that what you've sowed is going to reap the whirlwind. Parky60
b Trump Still Has Several Constitutional Paths to... (
show quote)
I thought Dershowitz was in jail.
Parky60
Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
Leave the gun. Take the cannoli. wrote:
As Dershowitz said, Trump needs EVIDENCE.
Damn, where did I hear that before?
I just saw a video by a man I very much respect who is an attorney and he said that evidence keeps being shown but your side says there is no evidence. Remember that fake news? It's in full force now.
Another example is a speech Justin Trudeau made saying on video that we need the Great Reset then him and the MSM denying he ever said it. Go figure. The left is a bunch of liars and useful idiots like you eat it up.
Parky60 wrote:
I just saw a video by a man I very much respect who is an attorney and he said that evidence keeps being shown but your side says there is no evidence. Remember that fake news? It's in full force now.
Another example is a speech Justin Trudeau made saying on video that we need the Great Reset then him and the MSM denying he ever said it. Go figure. The left is a bunch of liars and useful idiots like you eat it up.
This is not a media show, no decision on the election is made in the media.
Trump is losing in court - including many republican judges. Not to mention republican election officials in Michigan, Georgia and Pennsylvania.
roy wrote:
Why did Biden win,because trump preached to just part of the country,not the majority,he talked down to the majority of the country,in trumps mind he thought his rallys was the majority ,they weren't. That's why trump lost. And just like you you want to talk down to the majority of the country.,because you think you like trump,,a dam looser just like trump.
I disagree. He didn't win. At least not yet. There is massive evidence of voter fraud and if there is enough time, President Trump will be proven the winner.
Leave the gun. Take the cannoli. wrote:
This is not a media show, no decision on the election is made in the media.
Trump is losing in court - including many republican judges. Not to mention republican election officials in Michigan, Georgia and Pennsylvania.
***This is not a media show, no decision on the election is made in the media.
>>>But then you go on and on about what the media declared in picking Biden the winner without certification and an Electoral college vote
Parky60 wrote:
Trump Still Has Several Constitutional Paths to Victory, Dershowitz Says
Jack Phillips ~ November 22, 2020
Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard Law professor emeritus, said he thinks President Donald Trump has several legal paths to a 2020 election victory.
Dershowitz said there are a few “constitutional paths to victory” for the president’s legal team, although he noted that Trump will face legal hurdles in all of them.
“For example, in Pennsylvania, they have two very strong legal arguments. One, that the courts changed what the legislature did about counting ballots after the end of Election Day. That’s a winning issue in the Supreme Court. I don’t necessarily support it, but it’s a winning issue in the Supreme Court,” Dershowitz told Fox Business on Nov. 22.
The team, meanwhile, has “a winning issue in the Supreme Court on equal protection, that some counties allowed flawed ballots to be cured while others didn’t. Bush v. Gore suggests that an Equal Protection argument can prevail.”
Dershowitz, who helped defend Trump during the Senate impeachment trial earlier this year, said that because of Democratic candidate Joe Biden’s lead over the president, Trump’s team may not be able to contest enough ballots in Pennsylvania.
“The other legal theory they have, which is a potentially strong one, is that the computers, either fraudulently or by glitches, changed hundreds of thousands of votes. There, there are enough votes to make a difference, but I haven’t seen the evidence to support that,” he said. “So, in one case, they don’t have the numbers. In another case, they don’t seem yet to have the evidence, maybe they do. I haven’t seen it. But the legal theory is there to support them if they have the numbers and they have the evidence.”
However, time is running out for Trump’s legal team, he said.
“You need to have witnesses, experts subject to cross-examination, and findings by a court,” he said, adding that there is no “legal route to undoing that” after the election is certified. “Their strongest case, if they have the evidence, is that computers may have turned hundreds of thousands of votes.”
Last week, Dershowitz noted that if Trump can “keep the Biden [electoral] count below 270, then the matter goes to the House of Representatives, where, of course, there is a Republican majority among the delegations of states, and you vote by state if it goes to the House.”
“You need a perfect storm for it to work,” he said. “You need to get enough states, enough state attorneys general, or state departments, or whoever, secretaries of state or governors that are Republican that legitimately refuse to certify the results because they’re under challenge on the day the Electoral College meets by statute.”
Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), a former prosecutor, said week that Congress has the “ultimate say over whether to accept or reject” Electoral College votes.
“Congress has the absolute right to reject the submitted Electoral College votes of any state, which we believe has such a shoddy election system that you can’t trust the election results that those states are submitting to us, that they’re suspect,” Brooks said. “And I’m not going to put my name in support of any state that employs an election system that I don’t have confidence in.”
Brooks noted that “on January 6th at 1 p.m. Eastern time, the 50 states will report to Congress, the president [of the] Senate will preside over this meeting” and “will report to Congress what they contend are their Electoral College results in their state.” The president of the Senate, under the U.S. Constitution, is Vice President Mike Pence.
You realize that the main reason I'm posting this besides the fact that it's true, albeit being a slim chance, is so you leftists will blow a gasket, don't you. And besides I'm glad Trump's exploring every avenue because there were WAY too many irregularities that have happened this election despite what you lefties say. 70 million people agree, and logic -- something you lefties don't have -- dictates it. There is NO WAY a man that basically didn't even campaign, made gaffe after gaffe, suffers from pre-senility, etc. could have gotten the most votes ever in a presidential election. But then again he had the MSM and social media in his back pocket. But I digress. You leftists know and 70 million people know that though it appears right now that it can't be proven something's definitely rotten in Denmark. And the funny thing is that I truly believe that you leftist useful idiots -- that's what I call...you useful idiots -- have truly released "the Krakken" on this nation and world. Galatians 6:7 says that whatever a person sows, this he will also reap. And you people are too ignorant to realize that what you've sowed is going to reap the whirlwind. Parky60
b Trump Still Has Several Constitutional Paths to... (
show quote)
>>>
Dershowitz is WRONG !
Trump has only 2 options left and 1 way out 1 way to stop Biden and the Deep State and save the Republic.
Take the challenge Parky ... Prove me wrong.
Go to my 2 Topics on the Challenges
ImLogicallyRight wrote:
***This is not a media show, no decision on the election is made in the media.
>>>But then you go on and on about what the media declared in picking Biden the winner without certification and an Electoral college vote
Hello - time to get a grip. The media is not making the news, just reporting it
Leave the gun. Take the cannoli. wrote:
Hello - time to get a grip. The media is not making the news, just reporting it
>>>
That is also a Patently False Statement !
Please learn the conspiracy in the chain of ownership for the 6 networks here:
ImLogicallyRight wrote:
I disagree. He didn't win. At least not yet. There is massive evidence of voter fraud and if there is enough time, President Trump will be proven the winner.
Trump is going to win.
God is going to fix this mess and people are going to be shocked.
Parky60
Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
Leave the gun. Take the cannoli. wrote:
Hello - time to get a grip. The media is not making the news, just reporting it
You are quite delusional.
Tug484 wrote:
Trump is going to win.
God is going to fix this mess and people are going to be shocked.
>>>
I pray you’re right but I just dont see it.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.