Trump Still Has Several Constitutional Paths to Victory, Dershowitz Says
Jack Phillips ~ November 22, 2020
Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard Law professor emeritus, said he thinks President Donald Trump has several legal paths to a 2020 e******n victory.

Dershowitz said there are a few “constitutional paths to victory” for the president’s legal team, although he noted that Trump will face legal hurdles in all of them.

“For example, in Pennsylvania, they have two very strong legal arguments. One, that the courts changed what the legislature did about counting b****ts after the end of E******n Day. That’s a winning issue in the Supreme Court. I don’t necessarily support it, but it’s a winning issue in the Supreme Court,” Dershowitz told Fox Business on Nov. 22.

The team, meanwhile, has “a winning issue in the Supreme Court on equal protection, that some counties allowed flawed b****ts to be cured while others didn’t. Bush v. Gore suggests that an Equal Protection argument can prevail.”

Dershowitz, who helped defend Trump during the Senate impeachment trial earlier this year, said that because of Democratic candidate Joe Biden’s lead over the president, Trump’s team may not be able to contest enough b****ts in Pennsylvania.

“The other legal theory they have, which is a potentially strong one, is that the computers, either fraudulently or by glitches, changed hundreds of thousands of v**es. There, there are enough v**es to make a difference, but I haven’t seen the evidence to support that,” he said. “So, in one case, they don’t have the numbers. In another case, they don’t seem yet to have the evidence, maybe they do. I haven’t seen it. But the legal theory is there to support them if they have the numbers and they have the evidence.”

However, time is running out for Trump’s legal team, he said.

“You need to have witnesses, experts subject to cross-examination, and findings by a court,” he said, adding that there is no “legal route to undoing that” after the e******n is certified. “Their strongest case, if they have the evidence, is that computers may have turned hundreds of thousands of v**es.”

Last week, Dershowitz noted that if Trump can “keep the Biden [e*******l] count below 270, then the matter goes to the House of Representatives, where, of course, there is a Republican majority among the delegations of states, and you v**e by state if it goes to the House.”

“You need a perfect storm for it to work,” he said. “You need to get enough states, enough state attorneys general, or state departments, or whoever, secretaries of state or governors that are Republican that legitimately refuse to certify the results because they’re under challenge on the day the E*******l College meets by statute.”

Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), a former prosecutor, said week that Congress has the “ultimate say over whether to accept or reject” E*******l College v**es.

“Congress has the absolute right to reject the submitted E*******l College v**es of any state, which we believe has such a shoddy e******n system that you can’t trust the e******n results that those states are submitting to us, that they’re suspect,” Brooks said. “And I’m not going to put my name in support of any state that employs an e******n system that I don’t have confidence in.”

Brooks noted that “on J****** 6th at 1 p.m. Eastern time, the 50 states will report to Congress, the president [of the] Senate will preside over this meeting” and “will report to Congress what they contend are their E*******l College results in their state.” The president of the Senate, under the U.S. Constitution, is Vice President Mike Pence.

You realize that the main reason I'm posting this besides the fact that it's true, albeit being a slim chance, is so you l*****ts will blow a gasket, don't you. And besides I'm glad Trump's exploring every avenue because there were WAY too many irregularities that have happened this e******n despite what you lefties say. 70 million people agree, and logic -- something you lefties don't have -- dictates it. There is NO WAY a man that basically didn't even campaign, made gaffe after gaffe, suffers from pre-senility, etc. could have gotten the most v**es ever in a p**********l e******n. But then again he had the MSM and social media in his back pocket. But I digress. You l*****ts know and 70 million people know that though it appears right now that it can't be proven something's definitely rotten in Denmark. And the funny thing is that I truly believe that you l*****t useful i***ts -- that's what I call...you useful i***ts -- have truly released "the Krakken" on this nation and world. Galatians 6:7 says that wh**ever a person sows, this he will also reap. And you people are too ignorant to realize that what you've sowed is going to reap the whirlwind. Parky60

Here's evidence of irregularities in the 2020 p**********l e******n. These are OFFICIAL Nevada websites. The man who researched this is a well-respected attorney who has been practicing law for over 40 years.

Of interest are the time stamps from 13:55 to 19:45.

Don't you think it behooves us to investigate this along with other states that appear to have e******n irregularities to ensure that this was a fair and honest e******n? I strongly suspect that this is just the tip of the iceberg.

But you l*****ts just want us to lie down and accept the results. RIIIIIGHT!

Trump Still Has Several Constitutional Paths to Victory, Dershowitz Says
Jack Phillips ~ November 22, 2020
Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard Law professor emeritus, said he thinks President Donald Trump has several legal paths to a 2020 e******n victory.

Dershowitz said there are a few “constitutional paths to victory” for the president’s legal team, although he noted that Trump will face legal hurdles in all of them.

“For example, in Pennsylvania, they have two very strong legal arguments. One, that the courts changed what the legislature did about counting b****ts after the end of E******n Day. That’s a winning issue in the Supreme Court. I don’t necessarily support it, but it’s a winning issue in the Supreme Court,” Dershowitz told Fox Business on Nov. 22.

The team, meanwhile, has “a winning issue in the Supreme Court on equal protection, that some counties allowed flawed b****ts to be cured while others didn’t. Bush v. Gore suggests that an Equal Protection argument can prevail.”

Dershowitz, who helped defend Trump during the Senate impeachment trial earlier this year, said that because of Democratic candidate Joe Biden’s lead over the president, Trump’s team may not be able to contest enough b****ts in Pennsylvania.

“The other legal theory they have, which is a potentially strong one, is that the computers, either fraudulently or by glitches, changed hundreds of thousands of v**es. There, there are enough v**es to make a difference, but I haven’t seen the evidence to support that,” he said. “So, in one case, they don’t have the numbers. In another case, they don’t seem yet to have the evidence, maybe they do. I haven’t seen it. But the legal theory is there to support them if they have the numbers and they have the evidence.”

However, time is running out for Trump’s legal team, he said.

“You need to have witnesses, experts subject to cross-examination, and findings by a court,” he said, adding that there is no “legal route to undoing that” after the e******n is certified. “Their strongest case, if they have the evidence, is that computers may have turned hundreds of thousands of v**es.”

Last week, Dershowitz noted that if Trump can “keep the Biden [e*******l] count below 270, then the matter goes to the House of Representatives, where, of course, there is a Republican majority among the delegations of states, and you v**e by state if it goes to the House.”

“You need a perfect storm for it to work,” he said. “You need to get enough states, enough state attorneys general, or state departments, or whoever, secretaries of state or governors that are Republican that legitimately refuse to certify the results because they’re under challenge on the day the E*******l College meets by statute.”

Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), a former prosecutor, said week that Congress has the “ultimate say over whether to accept or reject” E*******l College v**es.

“Congress has the absolute right to reject the submitted E*******l College v**es of any state, which we believe has such a shoddy e******n system that you can’t trust the e******n results that those states are submitting to us, that they’re suspect,” Brooks said. “And I’m not going to put my name in support of any state that employs an e******n system that I don’t have confidence in.”

Brooks noted that “on J****** 6th at 1 p.m. Eastern time, the 50 states will report to Congress, the president [of the] Senate will preside over this meeting” and “will report to Congress what they contend are their E*******l College results in their state.” The president of the Senate, under the U.S. Constitution, is Vice President Mike Pence.

You realize that the main reason I'm posting this besides the fact that it's true, albeit being a slim chance, is so you l*****ts will blow a gasket, don't you. And besides I'm glad Trump's exploring every avenue because there were WAY too many irregularities that have happened this e******n despite what you lefties say. 70 million people agree, and logic -- something you lefties don't have -- dictates it. There is NO WAY a man that basically didn't even campaign, made gaffe after gaffe, suffers from pre-senility, etc. could have gotten the most v**es ever in a p**********l e******n. But then again he had the MSM and social media in his back pocket. But I digress. You l*****ts know and 70 million people know that though it appears right now that it can't be proven something's definitely rotten in Denmark. And the funny thing is that I truly believe that you l*****t useful i***ts -- that's what I call...you useful i***ts -- have truly released "the Krakken" on this nation and world. Galatians 6:7 says that wh**ever a person sows, this he will also reap. And you people are too ignorant to realize that what you've sowed is going to reap the whirlwind. Parky60