If Biden is Sworn in
Nov 21, 2020 08:04:50 #
Michael10 wrote:
SSDD,
Sorry I mistook your post as pro Trump, I'm and imperfect man in imperfect times but I as you, see the wrongs brought on this country by Trump
Sorry I mistook your post as pro Trump, I'm and imperfect man in imperfect times but I as you, see the wrongs brought on this country by Trump
Understood.
Nov 21, 2020 08:08:50 #
JFlorio wrote:
I see comedy is not your thing. Since we are being childish you could always come to Florida and try to make me. Or you can remain the key board coward I know you are.
Lolol, there are many a “keyboard commando” in here.. Talk big to compensate for their morally inept little person syndrome lacking any moral compass aka integrity...
They must inflict their bitterness, suspicion, disappointment or rage rants on others simply to feel some self worth..
Look upon them with pity and treat them accordingly~~Unfortunately those types are never inwardly happy and only look to drag you down to their level...Why accomodate them???
Nov 21, 2020 08:10:28 #
Simple Sam wrote:
Hold up, don't just dismiss this accusation out of hand. Do we not owe over 70 million people an investigation? At this point, if democrats disenfranchise these people and biden is sworn in or President Trump remains in office without a thorough review of ballots (especially mail in), machines, and book tabulation how can either side claim a clean victory?
The investigation is over, states have verified their counts and Biden came out on top. The accusations of voter fraud is just that, accusations. for something to be true you must have facts and proof and Trump has provided none of the above. He's slinging as much crap against the wall just to see what'll stick and have fooled way to many by his false accusations. At this point all that will do is put this country in more peril. Some people can't see the forests for the trees.
Nov 21, 2020 08:43:05 #
Simple Sam wrote:
We are in for an interesting four ears. br br For... (show quote)
I don't understand what your question is. Why wouldn't his administration be reflective of our nation? Does an individual's color matter or is their job performance where they should be judged?
Nov 21, 2020 08:46:53 #
Barracuda2020 wrote:
There was unsurmountable evidence, not to mention in Trump's own stupidity his own admittance. We just have the most majority rule senate ever in our history, not loyal to moral governing and our constitution, but rather loyal to a traitor con artist, why, because he's not a politician, that's rich, it truly is.
Where was all that unsurmountable evidence
they always claimed to have but never introduced?? Failing to have all that evidence they then blame Senate for not calling any witnesses... Now you want to talk rich, that's takes it right there.. Calling on the Senate to do their job... lolol, a good one..It is not and was not the senate responsibility to prove their case for them. It was however their obligation and responsibility to rule based on what was submitted... For two years all we ever heard from all of coup de tat’ players was they had more evidence than they could ever possibly need and yet when it came down to it they didn’t have a thing other than innuendo. Which is all they’ve ever had against Trump....
BTW do you mean the Ukraine pressure point tactics used in his infamous telephone call with Ukraine president? If so then do we move forward with bidens’ impeachment and his blackmailing tactics with all that money Ukraine would not not get What was it , some $1 billion in American taxpayer money.??? I mean we did all hear the phone call didn’t we??
“If the prosecutor’s not fired, you’re not getting the money,” he said, summing up his conversation with Poroshenko... And what happened?? He was fired, imagine that..
You call President Trumps admission stupid and don’t admit that he did so because he had nothing to hide...While giving biden once again giving a free ride...Ha.~~ thst too rich~~~
Nov 21, 2020 08:52:16 #
Seth wrote:
No, there was intentionally misconstrued dialogue between the two leaders that Pelosi, Schitt and Co. used to attack the president when they should, in fact, have been working with Trump in his efforts to address the still growing Covid-19 pandemic.
When that failed (only a few really desperately partisan and despicable people take the impeachment seriously), they turned their efforts to finding ways to exploit the pandemic for political purposes.
When that failed (only a few really desperately partisan and despicable people take the impeachment seriously), they turned their efforts to finding ways to exploit the pandemic for political purposes.
Seth, I listen to all of it, all the hearings and this was way before the pandemic, referring to the impeachment.
The Pandemic all parties should be working together, definitely agree on that.
Nov 21, 2020 09:04:33 #
SSDD wrote:
Yes, and one of the names is SWMBO.
SSDD, your comment is unjustified in irresponsibly attacking of a “poster” who is not a troll at all..She is a well known poster who enjoys a very good reputation..
A loving, caring “ lady” who is selfless to a fault and dealing with her husbands major medical issues right now..
May I ask you to consider such and reframe from attacking, please..
She made an observation in general not singling out or attacking any one person..
While you may disagree I suspect you could have worded it differently??Yes?
Please and Thank You...
Nov 21, 2020 09:12:50 #
SSDD wrote:
None to bright are you? You follow the stupidity of the fringe right media and believe every false narrative they push but can't accept ACTUAL facts, good luck with that.
Lolol, I do believe this is the universal statement of all time considering it suits “both sides” of the the “fanatical parties,” and the pushers~meaning the lying media of syndication...
Nov 21, 2020 09:31:59 #
Seth wrote:
If you don't think there's any reason to be suspic... (show quote)
Especially in light of the Dominion people whom first agreed to a hearing before PA instead backed out and lawyered up.. If nothing is suspect then why the backing out??
A roundtable between lawmakers and Dominion officials was planned, but Dominion Voting Systems ultimately backed out, leading to more questions than answers, CBS 21 reported.
However, as Grove said he was initially impressed with Dominion’s willingness to meet with them, this quickly changed as “Dominion Voting Systems lawyered up and backed out of their commitment to the people of Pennsylvania.”
Grove continued, “Instead of running toward the light of honesty and integrity, Dominion Voting Systems retreated to the darkness.”
The state rep. then continue down a list of rhetorical questions why this would occur if everything was above board.
After weeks of accusations, Dominion Voting Systems have failed to release any analysis of the success of their products in order to rebut the accusations. Moreover, why is it important to retain an attorney to represent a system that worked without error, or corrupt manipulation?
<snip, more the read>
https://www.lawofficer.com/dominion-voting-systems-has-lawyered-up-and-refuse-to-meet-with-pennsylvania-lawmakers/
Nov 21, 2020 09:40:53 #
Nov 21, 2020 09:43:33 #
solarkin wrote:
it was massive election fraud
trump won by a landslide
if Biden does what he says he's gonna do if he gets in ,this country is headed for civil war ,soon as the welfare money dries up
trump won by a landslide
if Biden does what he says he's gonna do if he gets in ,this country is headed for civil war ,soon as the welfare money dries up
Trump won by no landslide, that's the biggest joke/ lie that's been around since it happened.
Nov 21, 2020 09:49:54 #
Simple Sam wrote:
Hold up, don't just dismiss this accusation out of hand. Do we not owe over 70 million people an investigation? At this point, if democrats disenfranchise these people and biden is sworn in or President Trump remains in office without a thorough review of ballots (especially mail in), machines, and book tabulation how can either side claim a clean victory?
It's been done, we can do it over and over and over again but the results will be the same, why...because it's proven if there was ANY fraud, not enough to make a difference.
Nov 21, 2020 09:51:43 #
Nov 21, 2020 09:57:44 #
lindajoy wrote:
Where was all that unsurmountable evidence br the... (show quote)
Never introduced because it was blocked by Trump along with his administration, but there was still plenty there. I see Trump was never sworn in as they did with Clinton, nooo, that would have meant a slam dunk.
Nov 21, 2020 10:18:16 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.