One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
A Constitutional Crisis: Birth of Kamala Harris and Qualification for a VP
Page <<first <prev 6 of 9 next> last>>
Sep 5, 2020 21:46:51   #
Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial
 
Radiance3 wrote:
=================
Seriously? This dummy is teaching me his grammar. Facts are all the sentences you've written are wrong. Don't tease me dummy. Telling me that sentences should have a verb.You are proving yourself dumb and lack of education. Shame on you.

You are not WORTH MY TIME, thug. You don't know what you are talking about. Don't even try. Ridiculous!
Here is my last sentence for you. What a dummy thug!


Zip your pie hole. You appear to knows all about hoes? Must be a reason for that. You don't seem to know a lot about grammar, probably a reason for that. And last, you seem to know very little about current events. Good thing they did away with a pole test, you would fail big time. Lol. You're being conned by trump. Haha

Reply
Sep 5, 2020 21:48:55   #
Radiance3
 
Tiptop789 wrote:
Zip your pie hole. You appear to knows all about hoes? Must be a reason for that. You don't seem to know a lot about grammar, probably a reason for that. And last, you seem to know very little about current events. Good thing they did away with a pole test, you would fail big time. Lol. You're being conned by trump. Haha

==============
You have a dummy brain. You are not worth my time. NWR further, thug! Shame on you!

Reply
Sep 5, 2020 22:00:09   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Radiance3 wrote:
=============
She could be a US citizen based on birth, though so many legal challenges against that based on many circumstances as written.

But our question here is.. Is she considered a "natural born? That is why this topic was written.


She was hatched, like a snake.

Reply
 
 
Sep 5, 2020 22:13:57   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Lonewolf wrote:
It is she was born in the us and unlike trump she loves America,
Trumps comited do many felony's when he leaves office all he has left is prision time.


Stil havent llookd into spel chek, hav u?

Reply
Sep 5, 2020 22:26:14   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Tiptop789 wrote:
Another idiotic makes no sense comment from you. Sentences should have a verb. When you write a sentence, it should convey a thought or idea, make a statement. Your do neither. We'll start easy. Bob ____ (loves, sees,likes) the color of the ____ (flag, car, horse). See if you can construct a proper sentence.


See if you can construct one, hotshot. I believe this belongs to you:

Another idiotic makes no sense comment from you. Sentences should have a verb. When you write a sentence, it should convey a thought or idea, make a statement. Your do neither.

Let's see.... there should be a comma after idiotic. Third sentence is a run-on. Yours, not Your.
See if you can construct a proper sentence yourself.
You also treated us to this example of your vast grammatical skills:

Actually, they do. In this election, tump is the con, the liar, the pretender. But to trump loyalists, all they see is someone they perceive to be a savior.
Last time I looked, proper nouns are capitalized. They are also most generally spelled correctly by those who claim to be practitioners of "proper grammar."

Try again.

Reply
Sep 5, 2020 22:36:02   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Tiptop789 wrote:
Zip your pie hole. You appear to knows all about hoes? Must be a reason for that. You don't seem to know a lot about grammar, probably a reason for that. And last, you seem to know very little about current events. Good thing they did away with a pole test, you would fail big time. Lol. You're being conned by trump. Haha


Given your penchant for third grade mistakes, you have no business commenting on anyone else's grammar; (with the possible exception of another brainless Liberal's futile attempt at erudition.)

Reply
Sep 6, 2020 07:55:00   #
JIM BETHEA
 

Reply
 
 
Sep 6, 2020 09:55:41   #
JimMe
 
Tiptop789 wrote:
Actually, they do. In this election, tump is the con, the liar, the pretender. But to trump loyalists, all they see is someone they perceive to be a savior. The only one he's interested in saving is himself. His (you) supporters are being conned.



Actually, we Vote/Support Our Pres because he does what we were hoping he'd do... We weren't and aren't and won't be "conned" by Trump because he is who we want and is doing what we want him to do... But chances are you'll never understand...

Reply
Sep 7, 2020 01:58:52   #
Radiance3
 
Carol Kelly wrote:
This birth thing needs to be revisited. Her parents were aliens when she was born here. Under the present ruling on Kamala and Obama, in 2024 we could have an Egyptian President born while his parents were here in a university and then removed to Egypt until he returned here to run for President of the United States. I have nothing against Egyptians, just using as an example. This issue MUST be revisited.
Kamala was not born into poverty as portrayed in “I was that girl” testimony. Her Jamaican antecedents owned slaves. Her parents were both from wealthy families.
She has gotten where she is by the most devious manner. She would be another Obama, rest assured, because within weeks of sleepy Joe’s inauguration, he would suddenly be found incompetent if he stepped over their line once and, voila! our first female president and what a leader she would be. The middle class would disappear.
Maybe we’d be on a reservation somewhere. THIS ISSUE MUST BE RESOLVED now.
This birth thing needs to be revisited. Her paren... (show quote)

=================
Here are various reasons why Kamala is not considered a US citizen:

The 14th Amendment requires ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof’? Not owing allegiance to anyone else.
Harris does not qualify as a birth citizen of this country.

In addition, every non-US parent of a baby born in the U.S. has natural citizenship rights for himself and his child based upon the citizenship laws of his home country. Those rights cannot be usurped just because a citizen is a student in America. In Donald Jasper Harris’ case, that is Jamaica. Jamaican law is very clear about Kamala’s citizenship at birth:

“Every person born outside Jamaica shall become a citizen of Jamaica . . . on that the date of his birth.”
Kamala is subject to the jurisdiction of Jamaica.


Test for birth right of Harris:
1. Birth parents are citizens of, and subject to the laws of, a foreign country; which is Jamaica, and mother to India.
2. Child was born in the U.S.?
YES, Kamala’s birth certificate says she was born at Kaiser Foundation Hospital at 9:28pm on Oct. 20, 1964
2. Birth parents are citizens of, and subject to the laws of, a foreign country; YES.
YES, Kamala’s birth certificate shows that her father Donald is a citizen of Jamaica and her mother Gopalan is from India.

3. Birth parents have “a permanent domicile and residence in the United States;”
NO, a student residence is generally not considered a permanent domicile and residence. Rather, for a college student, for example, a home residence is considered his legal domicile while his student abode is temporary.
For example, a student cannot list her student housing residence in another state in order to qualify for in-state tuition. Likewise, a student cannot claim a student address as permanent domicile to meet the Wong rule and enable his or her newborn to become a U.S. citizen!

When Kamala was 12, her mother moved Kamala and her sister to Canada for graduate work at McGill University. Kamala attended high school in Westmount, Quebec, graduating in 1981. Did she claim Canadian citizenship during that period? That would put her under the jurisdication of the British Crown with regard to the Wong test.
The parent of Kamala do not qualify as permanent residence.
After graduating high school in Canada, Kamala applied for TN visa to study in the United States. What is a TN visa? It is a visa given to NAFTA professionals traveler of Canada and Mexican citizens to travel to the United States. Why will Harris use TN VISA if she is a US citizen?

In addition, Harris, Donald moved from place without permanent intent to stay.
Occasionally, a student residence can be used as legal domicile, if the person has the provable intent to make it permanent. Even that was not the case with Donald Harris. Kamala was born in 1964. Donald received his PhD at Berkeley in 1966, two years later, then they moved to the University of Illinois (Asst. Prof., 1966-67), then Northwestern (Asst. Prof., 1967-68), then University of Wisconsin (Assoc. Prof., 1968-72), then Stanford (Econ. Prof., 1978-98). The evidence is clear that Donald had no intention of making his Berkeley address at the time of Kamala’s birth his legal domicile.

Reply
Sep 7, 2020 08:16:19   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Radiance3 wrote:
=================
Here are various reasons why Kamala is not considered a US citizen:

The 14th Amendment requires ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof’? Not owing allegiance to anyone else.
Harris does not qualify as a birth citizen of this country.

In addition, every non-US parent of a baby born in the U.S. has natural citizenship rights for himself and his child based upon the citizenship laws of his home country. Those rights cannot be usurped just because a citizen is a student in America. In Donald Jasper Harris’ case, that is Jamaica. Jamaican law is very clear about Kamala’s citizenship at birth:

“Every person born outside Jamaica shall become a citizen of Jamaica . . . on that the date of his birth.”
Kamala is subject to the jurisdiction of Jamaica.


Test for birth right of Harris:
1. Birth parents are citizens of, and subject to the laws of, a foreign country; which is Jamaica, and mother to India.
2. Child was born in the U.S.?
YES, Kamala’s birth certificate says she was born at Kaiser Foundation Hospital at 9:28pm on Oct. 20, 1964
2. Birth parents are citizens of, and subject to the laws of, a foreign country; YES.
YES, Kamala’s birth certificate shows that her father Donald is a citizen of Jamaica and her mother Gopalan is from India.

3. Birth parents have “a permanent domicile and residence in the United States;”
NO, a student residence is generally not considered a permanent domicile and residence. Rather, for a college student, for example, a home residence is considered his legal domicile while his student abode is temporary.
For example, a student cannot list her student housing residence in another state in order to qualify for in-state tuition. Likewise, a student cannot claim a student address as permanent domicile to meet the Wong rule and enable his or her newborn to become a U.S. citizen!

When Kamala was 12, her mother moved Kamala and her sister to Canada for graduate work at McGill University. Kamala attended high school in Westmount, Quebec, graduating in 1981. Did she claim Canadian citizenship during that period? That would put her under the jurisdication of the British Crown with regard to the Wong test.
The parent of Kamala do not qualify as permanent residence.
After graduating high school in Canada, Kamala applied for TN visa to study in the United States. What is a TN visa? It is a visa given to NAFTA professionals traveler of Canada and Mexican citizens to travel to the United States. Why will Harris use TN VISA if she is a US citizen?

In addition, Harris, Donald moved from place without permanent intent to stay.
Occasionally, a student residence can be used as legal domicile, if the person has the provable intent to make it permanent. Even that was not the case with Donald Harris. Kamala was born in 1964. Donald received his PhD at Berkeley in 1966, two years later, then they moved to the University of Illinois (Asst. Prof., 1966-67), then Northwestern (Asst. Prof., 1967-68), then University of Wisconsin (Assoc. Prof., 1968-72), then Stanford (Econ. Prof., 1978-98). The evidence is clear that Donald had no intention of making his Berkeley address at the time of Kamala’s birth his legal domicile.
================= br i Here are various reasons w... (show quote)


Thorough, accurate, and disqualifying for Harrass.
Both Biden and Harrass are unfit to run for president.

Reply
Sep 7, 2020 08:55:02   #
Radiance3
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Thorough, accurate, and disqualifying for Harrass.
Both Biden and Harrass are unfit to run for president.

===============
That is why I think we have constitutional problem on this "birth citizen", unless Congress legislate, signed by our president, clarifying this very obscure part of Article XIV .
In the Citizens Clause, 1st part of the XIV Amendment.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Parents of Kamala are subject to the jurisdiction of Jamaica, and India. Jamaica law makes Kamala, though born in foreign country, is still subject to the jurisdiction of Jamaica.

If Congress don't fix this, foreigners with plenty of money to buy votes of people could usurp and run our country. How do you like that?

Reply
 
 
Sep 7, 2020 09:23:03   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Radiance3 wrote:
===============
That is why I think we have constitutional problem on this "birth citizen", unless Congress legislate, signed by our president, clarifying this very obscure part of Article XIV .
In the Citizens Clause, 1st part of the XIV Amendment.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Parents of Kamala are subject to the jurisdiction of Jamaica, and India. Jamaica law makes Kamala, though born in foreign country, is still subject to the jurisdiction of Jamaica.

If Congress don't fix this, foreigners with plenty of money to buy votes of people could usurp and run our country. How do you like that?
=============== br i That is why I think we have ... (show quote)


I don't like that, it's happening already.

Reply
Sep 7, 2020 19:40:38   #
Radiance3
 
Leave the gun. Take the cannoli. wrote:
Per Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) “there is no issue as to whether or not she is an American citizen". "She was born in the United States in 1964 to parents who were legally present. Under the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent, she is unequivocally an American citizen."

ANOTHER CONSPIRACY THEORY DOWN THE DRAIN.

===============
According to Lindsey Graham "Kamala was born in the United States in 1964 to parents who were legally present."

I think it is a dumb answer. Of course they were present, that was why their egg was dropped here.

Senator Graham, if that was your answer, it does not prove the allegiance as required by the constitution. Her father's allegiance was to Jamaica, and her mother's allegiance was to India. They were both students. Not permanent residence. Senator Graham, please step aside and let other GOP senate member take over.

Reply
Sep 7, 2020 19:50:30   #
Sicilianthing
 
Radiance3 wrote:
===============
According to Lindsey Graham "Kamala was born in the United States in 1964 to parents who were legally present."

I think it is a dumb answer. Of course they were present, that was why their egg was dropped here.

Senator Graham, if that was your answer, it does not prove the allegiance as required by the constitution. Her father's allegiance was to Jamaica, and her mother's allegiance was to India. They were both students. Not permanent residence. Senator Graham, please step aside and let other GOP senate member take over.
=============== br i According to Lindsey Graham ... (show quote)


>>>

Blame Trump and King Rat Barr for allowing her to continue.

Reply
Sep 7, 2020 23:16:53   #
Radiance3
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

Blame Trump and King Rat Barr for allowing her to continue.


=================
DOJ Barr has been attacked by the communist democrats when talking to the president. That is why Barr has not been able to officially report properly to the president. The protocol there is DOJ Barr is under the Executive Branch. But because the LEFT constantly attacks Barr, he is unable to communicate effectively with the president.

Of course Barr must report to the Executive Branch. That is the protocol. The president sets policies and the Dept heads follow. They can make their own within the approval of the president.

When Barrack Obama was president, he dictated to Holder all actions that he did at the justice department. That is why the FAST AND FURIOUS happened which killed our own border Patrol Agent. That was Barack's and Holders dumb ideas. No political party stopped and attacked them.

But now DOJ could not even communicate with the president without being attacked by the communist democrats.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 9 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.