A Constitutional Crisis: Birth of Kamala Harris and Qualification for a VP
Sep 4, 2020 09:23:10 #
The real Kamala Harris:
Kamala Harris has no integrity, an impostor, unreliable and deceptive. She spins where ever the wind blows in her favor. She used a knee pad to move her up. During the primary, she called Joe a "r****t", and a sex predator. She h**es Catholics, and suggested one time that Catholics do not fit for higher office. But now she praises Joe, a Catholic who was excommunicated from the Catholic Church due to his allegiance to PP a******ns.
Born on Oct. 20, 1964, her parents with student visas were not yet citizens, and not yet considered permanent legal residence. She could be not be a VP based on a natural born citizen requirement. Natural born citizen used to be interpreted as those born in the US with US citizen parents. Recently been altered by many legal experts' interpretations and Court cases, that natural born are those born in the US. Therefore all anchor babies could assume the office of a VP or the president of the US?
These challenges started on when Barack Obama run for p**********l office in 2008. So many Court cases cited and Court challenges that only born in the US regardless of foreign allegiance and status. I think "natural born" case must be clearly defined only by Congress legislative process and not by the Courts.
-----------------------
Kamala Harris qualifies as an Anchor baby?
CORRUPTION, E******NS, U. S. POLITICSAugust 12, 2020
Is Kamala Harris an i*****l a***n? She even fails the “anchor baby” test!
Kamala Harris fails even the “anchor baby” claim
Some Kamala-defenders claim she is an anchor baby and qualified for U.S. citizenship solely by her place of birth.
In the last 24 hours, our exposé of Kamala’s bogus citizenship claims, we have received some push back by an almost visceral “she’s an anchor baby!” reaction to the question of Kamala Harris’ citizenship. It should not be a question at all if Kamala were being sincere about her interest to serve the American public.
Given her father Donald’s resume, she looks like just another g***med recruit for the Pilgrims Society and their offspring at the U.N. and Council on Foreign Relations.
At best, the anchor baby concept is thin legal theory.
It takes a leap of logic to interpret the 13th Amendment to allow for citizenship by arguing that a newborn baby is under the jurisdiction of the U.S. at birth merely by virtual of his or her presence in the U.S.
Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”[10]
In 1898, the U.S. Supreme Court did take a precedent steps to clarify what “jurisdiction” meant in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898). The Wong circumstances were not dissimilar to Kamala’s whose father was a PhD graduate student at the University of California Berkeley.
In addition, every non-US parent of a baby born in the U.S. has natural citizenship rights for himself and his child based upon the citizenship laws of his home country. Those rights cannot be usurped just because a citizen is a student in America.
In Donald Jasper Harris’ case, that is Jamaica. Jamaican law is very clear about Kamala’s citizenship at birth:
“Every person born outside Jamaica shall become a citizen of Jamaica . . . on that the date of his birth.”
Section 3C(b), Citizenship by decent, Jamaica (Constitution) Order in Council 1962. (Jul. 25, 1962). Caribbean and North Atlantic Territories, Statutory Instruments, 1962 No. 1550, Amendments through 2011 appended. Queen Elizabeth and Privy Council.
India has a similar law if one chooses to focus on Kamala’s Indian mother’s citizenship instead. See Part II, Sec. 5, Citizenship. The Constitution of India. (Nov. 9, 2015). Government of India, Ministry of Law and Justice.
So, unambiguously, by the laws of citizenship in Donald’s Jamaica, Kamala was born with Jamaican citizenship.
The open question remains whether she is a dual citizen by virtue of her birth in the United States.
To answer this we must turn to the 14th Amendment and the Supreme Court’s clarification of “jurisdiction” in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).
The Wong Kim Ark decision created a simple test for jurisdiction for which all the elements must be true before it applies:
1. Child was born in the U.S;
2. Birth parents are citizens of, and subject to the laws of, a foreign country;
3. Birth parents have “a permanent domicile and residence in the United States;”
4. Birth parents “are carrying on business;” and
5. Birth parents “ are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity” by the country of their citizenship”
This is Kamala’s test to qualify as an “anchor baby:”
1. Child was born in the U.S.?
YES, Kamala’s birth certificate says she was born at Kaiser Foundation Hospital at 9:28pm on Oct. 20, 1964
2. Birth parents are citizens of, and subject to the laws of, a foreign country;
YES, Kamala’s birth certificate shows that her father Donald is a citizen of Jamaica and her mother Gopalan is from India.
3. Birth parents have “a permanent domicile and residence in the United States;”
NO, a student residence is generally not considered a permanent domicile and residence. Rather, for a college student, for example, a home residence is considered his legal domicile while his student abode is temporary. For example, a student cannot list her student housing residence in another state in order to qualify for in-state tuition. Likewise, a student cannot claim a student address as permanent domicile to meet the Wong rule and enable his or her newborn to become a U.S. citizen!
When Kamala was 12, her mother moved Kamala and her sister to Canada for graduate work at McGill University. Kamala attended high school in Westmount, Quebec, graduating in 1981. Did she claim Canadian citizenship during that period? That would put her under the jurisdication of the British Crown with regard to the Wong test.
Occasionally, a student residence can be used as legal domicile, if the person has the provable intent to make it permanent. Even that was not the case with Donald Harris. Kamala was born in 1964. Donald received his PhD at Berkeley in 1966, two years later, then they moved to the University of Illinois (Asst. Prof., 1966-67), then Northwestern (Asst. Prof., 1967-68), then University of Wisconsin (Assoc. Prof., 1968-72), then Stanford (Econ. Prof., 1978-98). The evidence is clear that Donald had no intention of making his Berkeley address at the time of Kamala’s birth his legal domicile..
Therefore, Kamala does not qualify as a U.S. Citizen under Wong based on the domicile test.
4. Birth parents “are carrying on business;” and
NO. Donald Jasper Harris was a full time PhD student at Berkeley when Kamala was born. See also Kamala’s birth certificate. Therefore, Kamala does not qualify as a U.S. Citizen under Wong based on the business test.
5. Birth parents “ are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity” by the country of their citizenship”
NO, the evidence is clear that Donald Jasper Harris was working for the U.N. and Jamaican government. His resume is a litany of relationships to foreign governments: Shell Scholar (Jamaica), 1957; Issa Scholar (Jamaica), 1961; Faculty Fellow, Economics, Cambridge University, England, 1966; Ford Foundation Visiting Fellow, Delhi School of Economics, India, 1968; Associate Fellow, Clare Hall, Cambridge University, England, 1969, 1971; Distinguished Visiting Professor, Yale University, 1977-78; Associate Fellow, Trinity College, Cambridge University, England, 1982; National Research Council-Ford Foundation Fellow, 1984-85; Fulbright Scholar, Brazil, 1990, 1991; Fulbright Scholar, Mexico, 1992; Visiting Scholar, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, 1993-94.
Donald’s resume states “Consultant to international agencies (UN, UNCTAD, UNDP, IDB, World Bank), governments, and private foundations.”
Therefore, Kamala fails this test as well. Her father was indeed being directed by non-US powers, including the U.N., by virtue of not passing the “not a diplomat or official capacity” test.
.
No proof of citizenship
Has Kamala become a naturalized American citizen?
She has produced no record of that, as was her duty the first time she ran for public office in California, and certainly is her duty now that she is the presumed Biden vice p**********l running mate.
Put up, or shut up Kamala. We’re tired of having to dig around in your past because you are hiding secrets.
Grab your Kamala Harris independent media kit under the headline link below and spread around your information downline:
Biden picks not black-not eligible Kamala Harris as VP nominee.
Kamala Harris fails even the “anchor baby” claim Some Kamala-defenders claim she is an anchor baby and qualified for U.S. citizenship solely by her place of birth. In the last 24 hours, our exposé.
Kamala Harris has no integrity, an impostor, unreliable and deceptive. She spins where ever the wind blows in her favor. She used a knee pad to move her up. During the primary, she called Joe a "r****t", and a sex predator. She h**es Catholics, and suggested one time that Catholics do not fit for higher office. But now she praises Joe, a Catholic who was excommunicated from the Catholic Church due to his allegiance to PP a******ns.
Born on Oct. 20, 1964, her parents with student visas were not yet citizens, and not yet considered permanent legal residence. She could be not be a VP based on a natural born citizen requirement. Natural born citizen used to be interpreted as those born in the US with US citizen parents. Recently been altered by many legal experts' interpretations and Court cases, that natural born are those born in the US. Therefore all anchor babies could assume the office of a VP or the president of the US?
These challenges started on when Barack Obama run for p**********l office in 2008. So many Court cases cited and Court challenges that only born in the US regardless of foreign allegiance and status. I think "natural born" case must be clearly defined only by Congress legislative process and not by the Courts.
-----------------------
Kamala Harris qualifies as an Anchor baby?
CORRUPTION, E******NS, U. S. POLITICSAugust 12, 2020
Is Kamala Harris an i*****l a***n? She even fails the “anchor baby” test!
Kamala Harris fails even the “anchor baby” claim
Some Kamala-defenders claim she is an anchor baby and qualified for U.S. citizenship solely by her place of birth.
In the last 24 hours, our exposé of Kamala’s bogus citizenship claims, we have received some push back by an almost visceral “she’s an anchor baby!” reaction to the question of Kamala Harris’ citizenship. It should not be a question at all if Kamala were being sincere about her interest to serve the American public.
Given her father Donald’s resume, she looks like just another g***med recruit for the Pilgrims Society and their offspring at the U.N. and Council on Foreign Relations.
At best, the anchor baby concept is thin legal theory.
It takes a leap of logic to interpret the 13th Amendment to allow for citizenship by arguing that a newborn baby is under the jurisdiction of the U.S. at birth merely by virtual of his or her presence in the U.S.
Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”[10]
In 1898, the U.S. Supreme Court did take a precedent steps to clarify what “jurisdiction” meant in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898). The Wong circumstances were not dissimilar to Kamala’s whose father was a PhD graduate student at the University of California Berkeley.
In addition, every non-US parent of a baby born in the U.S. has natural citizenship rights for himself and his child based upon the citizenship laws of his home country. Those rights cannot be usurped just because a citizen is a student in America.
In Donald Jasper Harris’ case, that is Jamaica. Jamaican law is very clear about Kamala’s citizenship at birth:
“Every person born outside Jamaica shall become a citizen of Jamaica . . . on that the date of his birth.”
Section 3C(b), Citizenship by decent, Jamaica (Constitution) Order in Council 1962. (Jul. 25, 1962). Caribbean and North Atlantic Territories, Statutory Instruments, 1962 No. 1550, Amendments through 2011 appended. Queen Elizabeth and Privy Council.
India has a similar law if one chooses to focus on Kamala’s Indian mother’s citizenship instead. See Part II, Sec. 5, Citizenship. The Constitution of India. (Nov. 9, 2015). Government of India, Ministry of Law and Justice.
So, unambiguously, by the laws of citizenship in Donald’s Jamaica, Kamala was born with Jamaican citizenship.
The open question remains whether she is a dual citizen by virtue of her birth in the United States.
To answer this we must turn to the 14th Amendment and the Supreme Court’s clarification of “jurisdiction” in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898).
The Wong Kim Ark decision created a simple test for jurisdiction for which all the elements must be true before it applies:
1. Child was born in the U.S;
2. Birth parents are citizens of, and subject to the laws of, a foreign country;
3. Birth parents have “a permanent domicile and residence in the United States;”
4. Birth parents “are carrying on business;” and
5. Birth parents “ are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity” by the country of their citizenship”
This is Kamala’s test to qualify as an “anchor baby:”
1. Child was born in the U.S.?
YES, Kamala’s birth certificate says she was born at Kaiser Foundation Hospital at 9:28pm on Oct. 20, 1964
2. Birth parents are citizens of, and subject to the laws of, a foreign country;
YES, Kamala’s birth certificate shows that her father Donald is a citizen of Jamaica and her mother Gopalan is from India.
3. Birth parents have “a permanent domicile and residence in the United States;”
NO, a student residence is generally not considered a permanent domicile and residence. Rather, for a college student, for example, a home residence is considered his legal domicile while his student abode is temporary. For example, a student cannot list her student housing residence in another state in order to qualify for in-state tuition. Likewise, a student cannot claim a student address as permanent domicile to meet the Wong rule and enable his or her newborn to become a U.S. citizen!
When Kamala was 12, her mother moved Kamala and her sister to Canada for graduate work at McGill University. Kamala attended high school in Westmount, Quebec, graduating in 1981. Did she claim Canadian citizenship during that period? That would put her under the jurisdication of the British Crown with regard to the Wong test.
Occasionally, a student residence can be used as legal domicile, if the person has the provable intent to make it permanent. Even that was not the case with Donald Harris. Kamala was born in 1964. Donald received his PhD at Berkeley in 1966, two years later, then they moved to the University of Illinois (Asst. Prof., 1966-67), then Northwestern (Asst. Prof., 1967-68), then University of Wisconsin (Assoc. Prof., 1968-72), then Stanford (Econ. Prof., 1978-98). The evidence is clear that Donald had no intention of making his Berkeley address at the time of Kamala’s birth his legal domicile..
Therefore, Kamala does not qualify as a U.S. Citizen under Wong based on the domicile test.
4. Birth parents “are carrying on business;” and
NO. Donald Jasper Harris was a full time PhD student at Berkeley when Kamala was born. See also Kamala’s birth certificate. Therefore, Kamala does not qualify as a U.S. Citizen under Wong based on the business test.
5. Birth parents “ are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity” by the country of their citizenship”
NO, the evidence is clear that Donald Jasper Harris was working for the U.N. and Jamaican government. His resume is a litany of relationships to foreign governments: Shell Scholar (Jamaica), 1957; Issa Scholar (Jamaica), 1961; Faculty Fellow, Economics, Cambridge University, England, 1966; Ford Foundation Visiting Fellow, Delhi School of Economics, India, 1968; Associate Fellow, Clare Hall, Cambridge University, England, 1969, 1971; Distinguished Visiting Professor, Yale University, 1977-78; Associate Fellow, Trinity College, Cambridge University, England, 1982; National Research Council-Ford Foundation Fellow, 1984-85; Fulbright Scholar, Brazil, 1990, 1991; Fulbright Scholar, Mexico, 1992; Visiting Scholar, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, 1993-94.
Donald’s resume states “Consultant to international agencies (UN, UNCTAD, UNDP, IDB, World Bank), governments, and private foundations.”
Therefore, Kamala fails this test as well. Her father was indeed being directed by non-US powers, including the U.N., by virtue of not passing the “not a diplomat or official capacity” test.
.
No proof of citizenship
Has Kamala become a naturalized American citizen?
She has produced no record of that, as was her duty the first time she ran for public office in California, and certainly is her duty now that she is the presumed Biden vice p**********l running mate.
Put up, or shut up Kamala. We’re tired of having to dig around in your past because you are hiding secrets.
Grab your Kamala Harris independent media kit under the headline link below and spread around your information downline:
Biden picks not black-not eligible Kamala Harris as VP nominee.
Kamala Harris fails even the “anchor baby” claim Some Kamala-defenders claim she is an anchor baby and qualified for U.S. citizenship solely by her place of birth. In the last 24 hours, our exposé.
Sep 4, 2020 09:49:51 #
Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.
Loc: Pa
Radiance3 wrote:
i The real Kamala Harris: br Kamala Harris has no... (show quote)
Per Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) “there is no issue as to whether or not she is an American citizen". "She was born in the United States in 1964 to parents who were legally present. Under the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent, she is unequivocally an American citizen."
ANOTHER CONSPIRACY THEORY DOWN THE DRAIN.
Sep 4, 2020 09:51:09 #
Radiance3 wrote:
i The real Kamala Harris: br Kamala Harris has no... (show quote)
All one has to do is be born hear she's far more American than trump
Sep 4, 2020 10:06:51 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
Radiance3 wrote:
i The real Kamala Harris: br Kamala Harris has no... (show quote)
Under current law she is a U.S. citizen. doesn't change the fact that she's a political ho.
Sep 4, 2020 10:09:15 #
Tiptop789
Loc: State of Denial
Radiance3 wrote:
i The real Kamala Harris: br Kamala Harris has no... (show quote)
You should retire this line of thinking, it makes you look silly.
Sep 4, 2020 10:10:30 #
Tiptop789
Loc: State of Denial
JFlorio wrote:
Under current law she is a U.S. citizen. doesn't change the fact that she's a political ho.
Jimbo, so beneath you. I think your better than this. Btw, hope you got your money out b4 things started going south?
Sep 4, 2020 10:14:59 #
Leave the gun. Take the cannoli. wrote:
Per Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) “there is no issue as to whether or not she is an American citizen". "She was born in the United States in 1964 to parents who were legally present. Under the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent, she is unequivocally an American citizen."
ANOTHER CONSPIRACY THEORY DOWN THE DRAIN.
ANOTHER CONSPIRACY THEORY DOWN THE DRAIN.
================
Her parents were on student Visas. And not yet permanent residents, or citizens. Lindsey's interpretation does not change the constitutional problem on this issue. Courts could not change the constitution. Only Congress could clearly put this crisis clearly thru legislative process. Graham is not the constitution, and he is unreliable. For the sake of all Americans, the interpretations and clarifications must come from Congress. No court or any legal expert could change the process of the Constitution.
Without Congressional Amendment, clearly describing a "natural born", this problem will always come up. That is why it is constitutional crisis.
Sep 4, 2020 10:17:41 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
Tiptop789 wrote:
Jimbo, so beneath you. I think your better than this. Btw, hope you got your money out b4 things started going south?
Could care less your multiple personality opinions of me. She's still a ho. She didn't get the nick name heels up Harris at church. I've pulled much of my profit out of the market. Buying Apple and calls that don't expire until after the e******n.
Sep 4, 2020 10:18:20 #
Leave the gun. Take the cannoli. wrote:
ANOTHER CONSPIRACY THEORY DOWN THE DRAIN.
ANOTHER CONSPIRACY THEORY DOWN THE DRAIN.
"ANOTHER STUPID CONSPIRACY THEORY DOWN THE DRAIN"
There, fixed it for ya
Sep 4, 2020 10:22:03 #
JFlorio wrote:
Could care less your multiple personality opinions of me. She's still a ho. She didn't get the nick name heels up Harris at church. I've pulled much of my profit out of the market. Buying Apple and calls that don't expire until after the e******n.
==============
For stocks, you did a great move. Sold the Apple for profit and bought the lower shares. They are moving up today.
Sep 4, 2020 10:31:30 #
Leave the gun. Take the cannoli. wrote:
Per Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) “there is no issue as to whether or not she is an American citizen". "She was born in the United States in 1964 to parents who were legally present. Under the Constitution and Supreme Court precedent, she is unequivocally an American citizen."
ANOTHER CONSPIRACY THEORY DOWN THE DRAIN.
ANOTHER CONSPIRACY THEORY DOWN THE DRAIN.
This birth thing needs to be revisited. Her parents were aliens when she was born here. Under the present ruling on Kamala and Obama, in 2024 we could have an Egyptian President born while his parents were here in a university and then removed to Egypt until he returned here to run for President of the United States. I have nothing against Egyptians, just using as an example. This issue MUST be revisited.
Kamala was not born into poverty as portrayed in “I was that girl” testimony. Her Jamaican antecedents owned s***es. Her parents were both from wealthy families.
She has gotten where she is by the most devious manner. She would be another Obama, rest assured, because within weeks of sleepy Joe’s inauguration, he would suddenly be found incompetent if he stepped over their line once and, voila! our first female president and what a leader she would be. The middle class would disappear.
Maybe we’d be on a reservation somewhere. THIS ISSUE MUST BE RESOLVED now.
Sep 4, 2020 10:33:57 #
woodguru wrote:
"ANOTHER STUPID CONSPIRACY THEORY DOWN THE DRAIN"
There, fixed it for ya
There, fixed it for ya
You’re unbelievable.
Sep 4, 2020 10:36:10 #
JFlorio wrote:
Could care less your multiple personality opinions of me. She's still a ho. She didn't get the nick name heels up Harris at church. I've pulled much of my profit out of the market. Buying Apple and calls that don't expire until after the e******n.
Yes, she still is that. Her family is so white, she can’t possibly run on a minority ticket. We kept our mouths shut about Obama, but we can’t do that this time. If we must shout to the rooftops.
Sep 4, 2020 10:39:07 #
Carol Kelly wrote:
This birth thing needs to be revisited. Her paren... (show quote)
It is she was born in the us and unlike trump she loves America,
Trumps comited do many felony's when he leaves office all he has left is prision time.
Sep 4, 2020 10:51:23 #
Leave the gun. Take the cannoli.
Loc: Pa
JFlorio wrote:
Could care less your multiple personality opinions of me. She's still a ho. She didn't get the nick name heels up Harris at church. I've pulled much of my profit out of the market. Buying Apple and calls that don't expire until after the e******n.
Oh, you want to argue morality? You're on shaky ground here.
Which is worse - sleeping your way TO the top or sleeping FROM the top using your position of power and wealth?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.