One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
For me, A Trump Supporter is like the person who argues Earth is flat or that 2+2=5: it is not an opinion or an insult to say they are wrong
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Aug 12, 2020 08:47:47   #
zombinis3 Loc: Southwest
 
Ranger7374 wrote:
I agree with most of your response but disagree with "..for this administration" for the reason that this administration is fighting fire with fire. And they're pretty good at it. For the opp would not have conservatives posting on here if it weren't true.

See conservatives are concerned with the government getting out of their lives. Why must they be in every aspect of our lives? But the Dems see the control and money in butting into our lives.

That's how it was for a long time. So the conservatives became apathetic. Until Obama became president. Then the conservatives started speaking out and Trump won.

Then he started making real change that we could see. And with great hatred the Dems tried to discredit him and destroy him and whosoever would support him. And when the question was asked, " why do you hate him so much" there was no formative direct answer instead it was suspicion and fear.

So here we are. Two schools of thought clashing and instead of coming to a compromise, the mud slinging gets worse, and our democracy suffers.

We need to sit down at the table and iron out our differences in such a way that we can all live in peace.

If you look back on the 2016 election you would find that Trump was always on the defense. He never attacked unless he was attacked upon.

With that said, I still don't understand why after all that has happened, I don't understand why we all can't come to the table and focus on the subject at hand. Instead they would rather Stonewall each other and that's pathetic.

So would you rather work with him or destroy the country? Both Dems and Republicans have good ideas too bad they would rather fight with each other than govern.
I agree with most of your response but disagree wi... (show quote)


"See conservatives are concerned with the government getting out of their lives. Why must they be in every aspect of our lives? But the Dems see the control and money in butting into our lives."

I do have to agree with what some of this statement. The government shouldn't have to be in every aspect of our lives. I think you agree with this
the main concern of govenment is to make laws that benefit everyone, or whenever the need is required to aid or protect its citizens. Sometimes it is needed to be involved.
The rest are going to be examples I'm not attempting to change the direction of the conversation.

1st example business are in for the profit , for that they have to do things cheaper then the competition. Some companies will make a decision on how to get rid of dangerous waste products. The cheapest way is just to dump the waste in a flowing river , the right way is to put it into a confined area. How do you ensure that the right way is followed. The state can pass regulation to ensure that its done properly. The only problem is that river flows into another state which doesn't have the need. Like must companies it is in for the profit which way will the company go with the plant? This is the reason that the fed has to make regulations because they can be enforced in multiple states.

2nd example Alot of manufacturing has left the country because of the need for profit. Because the rules that govern the payment of hourly worker and the regulations. Quality control at these companies is a need. Example IV solutions to ensure that the product is as pure as possible. With regulations at least the man in the street has a possible chance to get satisfaction if wronged. The Fed can enforce these regulations.

Those above are examples of where the Fed needs to be involved, the last one is an example of when the Fed shouldn't have been involved.

3rd example Roe vs Wade because of the stigma of shame it caused for single parents because of a pregnancy out of wedlock. It caused the individual or the parents to belive that they had failed. The Fed got involved because the number of persons who were getting hurt because of the culture at the time was forcing people to get dangerous abortions. The prossible chance of adoptions may have not been known/or considered to the few.
The only reason the fed got involved here is because the rules had to be enforced nationally.
Your belief system is to be used as guide for the individual not to enforce those belief on others. As for abortion for population control or gender isn't right but using the fed or state governments to control it isn't ether.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.