Ten Commandments monument torn down.
son of witless wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/montana-man-ten-commandments-monument-toppling-charge
It had no business on public property anyway. It is a violation of the first amendment.-
Kevyn wrote:
It had no business on public property anyway. It is a violation of the first amendment.-
Godless savages like you support should be executed on sight.
Kevyn wrote:
It had no business on public property anyway. It is a violation of the first amendment.-
Another endorsement for crime when you dislike something. That is all I have seen from Liberals on OPP, when a statue or monument is attacked by a violent thug. Liberals can truly rationalize anything at all to excuse any criminal act, when they agree with the result.
Just like the rationalization when they kill an unborn child. Liberals are really such reasonable fellows. It must be nice always being reasonable, one can then always give a really good reason for anything one wants to do.
I do not like reasonable people. I believe I will stay unreasonable.
archie bunker wrote:
Godless savages like you support should be executed on sight.
I wouldn't say Kevyn should be executed. Kevyn will get his reward in the next life. The guy who pulled down the monument might be punished severely when he gets to prison.
Kevyn wrote:
It had no business on public property anyway. It is a violation of the first amendment.-
Explain how each of the Ten Commandments or the Ten Commandments as a whole violate the 1st amendment.
Here, I'll make it easy for you,
Ten Commandments
I - You shall have no other gods before Me.
II - You shall make no idols.
III - You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain.
IV - Keep the Sabbath day holy.
V - Honor your father and your mother.
VI - You shall not murder.
VII - You shall not commit adultery.
VIII - You shall not steal.
IX - You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
X - You shall not covet.
son of witless wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/montana-man-ten-commandments-monument-toppling-charge
They should have just chiseled out 'thou shall not commit adultery' and left it alone...
Blade_Runner wrote:
Explain how each of the Ten Commandments or the Ten Commandments as a whole violate the 1st amendment.
Here, I'll make it easy for you,
Ten Commandments
I - You shall have no other gods before Me.
II - You shall make no idols.
III - You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain.
IV - Keep the Sabbath day holy.
V - Honor your father and your mother.
VI - You shall not murder.
VII - You shall not commit adultery.
VIII - You shall not steal.
IX - You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
X - You shall not covet.
Explain how each of the Ten Commandments or the Te... (
show quote)
Yes it's really a dangerous monument! Give me a break! These radicals need to be put in jail, PERIOD!!
PeterS wrote:
They should have just chiseled out 'thou shall not commit adultery' and left it alone...
Why? 3000 years ago God found favor with an adulterer and murderer, anointed him king, and this king became the greatest of the Hebrew kings. He founded the kingdom of Israel and Judah.
son of witless wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/us/montana-man-ten-commandments-monument-toppling-charge
Tearing down the ten commandments doesn't make them disappear.
Blade_Runner wrote:
Explain how each of the Ten Commandments or the Ten Commandments as a whole violate the 1st amendment.
Here, I'll make it easy for you,
Ten Commandments
I - You shall have no other gods before Me.
II - You shall make no idols.
III - You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain.
IV - Keep the Sabbath day holy.
V - Honor your father and your mother.
VI - You shall not murder.
VII - You shall not commit adultery.
VIII - You shall not steal.
IX - You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
X - You shall not covet.
Explain how each of the Ten Commandments or the Te... (
show quote)
Snip>>>What does it mean to bear false witness?
“Thou shalt not bear false witness” forbids: “1. Speaking falsely in any matter, lying, equivocating, and any way devising and designing to deceive our neighbor. ... Speaking unjustly against our neighbor, to the prejudice of his reputation; and (which involves the guilty of both).There is not a day that goes by where Trump does not bear false witness against someone. He got into the Whitehouse by bearing false witness against, first Obama and then Hillary Clinton and you people ate it up. You loved it and still do as he applies his talents against Biden! So who is the sinner when one person commits the sin and his fans relish in it?
Blade_Runner wrote:
Why? 3000 years ago God found favor with an adulterer and murderer, anointed him king, and this king became the greatest of the Hebrew kings. He founded the kingdom of Israel and Judah.
Why? Because we have a president who boasted of his sexual conquests prior to being elected--most of which occurred while he was married. When asked if he had ever asked forgiveness for any of his actions he claimed that he had never done anything that he thought was wrong. So not only was he an adulterer but he was an unrepentant one making him one of the worst of all sinners--that's what you have against gays isn't it, that they haven't repented--yet you people had absolutely no problem voting for him.
So since adultery doesn't seem to matter anymore it should be taken off and replaced with something that does, say homosexuality. Would that be a good trade, adultery for homosexuality?
PeterS wrote:
Why? Because we have a president who boasted of his sexual conquests prior to being elected--most of which occurred while he was married. When asked if he had ever asked forgiveness for any of his actions he claimed that he had never done anything that he thought was wrong. So not only was he an adulterer but he was an unrepentant one making him one of the worst of all sinners--that's what you have against gays isn't it, that they haven't repented--yet you people had absolutely no problem voting for him.
So since adultery doesn't seem to matter anymore it should be taken off and replaced with something that does, say homosexuality. Would that be a good trade, adultery for homosexuality?
Why? Because we have a president who boasted of hi... (
show quote)
"VII - You shall not commit homosexuality"....Sure! That works perfectly!!
PeterS wrote:
Why? Because we have a president who boasted of his sexual conquests prior to being elected--most of which occurred while he was married. When asked if he had ever asked forgiveness for any of his actions he claimed that he had never done anything that he thought was wrong. So not only was he an adulterer but he was an unrepentant one making him one of the worst of all sinners--that's what you have against gays isn't it, that they haven't repented--yet you people had absolutely no problem voting for him.
So since adultery doesn't seem to matter anymore it should be taken off and replaced with something that does, say homosexuality. Would that be a good trade, adultery for homosexuality?
Why? Because we have a president who boasted of hi... (
show quote)
The king I mentioned had at least 7 wives as well as multiple concubines. Limited polygamy was allowed then and some of his wives shared his bed.
Among his wives, this king sired 19 sons and 1 daughter, he may have fathered children with his mistresses that have not been accounted for.
This king had the husband of the woman he wanted murdered, he then married her and fathered 4 sons.
About 900 years after this king died, his descendant was born in Bethlehem.
You don't believe in God or Jesus Christ, so all your phony moralizing over president Trump's behavior is meaningless and sickening.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.