bahmer

This is from Radiance3

Currently, I think there is no federal law that requires states consistency or uniformity in voting protocol.

The only way to fix this and make it consistent is for Congress to legislate a uniform voting guidelines for all states.

Therefore, California and New York could impose a voting policy for their registered voters. This will result to a series of litigation, based on voter’s fraud, in counting, and sometimes fraud in various ways.

At present most common guidelines are voting by in person, or voting by absentee ballot for those eligible, and for the military personnel out of states.

At present more states are crumbling to vote by mail in ballot. Therefor California and or New York can require protocol of voting by mail in ballot. This method may result to series of litigation especially at present when the socialist democrats are desperate to take over the US presidency. For mail in voting the ballot is mailed in automatically to every eligible voter.

Following are disadvantages of voting by mail.
There are disadvantages and advantages to voting by mail in ballot and we must have to weigh in which is the most ethical, honest, and compliant.

Disadvantages of mail in voting.
1.More cost involved. The creation of machines to count this new ballot system, more postage and printing costs are involved.
2. Independence: The voter may be coerced by someone at home and vote for the party or candidate not originally chosen by the voter.
3. Slower result since the ballot may sometimes arrive at a later date.
4. Increase in voter’s error. Compared to in person voting when the Voting Clerk could help correct the problems.
5. Desperate effects on some population. Some native Americans may not have permanent mailing address.
6. The in person voting tradition is broken and when a new procedure is made. Inconsistency create panic for some.
7. Increase in litigation the most significant counting disputes in the past was counting of absentee or mail in ballots.
8. Some democrat or liberal states could cheat by not counting votes for states that lean more of republican voters.
Advantages;
1. Convenience.
2. Voter turnout may increase.
3. Cost, no need to hire poll clerk in the voting booth.

I am afraid we will have a very long and litigious presidential election this Nov. 2020, when the socialist-communist democrats are desperate to take over the White House. They'll do all fraudulent means to win. Please be vigilant my fellow Americans. Make sure that the number of ballots counted must not be more than the registered voters.

May God help us!

Liberty Tree

Democrats plan to cheat and to win in Novemver by any means possible

bahmer

Amen and Amen

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Like NC ?

Hug

Mail in voting is pure fraud.

F.D.R.

[quote=bahmer]This is from Radiance3

Currently, I think there is no federal law that requires states consistency or uniformity in voting protocol.

The only way to fix this and make it consistent is for Congress to legislate a uniform voting guidelines for all states.

Therefore, California and New York could impose a voting policy for their registered voters. This will result to a series of litigation, based on voter’s fraud, in counting, and sometimes fraud in various ways.

At present most common guidelines are voting by in person, or voting by absentee ballot for those eligible, and for the military personnel out of states.

At present more states are crumbling to vote by mail in ballot. Therefor California and or New York can require protocol of voting by mail in ballot. This method may result to series of litigation especially at present when the socialist democrats are desperate to take over the US presidency. For mail in voting the ballot is mailed in automatically to every eligible voter.

Following are disadvantages of voting by mail.
There are disadvantages and advantages to voting by mail in ballot and we must have to weigh in which is the most ethical, honest, and compliant.

Disadvantages of mail in voting.
1.More cost involved. The creation of machines to count this new ballot system, more postage and printing costs are involved.
2. Independence: The voter may be coerced by someone at home and vote for the party or candidate not originally chosen by the voter.
3. Slower result since the ballot may sometimes arrive at a later date.
4. Increase in voter’s error. Compared to in person voting when the Voting Clerk could help correct the problems.
5. Desperate effects on some population. Some native Americans may not have permanent mailing address.
6. The in person voting tradition is broken and when a new procedure is made. Inconsistency create panic for some.
7. Increase in litigation the most significant counting disputes in the past was counting of absentee or mail in ballots.
8. Some democrat or liberal states could cheat by not counting votes for states that lean more of republican voters.
Advantages;
1. Convenience.
2. Voter turnout may increase.
3. Cost, no need to hire poll clerk in the voting booth.

I am afraid we will have a very long and litigious presidential election this Nov. 2020, when the socialist-communist democrats are desperate to take over the White House. They'll do all fraudulent means to win. Please be vigilant my fellow Americans. Make sure that the number of ballots counted must not be more than the registered voters.

May God help us![/quot

I'm surprised that the ACLU isn't all over this as 'DISCRIMINATORY'. After all if requiring an ID to vote discriminates against 'poor people' what about having to go and buy stamps? And what about handicap people having to get to a mailbox and will there be braille ballots?

I can see where those 'friendly' Democrats will mobilize to help these poor folks fill in their ballots and then deliver them. And whose to know how many mail in ballots are 'misplaced' by those on the receiving end?

dougolfw

I like the convenience of it. I like that it could increase voter turnout.
I don't like that voter registration rolls are sadly out of date.
I don't like that my voting will be handled by multiple people before being counted.
And I really don't like the prospect of vote harvesting.
All these open the door for addition fraud

bahmer

[quote=F.D.R.][quote=bahmer]This is from Radiance3

Currently, I think there is no federal law that requires states consistency or uniformity in voting protocol.

The only way to fix this and make it consistent is for Congress to legislate a uniform voting guidelines for all states.

Therefore, California and New York could impose a voting policy for their registered voters. This will result to a series of litigation, based on voter’s fraud, in counting, and sometimes fraud in various ways.

At present most common guidelines are voting by in person, or voting by absentee ballot for those eligible, and for the military personnel out of states.

At present more states are crumbling to vote by mail in ballot. Therefor California and or New York can require protocol of voting by mail in ballot. This method may result to series of litigation especially at present when the socialist democrats are desperate to take over the US presidency. For mail in voting the ballot is mailed in automatically to every eligible voter.

Following are disadvantages of voting by mail.
There are disadvantages and advantages to voting by mail in ballot and we must have to weigh in which is the most ethical, honest, and compliant.

Disadvantages of mail in voting.
1.More cost involved. The creation of machines to count this new ballot system, more postage and printing costs are involved.
2. Independence: The voter may be coerced by someone at home and vote for the party or candidate not originally chosen by the voter.
3. Slower result since the ballot may sometimes arrive at a later date.
4. Increase in voter’s error. Compared to in person voting when the Voting Clerk could help correct the problems.
5. Desperate effects on some population. Some native Americans may not have permanent mailing address.
6. The in person voting tradition is broken and when a new procedure is made. Inconsistency create panic for some.
7. Increase in litigation the most significant counting disputes in the past was counting of absentee or mail in ballots.
8. Some democrat or liberal states could cheat by not counting votes for states that lean more of republican voters.
Advantages;
1. Convenience.
2. Voter turnout may increase.
3. Cost, no need to hire poll clerk in the voting booth.

I am afraid we will have a very long and litigious presidential election this Nov. 2020, when the socialist-communist democrats are desperate to take over the White House. They'll do all fraudulent means to win. Please be vigilant my fellow Americans. Make sure that the number of ballots counted must not be more than the registered voters.

May God help us![/quot

I'm surprised that the ACLU isn't all over this as 'DISCRIMINATORY'. After all if requiring an ID to vote discriminates against 'poor people' what about having to go and buy stamps? And what about handicap people having to get to a mailbox and will there be braille ballots?

I can see where those 'friendly' Democrats will mobilize to help these poor folks fill in their ballots and then deliver them. And whose to know how many mail in ballots are 'misplaced' by those on the receiving end?[/quote]

Amen and Amen

Wolf counselor Loc: Heart of Texas

We just need civil war.....period.

Lonewolf

When America votes they vote democrat

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

Ya lost last time.

Liberty Tree

Like California. NC did the one election over and Democrat lost by more than he did the first time. California Democrats cheated in multiple elections by legalized Democrat voter harvesting cheating.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

Absentee voting is done by mail and has been forever. There's at least one State that has had mail in balloting forever. Ballots will only be mailed to persons with current status on voter rolls, using the address on record. Ballots must be accompanied by a copy of valid ID and current proof of residency and must match the voter record.

Yes it will take more time, but with volunteers, who would normally man polling stations, processing ballots, the cost isn't significant. Instead of party monitors stationed at dozens of polling sites, they'd only need to man one site. There will be no need for expensive recounts, which have happened repeatedly, because the initial count will have been verified by multiple persons, including party monitors. That savings alone will pay for the mail in balloting expenses.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

They must be smarter than NC.

American Vet

Between 2012 and 2018, 28.3 million mail-in ballots remain unaccounted for, according to data from the federal Election Assistance Commission. The missing ballots amount to nearly one in five of all absentee ballots and ballots mailed to voters residing in states that do elections exclusively by mail.

States and local authorities simply have no idea what happened to these ballots since they were mailed – and the figure of 28 million missing ballots is likely even higher because some areas in the country, notably Chicago, did not respond to the federal agency’s survey questions. This figure does not include ballots that were spoiled, undeliverable, or came back for any reason.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/04/24/28_million_mail-in_ballots_went_missing_in_last_four_elections_143033.html