archie bunker wrote:
Did he call you "Punk"?
That was funny s**t back then!!😂😂
Nope , but he kept calling me sir for a while until I told him I was she!
proud republican wrote:
Nope , but he kept calling me sir for a while until I told him I was she!
He meant no disrespect I'm sure. At least you're not a "Punk"!
archie bunker wrote:
He meant no disrespect I'm sure. At least you're not a "Punk"!
I know that Archie!! He stood up for me more than I care to remember !!! Where is he BTW ???
proud republican wrote:
I know that Archie!! He stood up for me more than I care to remember !!! Where is he BTW ???
He's on vacation with his wife in God's country. West Texas!
archie bunker wrote:
He's on vacation with his wife in God's country. West Texas!
Good for him!! Do you ever communicate with him? If yes,say hello from me,please!
archie bunker wrote:
I think I'll just go to Wal-Mart in my pajamas.......
I don't understand the world I live in anymore.
I wasn't even aware of the fault line accomplishments.
You won't be the first....find out when Walmart is having a pajama party, then you'll be part of the new normal. LOL.
I do have hopes of meeting you one day. Retirement is coming up in a couple of years and I've promised myself a major road trip out west. Palo Duro Canyon is on the list. As is Shiner with nachos. No imported beer for me, thanks, as long as there's good local.
working class stiff wrote:
You won't be the first....find out when Walmart is having a pajama party, then you'll be part of the new normal. LOL.
I do have hopes of meeting you one day. Retirement is coming up in a couple of years and I've promised myself a major road trip out west. Palo Duro Canyon is on the list. As is Shiner with nachos. No imported beer for me, thanks, as long as there's good local.
Ah, the canyon! Beautiful place! I haven't been there in a few years, but spent my life roaming it. Both public, and private areas. Both of my kids live in what is the Northern beginnings of it.
It's funny, you're driving on flat ground, then hit something like a 7% grade going downhill into the area where they live.
It's rough, rocky, craggy, with a live creek, and wildlife galore.
And we can definitely do Shiner!!
You seem to be a misguided individual. I’ll pray for you.
John Meoff wrote:
That's perfect. A never Trumper who admits his hatred. The Never-Trumpers are riddled with hate and hate leads to The Killing Fields, Auschwitz and GULAG. It is people like you who are the awful dangerous excuses for a human beings.
deb maybe short for debbie, I think she's a girl. Probably dropped on her head when she was a child. Poor thing. Wow didn't realize it went that far.
no propaganda please wrote:
I will bet it would even work to kill a couple of coyotes that are trying very hard to get the new kids that the neighbors goats have had in the last week. If not we will have to get the guns out again. The problem with using guns is that they are noisy and the coyotes , after they hear the first few shots, move elsewhere for a week or so, so all we get are the first two of the pride, not the other 7. Hit them with the shovel and the others are not alerted and tomorrow night we can get a couple more.
I will bet it would even work to kill a couple of ... (
show quote)
You need to apply for suppressors. Not TV quiet but may not scare away the pride allowing you to get most of them. .556 does a number on cotes. Mike
JW wrote:
https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2019-08-07/what-role-does-ideology-play-in-mass-shootings
Thanks. My interpretation of this latimes article is:
(1) Many (probably most, I'd now guess it's more than 80%) mass shootings are done for personal, not political, reasons. That was also said in at least one of the sources I had listed. This is something I didn't know when I had started. When I started I thought that a larger proportion of mass shootings in the last few years were more a kind of Trump-supporter-related phenomenon. So maybe it's a much smaller proportion of them.
(2) It does (very likely) sometimes happen for political reasons on both sides of the political spectrum (not saying it's evenly divided though); one of the examples did have at least one emphatic indicator that a socialist did a mass shooting and claimed some socialism-related reason (though, _even_then_, it may not have been the main underlying reason for that mass shooting).
(3) Some mass shootings appear inspired by, or in agreement with, Trump's public rhetoric; though that still may not be the main reasons for those mass shootings.
And:
(4) Among prominently visible politicians (e.g., Sanders, Warren, Trump), Trump displays rhetoric the more likely (probably by far the most likely) to inspire wrongful violence.
One could make the (rather weak) argument that rhetoric should never be blamed for anything, or that spiteful or degrading words (such as some of Trump's) should never be blamed for anything.
One could also make the similarly weak argument that there is _no_ cause-and-effect relationship anywhere.
deb999 wrote:
Hi everyone I'm glad to be here. How many Never Trumpers do we have? Why do you classify yourself as a Never Trumper? Is it his ignorance, his malignant narcissism, his total disdain for the law or his disregard for the Constitution? Perhaps you have different reasons, if so please share them. I'm always looking for fresh kindling to fuel the burning fire of hatred I feel for this awful dangerous excuse for a human being!
Welcome, I hope you are more intelligent than our native OPP Never Trumpers. I look forward to your future posts.
son of witless wrote:
Welcome, I hope you are more intelligent than our native OPP Never Trumpers. I look forward to your future posts.
We may have reached a new low with this one.
JohnCorrespondent wrote:
Thanks. My interpretation of this latimes article is:
(1) Many (probably most, I'd now guess it's more than 80%) mass shootings are done for personal, not political, reasons. That was also said in at least one of the sources I had listed. This is something I didn't know when I had started. When I started I thought that a larger proportion of mass shootings in the last few years were more a kind of Trump-supporter-related phenomenon. So maybe it's a much smaller proportion of them.
(2) It does (very likely) sometimes happen for political reasons on both sides of the political spectrum (not saying it's evenly divided though); one of the examples did have at least one emphatic indicator that a socialist did a mass shooting and claimed some socialism-related reason (though, _even_then_, it may not have been the main underlying reason for that mass shooting).
(3) Some mass shootings appear inspired by, or in agreement with, Trump's public rhetoric; though that still may not be the main reasons for those mass shootings.
And:
(4) Among prominently visible politicians (e.g., Sanders, Warren, Trump), Trump displays rhetoric the more likely (probably by far the most likely) to inspire wrongful violence.
One could make the (rather weak) argument that rhetoric should never be blamed for anything, or that spiteful or degrading words (such as some of Trump's) should never be blamed for anything.
One could also make the similarly weak argument that there is _no_ cause-and-effect relationship anywhere.
Thanks. My interpretation of this latimes article... (
show quote)
OR basically someone gets bent out of shape and wants to kill someone but in the end dosen't want to take responsibility for their actions and brings up whatever is available.
bilordinary wrote:
We may have reached a new low with this one.
Please do not scare him away.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.