One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Hate speech and the Left...
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Feb 5, 2020 22:17:58   #
jeff smith
 
PeterS wrote:
Hypocrisy? Yeah, we are really vile...


I didn't care for hawkings and I sure didn't like or trust obumer . but I do not like or agree with the --/-/-// idiots in those pictures . that IS racist and no need for such crap in this day and age .

Reply
Feb 6, 2020 01:18:36   #
JW
 
PeterS wrote:
Hypocrisy? Yeah, we are really vile...


I don't think you caught the essence of my posting. It was about hatred being directed at anyone who disagrees with you. You are the people making such a commotion about not inciting hatred, I am just curious as to why you seem so eager to escalate the level of hatred. You claim to be opposed to it yet you never miss an opportunity to promote it.

Reply
Feb 6, 2020 01:28:25   #
JW
 
Kevyn wrote:
Criticism of an individual even vulgar criticism is not hate speech unless the speech specifically mentions race, color, creed, sex or sexual orientation. As an example Trump is of German ancestry, calling him a stupid Kraut, which is the only derogatory term I can think of for for Germans could be considered hate speech however calling him a Cheeto faced Shitgibbon is simply a colorful insult. Even calling him a Nazi is not hate speech because it refers to political tendencies. Thief, con man, compulsive liar and traitor are all of course harsh but well reasoned descriptions of his behavior and adapt descriptions. Their is an interesting legal term called “fighting words” that do not rise to the level of hate speech but to an average person could reasonably provoke a violent response. As an example referring to a persons mother as a whore in the presence of both can be used as a defense in the assault of the person making the insult, but it is by no means a universal defense as many other factors come into play.
Criticism of an individual even vulgar criticism i... (show quote)


Hate is hate, Kevy. Your anticipated attempt to bifurcate it is the signal essence of hypocrisy.

Reply
 
 
Feb 6, 2020 01:31:30   #
JW
 
lpnmajor wrote:
It's the same everywhere and crosses all economic, political and ideological boundaries. It's human nature - "when I do it, it's ok, when YOU do it, it's vile and disgusting".


It is vile and disgusting no matter who does it. It is even vile and disgusting if I do it which is why you will not see such hatred in my writings.

I did slip once and call someone here a moron but I felt justified since the posting I was responding to did reflect a clinical IQ somewhere around a large shoe size. Still, that would reflect disdain more than hatred but I was warned and won't repeat that infraction.

Reply
Feb 6, 2020 01:41:43   #
JW
 
Kevyn wrote:
They do constantly, what do you call the whining about athletes kneeling for the National anthem or the prudes pissing and moaning that the super bowl halftime show was too risqué? How about the gag orders on doctors even informing women of abortion options? All are withering examples of attacks on speech and expression.


No, not exactly, unless it is your position that a society has no right to a general comfort level in interpersonal actions/relations. If that is what you are proposing, what right do you have to any level of social comfort?

To deliberately provoke a segment of society by trashing their values does not fall under protected speech. It is a form of assault.

As for Doctors informing women of all of their health options, I am familiar with no limitations placed on doctors other than by their own consciences.

Reply
Feb 6, 2020 01:45:17   #
JW
 
jeff smith wrote:
no . it's only hate speech if a conservative makes a comment or says an opinion that isn't liked by a liberal . libs. can say and do anything they want and it isn't considered hate speech . it is their opinion . just more liberal HYPOCRACY .


That is pretty much how I see it too...

Reply
Feb 6, 2020 03:21:59   #
Hemiman Loc: Communist California
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Whining? You don't understand what the anthem means to many vets. Here's an example. One lost both legs yet he stood for the anthem. It isn't just the refusing to stand for the anthem, I simply have been boycotting NFL games for going on 5 years now, you'd be surprised at how easy it is to find replacements. The other issue is the players playing the victim card. You and I know very well they never picked cotton, I nor you ever had slaves so their point is? The super bowl halftime show, I can't comment, haven't seen it. I've been working with a pro-life leader (Students For Life) so I guess our attitudes on that will be very different.
Whining? You don't understand what the anthem mean... (show quote)


The weasel couldn’t care less,he sucks this country dry and then does nothing for it.

Reply
 
 
Feb 6, 2020 06:14:32   #
American Vet
 
JW wrote:
To deliberately provoke a segment of society by trashing their values does not fall under protected speech. It is a form of assault.
.


That's an artificial construct - and is an assault of free speech.

Reply
Feb 6, 2020 06:17:40   #
American Vet
 
JW wrote:

As for Doctors informing women of all of their health options, I am familiar with no limitations placed on doctors other than by their own consciences.


Clinics that take federal Title X family planning funding are adjusting to a new set of rules that limit what health care providers can say to their patients about abortion.

Though Planned Parenthood pulled out of the program in August rather than comply with the rules, thousands of other clinics continue to use grants from the federal program for family planning and sexual health services. These clinics are now under pressure to make sure their staff comply.

Planned Parenthood Withdraws From Title X Program Over Trump Abortion Rule
The new regulations prohibit doctors in Title X-funded primary care clinics from referring pregnant patients for abortions, and also state that health care providers cannot "perform, promote, or support abortion as a method of family planning."

Though the Department of Health and Human Services issued guidance that the regulations are not a "gag rule" and that doctors are still allowed to provide information about abortion, organizations that represent physicians are concerned that the ambiguity of the language in the rules will leave some doctors forgoing conversations about abortion entirely.

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/09/09/756103421/doctors-say-federal-rules-on-discussing-abortions-inhibit-relationships-with-pat

Reply
Feb 6, 2020 18:00:00   #
JW
 
American Vet wrote:
That's an artificial construct - and is an assault of free speech.


So, tell me what in the realm of human civilization is not an artificial construct - and deliberate antagonism reduces the concept of free speech to "I can say anything I want cuz my daddy is bigger than your daddy." If that is your point of view, you best get the cosmoline off of your AR 15 cuz you're gonna need it.

Reply
Feb 6, 2020 18:05:18   #
American Vet
 
JW wrote:
So, tell me what in the realm of human civilization is not an artificial construct - and deliberate antagonism reduces the concept of free speech to "I can say anything I want cuz my daddy is bigger than your daddy." If that is your point of view, you best get the cosmoline off of your AR 15 cuz you're gonna need it.


Your comment about 'provoking'...I have heard of people being 'provoked' to violence by a red hat with words they didn't like.

You don't like what you hear? Ignore it.

Respecting free speech is paramount to freedom.

Reply
 
 
Feb 6, 2020 18:05:46   #
woodguru
 
JFlorio wrote:
Not just our President. They hate anyone that disagrees with them.


You do realize that your president consistently attacks everyone and everything that disagrees with him...right? You sound severely ignorant when you accuse the other side of exactly what it is trump does in spades. Every time he opens his mouth it is to attack someone or something that disagrees with him.

Reply
Feb 6, 2020 18:25:34   #
American Vet
 
woodguru wrote:
You do realize that your president consistently attacks everyone and everything that disagrees with him...right? You sound severely ignorant when you accuse the other side of exactly what it is trump does in spades. Every time he opens his mouth it is to attack someone or something that disagrees with him.


Yep, he's a fighter. For too long the Republicans have been too nice, thinking that if they are nice, the liberals will also be nice - never happened.

President Trump is a New York brawler...like I said, his election was, in essence, a revolution. Perhaps a new type of Republican who will dish ir right back to liberals.

Reply
Feb 6, 2020 19:01:35   #
JW
 
American Vet wrote:
Your comment about 'provoking'...I have heard of people being 'provoked' to violence by a red hat with words they didn't like.

You don't like what you hear? Ignore it.

Respecting free speech is paramount to freedom.


Important, yes, paramount, no. Paramount to freedom is respecting your fellow citizens. Deliberate provocation conveys the greatest possible disrespect. There is a world of difference between carrying a sign and spitting in someone's face.

Reply
Feb 6, 2020 23:02:23   #
JW
 
American Vet wrote:
Clinics that take federal Title X family planning funding are adjusting to a new set of rules that limit what health care providers can say to their patients about abortion.

Though Planned Parenthood pulled out of the program in August rather than comply with the rules, thousands of other clinics continue to use grants from the federal program for family planning and sexual health services. These clinics are now under pressure to make sure their staff comply.

Planned Parenthood Withdraws From Title X Program Over Trump Abortion Rule
The new regulations prohibit doctors in Title X-funded primary care clinics from referring pregnant patients for abortions, and also state that health care providers cannot "perform, promote, or support abortion as a method of family planning."

Though the Department of Health and Human Services issued guidance that the regulations are not a "gag rule" and that doctors are still allowed to provide information about abortion, organizations that represent physicians are concerned that the ambiguity of the language in the rules will leave some doctors forgoing conversations about abortion entirely.

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/09/09/756103421/doctors-say-federal-rules-on-discussing-abortions-inhibit-relationships-with-pat
Clinics that take federal Title X family planning ... (show quote)




The bottom line is always that he who pays the Piper calls the toon. Don't take government money and say whatever you like about abortion. There are no limits on what is relayed on the subject other than those chosen by the doctor.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.