H**e speech and the Left.. For several years, the Left has decried the use of what they have defined as 'h**e speech'. Bravo! There is enough hatred in this world. We don't need more.

JW

For several years, the Left has decried the use of what they have defined as 'h**e speech'. Bravo! There is enough hatred in this world. We don't need more.

The thing is, they apparently have no problem directing the most vile and vulgar expressions of hatred toward our President. More L*****t hypocrisy or is it just h**e speech if a favored group or person is targeted?

Just Wondering

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Not just our President. They h**e anyone that disagrees with them.

JW wrote:

For several years, the Left has decried the use of what they have defined as 'h**e speech'. Bravo! There is enough hatred in this world. We don't need more.

The thing is, they apparently have no problem directing the most vile and vulgar expressions of hatred toward our President. More L*****t hypocrisy or is it just h**e speech if a favored group or person is targeted?

Just Wondering

JW

JFlorio wrote:

Not just our President. They h**e anyone that disagrees with them.

Sure does seem that way...

elledee

everything is what they say it is .....right or wrong be damned. like bratty kids..... I just want my way

roy

elledee wrote:

everything is what they say it is .....right or wrong be damned. like bratty kids..... I just want my way

Look in the mirror

PeterS

JW wrote:

For several years, the Left has decried the use of what they have defined as 'h**e speech'. Bravo! There is enough hatred in this world. We don't need more.

The thing is, they apparently have no problem directing the most vile and vulgar expressions of hatred toward our President. More L*****t hypocrisy or is it just h**e speech if a favored group or person is targeted?

Just Wondering

Hypocrisy? Yeah, we are really vile...

Tug484

JW wrote:

For several years, the Left has decried the use of what they have defined as 'h**e speech'. Bravo! There is enough hatred in this world. We don't need more.

The thing is, they apparently have no problem directing the most vile and vulgar expressions of hatred toward our President. More L*****t hypocrisy or is it just h**e speech if a favored group or person is targeted?

Just Wondering

So true.

American Vet

PeterS wrote:

Hypocrisy? Yeah, we are really vile...

The very few diatribes directed at obama come no where near the level the l*****t have directed at President Trump - and on a daily basis.

There are always fringe elements in every group. The difference is directing hatred at the President is not 'fringe' in the democrat party - it is central to their existence.

Kevyn

JW wrote:

For several years, the Left has decried the use of what they have defined as 'h**e speech'. Bravo! There is enough hatred in this world. We don't need more.

The thing is, they apparently have no problem directing the most vile and vulgar expressions of hatred toward our President. More L*****t hypocrisy or is it just h**e speech if a favored group or person is targeted?

Just Wondering

Criticism of an individual even vulgar criticism is not h**e speech unless the speech specifically mentions race, color, creed, sex or sexual orientation. As an example Trump is of German ancestry, calling him a stupid Kraut, which is the only derogatory term I can think of for for Germans could be considered h**e speech however calling him a Cheeto faced S**tgibbon is simply a colorful insult. Even calling him a N**i is not h**e speech because it refers to political tendencies. Thief, con man, compulsive liar and t*****r are all of course harsh but well reasoned descriptions of his behavior and adapt descriptions. Their is an interesting legal term called “fighting words” that do not rise to the level of h**e speech but to an average person could reasonably provoke a violent response. As an example referring to a persons mother as a whore in the presence of both can be used as a defense in the assault of the person making the insult, but it is by no means a universal defense as many other factors come into play.

Hemiman Loc: Communist California

PeterS wrote:

Hypocrisy? Yeah, we are really vile...

Photos taken by Democrats so Republicans will be blamed.

Hemiman Loc: Communist California

Kevyn wrote:

Criticism of an individual even vulgar criticism i... (show quote)

You think you can get away with this name calling The President,you better hope administration of the site agrees.

lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas

JW wrote:

For several years, the Left has decried the use of what they have defined as 'h**e speech'. Bravo! There is enough hatred in this world. We don't need more.

The thing is, they apparently have no problem directing the most vile and vulgar expressions of hatred toward our President. More L*****t hypocrisy or is it just h**e speech if a favored group or person is targeted?

Just Wondering

It's the same everywhere and crosses all economic, political and ideological boundaries. It's human nature - "when I do it, it's ok, when YOU do it, it's vile and d********g".

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

lpnmajor wrote:

It's the same everywhere and crosses all economic, political and ideological boundaries. It's human nature - "when I do it, it's ok, when YOU do it, it's vile and d********g".

You may be right but I can’t find a recent example of conservatives trying to shut down speech.

Kevyn

JFlorio wrote:

You may be right but I can’t find a recent example of conservatives trying to shut down speech.

They do constantly, what do you call the whining about athletes kneeling for the National anthem or the prudes pissing and moaning that the super bowl halftime show was too risqué? How about the gag orders on doctors even informing women of a******n options? All are withering examples of attacks on speech and expression.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Kevyn wrote:

They do constantly, what do you call the whining about athletes kneeling for the National anthem or the prudes pissing and moaning that the super bowl halftime show was too risqué? How about the gag orders on doctors even informing women of a******n options? All are withering examples of attacks on speech and expression.

that's free speech fool. Not trying to shut down speech. You are an unhinged miserable little troll but I guess it pays better than sponging of mommy.