Something besides NYT please. I won't pay to read their garbage!
Ohhhh so its ok for Biden to defy the order but for anyone else its a cover up!!! Alrighty thennnm, got it..
lindajoy wrote:
Ohhhh so its ok for Biden to defy the order but for anyone else its a cover up!!! Alrighty thennnm, got it..
It seems to me that EVERY American has the right to appeal to the courts, the third co-equal branch
of our Government, to provide guidance, when in doubt.
Gatsby wrote:
It seems to me that EVERY American has the right to appeal to the courts, the third co-equal branch
of our Government, to provide guidance, when in doubt.
Not the courts for direction but by their attorney or themself through motions to the court(s) all the way the SCOTUS if needed. Courts can not guide you,they can only rule on what is submitted relative to the law..
Old news, he walked that idea back after a couple of days
I can’t imagine what difference it would make. He’d just continue with his lies and accusations. He’s a real rotter.
This is not a simple yes or no. If he is called, he can not ignore the Senate. Should he ignore the Senate, they can have him arrested and brought to the Senate, fined, and jailed. However, he can appear without providing testimony if he can plead the 5th. But, that is conditional. The truthful response would need to be proven (if challenged) incriminating of a breach of law and he could be charged with a crime. His alternative, he can ask Chief Justice to be questioned in a secure area if his testimony contains information that is classified.
Pleading the 5th has assumed perceptions that are unintended, a mindset that there is wrong doing, which is not the intent of the clause. This unintended assumption would damage his reputation and would give fuel for liberals for when he loses the election to President Trump. If allowed to be questioned in sequestered setting, the public will assume some underhanded deals. Again, this would be weaponized by liberals.
If I were a lawyer for the POTUS, I would not have him subpoenaed to testify.
Thank you sir/madam/thing!
nwtk2007 wrote:
Thank you sir/madam/thing!
You're welcome sir/madam/thing!
No more than it is trump's right to claim an executive privilege on things way outside of what is covered by executive privilege.
woodguru wrote:
No more than it is trump's right to claim an executive privilege on things way outside of what is covered by executive privilege.
You mean like running guns to Mexico? Using the IRS to target conservative groups tax status? LOL!
nwtk2007 wrote:
You mean like running guns to Mexico? Using the IRS to target conservative groups tax status? LOL!
No, of course not. LOL LOL 👍😂
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.