Biden vows to defy Senate Subpoena, is that his "right"? (Page 3): Everybody knows there is nothing there. Barr controls everything and yet, trump did not order him to get Biden. Rudy...

moldyoldy

nwtk2007 wrote:

Oh, well we know he can trust them! LOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No, he has asked Ukraine to look into it. He has Giuliani who now has evidence. He has statements by Ukraine officials. And yes, he even has Durham and Barr doing their part. But as for the FBI/CIA, there is nothing stopping them from investigating and I would bet that they have/are.

Everybody knows there is nothing there. Barr controls everything and yet, trump did not order him to get Biden. Rudy, like sheriff Joe will make fantastic claims and never produce anything. They learned to lie like trump.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

moldyoldy wrote:

Everybody knows there is nothing there. Barr controls everything and yet, trump did not order him to get Biden. Rudy, like sheriff Joe will make fantastic claims and never produce anything. They learned to lie like trump.

Everybody? Uh, no.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

Gatsby wrote:

If Biden has such a right, does everyone have such a "right"?

What do you think?

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/27/us/politics/joe-biden-trump-trial.html

If he subpoenaed, he goes. No macho "I'm not complying." Well he can get a felony conviction instead.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

lindajoy wrote:

Ohhhh so its ok for Biden to defy the order but for anyone else its a cover up!!! Alrighty thennnm, got it..

No it's not okay, Biden has the cia, fbi, and Obammie holding "guns to his head" not literally. So you see why they don't want him to if they look in the metadata everything will flood out.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

moldyoldy wrote:

Biden is not a part of trump s impeachment. If trump really wanted an investigation of Biden, he could have ordered it.

He should have, there is a lot to it reaching Obammie. Like you said could have ordered it.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

nwtk2007 wrote:

Y'all keep saying that as if saying it removes him from the potential witness list. If it comes to witnesses, Biden will be called and if he shows he will be cut to pieces in front of national TV. If he refuses the whole thing grinds to a stop as this goes through the courts for who knows how long.

Once more go to the damn metadata! Why did H****r become an ensign at 42? to have a blackberry, everything was encrypted.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

nwtk2007 wrote:

Oh, well we know he can trust them! LOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No, he has asked Ukraine to look into it. He has Giuliani who now has evidence. He has statements by Ukraine officials. And yes, he even has Durham and Barr doing their part. But as for the FBI/CIA, there is nothing stopping them from investigating and I would bet that they have/are.

Don't count on them too much, it isn't that they don't want to, this is hidden better than Clinton's stuff.

Lt. Rob Polans ret.

nwtk2007 wrote:

Everybody? Uh, no.

He'll be surprised. Rudy did get into the metadata. In Brooklyn.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:

Once more go to the damn metadata! Why did H****r become an ensign at 42? to have a blackberry, everything was encrypted.

That's a pretty heavy accusation.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:

Don't count on them too much, it isn't that they don't want to, this is hidden better than Clinton's stuff.

Maybe not.

RRRoger

Biden should be put on the stand but will take the 5th against self incrimination instead.

roy

RRRoger wrote:

Biden should be put on the stand but will take the 5th against self incrimination instead.

And may he knows plenty on trump,but he just not a discussing human being to let it out unless he's pushed. But also if Biden did something dishonest while he's been an elected official then please hang him. My hope tho is that if they call Biden and his son that they will also call trumps sons,

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

woodguru wrote:

No more than it is trump's right to claim an executive privilege on things way outside of what is covered by executive privilege.

It seems to me that you constantly run off at the mouth and state as fact things you don't know but rather imagine in your head. For example start naming all those things "way outside of what is covered by executive privilege" you state The President has no right to claim.