Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Oh...so that's what Joe Biden's son would have to have done, to knock up a naked dancer.

Mikeyavelli

You kommiecrats use them for your good lookin farm stock too?

Kevyn

Not even close, that is an entirely false narrative foisted by the forced motherhood industry.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

On Valentine's day too ?

waltmoreno

Rather, if you don’t want an abortion, don’t have unprotected sex. It’s easy enough to wear protection.
As for legalized abortion being the current law, that’s true but don’t count on it too much longer. One more Trump appointee to the SCOTUS will do the trick and I hear RBG isn’t doing too well these days.
Overruling Roe v Wade will require no more than recognizing that what was formerly described as mere tissue in in that opinion, is actually a human being with all the rights which we give to persons under our constitution. Science is on our side.
Kinda like previous SCOTUS decisions which over ruled an earlier precedent, the Dred Scott decision, about blacks, and held that they too were 100% persons under our constitutions and hence entitled to the full protection of the law,
There’s hardly anyone today who wouldn’t argue that that was the correct decision then. So it’s merely a matter of it becoming a part of our national fabric to concede the obvious, that what’s growing inside a pregnant woman’s body is another human being. We recognized the rights of blacks, at great costs I might add. Over 550,000 men.
Eventually, we’ll do the same for babies. The cost will have exceeded 55 million babies.

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

Forced motherhood? Really? Motherhood was once considered a blessing; folks like you have turned it into a blessing or a curse depending on a mother's choice. Mind you it does not require a father's choice. A wife can get an abortion without her husband's consent and you still cannot understand why actions your mob advocates destroys the sanctity of marriage.

The Jesus you reject, tells us about folks like yourself in the parable of the rich man and Lazarus (Lk 16:19–31), He taught us that even if evidence of the afterlife were to be revealed to us by bringing back someone from the dead to tell us about it, some people would still not believe.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

Precisely. The administration issued me a warning about insulting someone yet, these liberals, especially such as factnotfiction, PeterS, Kevyn, and some others are permitted to level their blasts, call us names and the administration does nothing.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

As usual, Kevyn resorts to his clichés. Forced motherhood. Answer THIS Kevyn, which you won't. Who forced the mother to have sex? If anyone did, it was by definition rape, which probably accounts for less than 0.5%of pregnancies.

Weasel your way out of confronting this, any of you pro-'choicers.'

Anything to avoid reality. You remind me of Adolf Eichmann; I only followed orders.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

You speak the truth.

Mikeyavelli

On valentine's day the kommiecrats don't use condoms while they are with their favorite chicken.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

[quote=waltmoreno]Rather, if you don’t want an abortion, don’t have unprotected sex. It’s easy enough to wear protection.
As for legalized abortion being the current law, that’s true but don’t count on it too much longer. One more Trump appointee to the SCOTUS will do the trick and I hear RBG isn’t doing too well these days.
Overruling Roe v Wade will require no more than recognizing that what was formerly described as mere tissue in in that opinion, is actually a human being with all the rights which we give to persons under our constitution. Science is on our side.
Kinda like previous SCOTUS decisions which over ruled an earlier precedent, the Dred Scott decision, about blacks, and held that they too were 100% persons under our constitutions and hence entitled to the full protection of the law,
There’s hardly anyone today who wouldn’t argue that that was the correct decision then. So it’s merely a matter of it becoming a part of our national fabric to concede the obvious, that what’s growing inside a pregnant woman’s body is another human being. We recognized the rights of blacks, at great costs I might add. Over 550,000 men.
Eventually, we’ll do the same for babies. The cost will have exceeded 55 million babies.[/quote


That's the way these liberals are. He doesn't care about morality and science. Factnotfiction only cares about imposing his idea of liberty on all, overlooking science. (And wasn't it the liberals who were supposed to be more scientifically oriented than us conservatives?) Of course, truth doesn't matter to people like him.

The Roe vs. Wade decision that he worhips so vehemently, was written by Harry Blackmun. Blackmun was Ricard Nixon's third choice for a Supreme Court seat after Clement Haynsworth and George Harrold Carswell had been rejected by the Democratic Senate.

The logic he employed in the decision was a very tenuous. It's worth reading by anyone. It appalled a Harvard law professor who favored legalizing of abortion.

It is based upon right that is nowhere mentioned in The Constitution as a right that the federal government would protect. Therefore any right to privacy should devolve to the states and the people. As an aside, The State of Rhode Island has never recognized a right to privacy.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Scrambling the eggs.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

When your date is Mary Palm, you don't need one.

federally indicted mattoid

How many Ukranians died after he withheld defense funds? Ditto in Syria after pulling us out?

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

Show a number, or you're just playing in Schitt.