Fact checking trumps bizarre rants, raves and lies: And this will make the usual trumpcon heads explode, tears to stream down their old, wrinkled faces, tell their lies, distortions...

factnotfiction

And this will make the usual trumpcon heads explode, tears to stream down their old, wrinkled faces, tell their lies, distortions and deflections in their sorrowful attempt to protect their trump.

They should be so embarrassed by this d********g stain on American politics, impeache after only 3 years in office.

What a sad historical fact that will last FOREVER

https://apnews.com/8b63593dda6377d54ce7e442821751cc

Liberty Tree

factnotfiction wrote:

And this will make the usual trumpcon heads explode, tears to stream down their old, wrinkled faces, tell their lies, distortions and deflections in their sorrowful attempt to protect their trump.

They should be so embarrassed by this d********g stain on American politics, impeache after only 3 years in office.

What a sad historical fact that will last FOREVER

https://apnews.com/8b63593dda6377d54ce7e442821751cc

No disgrace to be impeached by partisan h**emongers. Any group can abuse their power and do that. Democrats are the ones who disgraced themselves.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

factnotfiction wrote:

And this will make the usual trumpcon heads explode, tears to stream down their old, wrinkled faces, tell their lies, distortions and deflections in their sorrowful attempt to protect their trump.

They should be so embarrassed by this d********g stain on American politics, impeache after only 3 years in office.

What a sad historical fact that will last FOREVER

https://apnews.com/8b63593dda6377d54ce7e442821751cc

Heads explode.? How ridiculously Boring
fecklessfiction.😁

Trooper745 Loc: Carolina

factnotfiction wrote:

And this will make the usual trumpcon heads explode, tears to stream down their old, wrinkled faces, tell their lies, distortions and deflections in their sorrowful attempt to protect their trump.

They should be so embarrassed by this d********g stain on American politics, impeache after only 3 years in office.

What a sad historical fact that will last FOREVER

https://apnews.com/8b63593dda6377d54ce7e442821751cc

Everyone can agree that Trump isn't anywhere near perfect. He is just a thousand times better than the other candidates that ran in 2016.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

factnotfiction wrote:

And this will make the usual trumpcon heads explode, tears to stream down their old, wrinkled faces, tell their lies, distortions and deflections in their sorrowful attempt to protect their trump.

They should be so embarrassed by this d********g stain on American politics, impeache after only 3 years in office.

What a sad historical fact that will last FOREVER

https://apnews.com/8b63593dda6377d54ce7e442821751cc

What about this sad historical fact? Donald J. Trump did everything he could to save 4 million dead babies during his term, so far. His predecessor approved directly of the slaughter of about 10 million that died during his.

What do you think about that or is this another question on the subject that you'll prefer to avoid? And you claim to be pro-life. Try to sell that to anyone.

factnotfiction

crazylibertarian wrote:

What about this sad historical fact? Donald J. Tr... (show quote)

As usual you are wrong with your lies and assertion, and for the record, my stance is that it is a woman's and her doctors right to choose what is best for her, ergo I am in the pro choice column.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

factnotfiction wrote:

As usual you are wrong with your lies and assertion, and for the record, my stance is that it is a woman's and he doctors right to choose what is best for her, ergo I am in the pro choice column.

Of course it is. That's my point which makes you, IMHO, complicit in the destruction of millions of humn lives. What about the fetus' choice.

It's you who is wrong. Science is on MY side.

Trooper745 Loc: Carolina

factnotfiction wrote:

As usual you are wrong with your lies and assertion, and for the record, my stance is that it is a woman's and he doctors right to choose what is best for her, ergo I am in the pro choice column.

Perhaps we need to expand the baby murder laws to allow the father to demand that the baby be born and put into his care, and then have the doctor slaughter the mother immediately after the birth is complete.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

Trooper745 wrote:

Perhaps we need to expand the baby murder laws to allow the father to demand that the baby be born and put into his care, and then have the doctor slaughter the mother immediately after the birth is complete.

Good one.

I've had male patients who said they were outraged when they had no say in the a******n of their children.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

factnotfiction wrote:

As usual you are wrong with your lies and assertion, and for the record, my stance is that it is a woman's and he doctors right to choose what is best for her, ergo I am in the pro choice column.

So pro a******n.

factnotfiction

crazylibertarian wrote:

Of course it is. That's my point which makes you, IMHO, complicit in the destruction of millions of humn lives. What about the fetus' choice.

It's you who is wrong. Science is on MY side.

The law is on my side, and if you don't want an a******n, don't have one, but let other people make their own decision without the psychobabble of rightwingnutjobs, who always want to meddle in what doesn't concern them

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

factnotfiction wrote:

The law is on my side, and if you don't want an a******n, don't have one, but let other people make their own decision without the psychobabble of rightwingnutjobs, who always want to meddle in what doesn't concern them

Better rightwingnutjobs than leftwingscumballswhoendorsetheslaughterofinfants. How'd your mother feel about it?

padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al

factnotfiction wrote:

As usual you are wrong with your lies and assertion, and for the record, my stance is that it is a woman's and he doctors right to choose what is best for her, ergo I am in the pro choice column.

You can put Channel #5 all over dog droppings but all you've done is camouf**ge the odor.

You can claim you're pro choice but that also means you're pro k*****g unborn children because realistically that's the only other choice. So how did you reconcile your conscience to accept women have a "right" to k**l their children? Maybe someday they'll obtain a right to k**l their partners or their husbands. Maybe we'll evolve to a point where we can euthanize our children up to a certain age, say 8 or 10, because something's wrong with them or they're no longer wanted - maybe after a divorce? Let's not disregard the possibility of Doctors being given the authority to "mercy murder" the aged if they become a financial liability to Universal Health Care. Yes sir, pro-choice open the possibilities for a multitude of choices.

crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island

padremike wrote:

You can put Channel #5 all over dog droppings but ... (show quote)

isn't it funny but all these pro-choicers had mothers who made the choice to have them?

Trooper745 Loc: Carolina

factnotfiction wrote:

The law is on my side.......

And there is absolutely no one on the innocent baby's side!!!!!

A stupid law that denies the innocent child the God-given right to life!