One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Here's How The GOP Defines The Difference Between Fact And Unsubstantiated Rhetoric
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Nov 26, 2019 15:35:41   #
Kevyn
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Are you also one of those who thinks foreign policy isn't a prerogative of the president?? Ms Fiona and Mr Vindman both seem to think they dictate foreign policy and the president had better just shut up and go along. They are far from the truth.

http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-170508-1.html

The stated policy of Trumps own state department is to arm Ukraine to defend themselves against Russia. Trump set up a shadow group headed by Rudy and his Russian mob buddies to shake down Ukraine instead. If what he was doing is above board why not run it through the state department instead of his fixer and mobsters? Foreign policy is the president’s prerogative until it turns into extortion and bribery, Ben it is a crime.

Reply
Nov 26, 2019 15:40:38   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Airforceone wrote:
Here’s the republicans made simple.

Trump/ Republicans the Ukraine hacked our elections. Totally debunked

Now Trump tells his ignorant supporters pay attention to what I say and stop listening to the media.

All the media is doing is reporting the facts that got released from our intelligence Agencies.

But the ignorance on the right continues.


There is NO claim that the Ukraine "hacked" the DNC computers. And just food for thought, if the DNC had been running an above board honest campaign, then the release of the email would not have been so damning. the claim is that government officials of the Ukraine wrote and published in our own news untruthful and grievous lies about Mr Trump prior to his election.

Reply
Nov 26, 2019 15:42:49   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
Pennylynn wrote:
There is NO claim that the Ukraine "hacked" the DNC computers. And just food for thought, if the DNC had been running an above board honest campaign, then the release of the email would not have been so damning. the claim is that government officials of the Ukraine wrote and published in our own news untruthful and grievous lies about Mr Trump prior to his election.


If Drumph ran an above board business operation, then the release of his tax returns would not be so damning... Oops, I mean they will be.

Which is why he won't.

Reply
 
 
Nov 26, 2019 15:43:29   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Well, Ukraine is investigating it anyway. LOLOL! I am sure Manifort can corroborate some of it.

And, for the ten thousandth time, if some one claims to know where a hack originated by looking at the systems involved, then they don't actually know. Hackers can make hacks look like they came from your own back yard. LOL! Thus, we do NOT know Ukraine was not involved in hacking and we do NOT know Russia did the hacking. Last I heard, no source offered, there were 7 countries involved in hacking into our election, none of which involved changing votes or altering numbers.

Your facts that the GOP facts are no good is just good evidence that YOUR facts are no good.
Well, Ukraine is investigating it anyway. LOLOL! ... (show quote)


True.... plus, no one other than CrowdStrike EVER examined the servers before they disappeared.

Reply
Nov 26, 2019 15:45:11   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
If Drumph ran an above board business operation, then the release of his tax returns would not be so damning... Oops, I mean they will be.

Which is why he won't.


What does tax returns have to do with election interference or hacking the DNC servers?

Reply
Nov 26, 2019 15:47:57   #
federally indicted mattoid
 
Pennylynn wrote:
What does tax returns have to do with election interference or hacking the DNC servers?


You seem to be worried about honesty...

Reply
Nov 26, 2019 16:01:27   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
woodguru wrote:
The Mueller report listed multiple facts and witnesses corroborating Russian interference, this is an established fact...in fact the republican led senate report verified it as well.


And the same report shows that Russia favored MR. Sanders over Clinton. see page 23 of the mueller report; Internal IRA documents “referred to support for the Trump campaign and opposition to candidate Clinton,” according to the report. While much of this section of the report is redacted, it cites directions to IRA operators not to harm Sanders.

“Main idea: Use any opportunity to criticize Hillary [Clinton] and the rest (except Sanders and Trump — we support them),” quotes the report.

Allegations of the pro-Sanders strategy by Russian influencers came up in 2018, when the Justice Department charged 13 individuals and three companies with interfering illegally. and as mentioned, those 13 were not expected to appear in our courts, but have and are winning their case!

So, bottom-line… ANYONE other than Clinton as they feared worsening relations with the USA and possible war with the US.

Reply
 
 
Nov 26, 2019 16:04:56   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
You seem to be worried about honesty...


If you want to talk about the President's tax returns, please create a separate thread and I will join your discussion. This thread makes claims about election interference, and I see no reason to dilute the conversation with tax and tax privacy laws.

Reply
Nov 26, 2019 16:30:53   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Kevyn wrote:
The stated policy of Trumps own state department is to arm Ukraine to defend themselves against Russia. Trump set up a shadow group headed by Rudy and his Russian mob buddies to shake down Ukraine instead. If what he was doing is above board why not run it through the state department instead of his fixer and mobsters? Foreign policy is the president’s prerogative until it turns into extortion and bribery, Ben it is a crime.


You just don't like it because it's Trump and he's going to nail the corrupt arrangement between Burisma and the Biden's. LOL! you don't like him any way kevy, he's a white guy!

Reply
Nov 26, 2019 16:33:37   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Pennylynn wrote:
True.... plus, no one other than CrowdStrike EVER examined the servers before they disappeared.


It is funny that Crowdstrike claims they gave the FBI a copy of the server but we have never heard anything from the FBI about it.

Reply
Nov 26, 2019 16:52:30   #
woodguru
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Are you also one of those who thinks foreign policy isn't a prerogative of the president?? Ms Fiona and Mr Vindman both seem to think they dictate foreign policy and the president had better just shut up and go along. They are far from the truth.

http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-170508-1.html

I am one of those who thinks and knows that good foreign policy comes from a state department and the intelligence community, as well as the pentagon, and a president that trusts all of the mentioned parts of the mechanism that he should be listening to and trusting, rather than having a "foreign policy" if you can call it that that is entirely against the national interests in all regards.

It remains to be seen why trump put so much of a priority on already completely debunked BS to withhold military aid from the Ukraine, but whatever his "reasons", the effect was to do Putin a huge favor in the Ukraine not having anti tank weapons in time for them attacking the eastern Ukraine.

What trump did in withholding aid outside of official channels that circumvented the wishes of congress was likely done illegally, and the staffers responsible for expediting funds knew it, and reports were sent through channels trying to stop it.

Yes a president is heavily responsible for foreign policies, but also for staying within official channels and adhering to the rules and law. We do not have a king, we have a president and there are rules and guidelines for him to stay within.

Reply
 
 
Nov 26, 2019 16:54:12   #
woodguru
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
It is funny that Crowdstrike claims they gave the FBI a copy of the server but we have never heard anything from the FBI about it.

Do you know what crowdstrike is, who owns it and what they do?

Reply
Nov 26, 2019 16:59:59   #
woodguru
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
You just don't like it because it's Trump and he's going to nail the corrupt arrangement between Burisma and the Biden's. LOL! you don't like him any way kevy, he's a white guy!

Do you understand or know what the real corruption the Ukraine was fighting against is and who was involved, and how much money the Ukraine is trying to recover from those who stole billions of dollars?

To say that the Ukrainians are worried about how much money Burisma lost to the Bidens would be like saying they wanted to go after the evaporation from a lake of money that was stolen. It was not "the corruption" that Ukraine was fighting. The fact is that Giuliani's two friends Igor and Guido, and the three amigos were involved in bigger issues than the Bidens were.

Reply
Nov 26, 2019 18:05:28   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
It is funny that Crowdstrike claims they gave the FBI a copy of the server but we have never heard anything from the FBI about it.


I was not aware that CrowdStrike gave a copy of the server to the FBI....which is a headscratcher, why didn't they turn over the server? It was decommissioned and removed from the platform, served no purpose other than to collect dust. My opinion, wherever this server is, it needs to be found and reviewed by computer experts compiled of FBI, NSA, and a third party that is not CrowdStrike (hopefully a company that did not have a dog in the campaign fight). But, like the killary basement email servers while Sec of State, it has probably been destroyed.

Reply
Nov 26, 2019 18:46:38   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
woodguru wrote:
I am one of those who thinks and knows that good foreign policy comes from a state department and the intelligence community, as well as the pentagon, and a president that trusts all of the mentioned parts of the mechanism that he should be listening to and trusting, rather than having a "foreign policy" if you can call it that that is entirely against the national interests in all regards.

It remains to be seen why trump put so much of a priority on already completely debunked BS to withhold military aid from the Ukraine, but whatever his "reasons", the effect was to do Putin a huge favor in the Ukraine not having anti tank weapons in time for them attacking the eastern Ukraine.

What trump did in withholding aid outside of official channels that circumvented the wishes of congress was likely done illegally, and the staffers responsible for expediting funds knew it, and reports were sent through channels trying to stop it.

Yes a president is heavily responsible for foreign policies, but also for staying within official channels and adhering to the rules and law. We do not have a king, we have a president and there are rules and guidelines for him to stay within.
I am one of those who thinks and knows that good f... (show quote)


Under the Constitution, the president is the federal official that is primarily responsible for the relations of the United States with foreign nations. ... The president may also negotiate executive agreements with foreign powers that are not subject to Senate confirmation. The president and the executive branch have the most significant role in making foreign policy and are responsible for carrying it out. With the advice and consent of the Senate, the president makes treaties and appoints ambassadors. Some of the tools used in foreign policy are, specifically, diplomacy, sanctions, containment, collective security, deterrence, and military force.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.