byronglimish wrote:
Exactly, such changes invite chaos, confusion and instability.
That's only in your mind.
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
Oh, you mean the same stuff that every other president has done, except it's okay for them because their name isn't Trump and they didn't kick Hillary's ass in 2016.
He didn't kick Hillary's ass, she won the popular vote ding dong, he ONLY won from cheating and a split ticket.
JFlorio wrote:
Are you at all educated? Because if you are, rethink your ridiculous post. We would never again have a functioning presidency. The intelligence agencies would run Washington.
Ha, yeah, I keep forgetting I'm talking to another stable genius. The intelligence agencies would be doing their job just like they are doing now, except according to the brainwashed Trumpsters. But the crooked treasonous traitors would be ousted ASAP, none of this BS.
Barracuda2020 wrote:
That's only in your mind.
You most probably need your meds.....i'll wait.
Barracuda2020 wrote:
He didn't kick Hillary's ass, she won the popular vote ding dong, he ONLY won from cheating and a split ticket.
Na na na na Nah na. We won, we won, we won. Na na na na Nah na.
You have a terminal case of HUA. Worse than HIV.
Mike Easterday wrote:
Notice only liberals want to rewrite the Constitution.
Not only rewrite it, they want to abolish it altogether because it interferes with their plans for an invasive, all powerful, one (their) party government, the kind in which their leftist ilk dictates what rights we can and can't have.
The Constitution is their worst enemy.
lpnmajor wrote:
So, Conservative judges are getting some payback?
You mean they are GIVING some payback, don't you?
Barracuda2020 wrote:
He didn't kick Hillary's ass, she won the popular vote ding dong, he ONLY won from cheating and a split ticket.
I am aware of no accusations of cheating on the part of Trump's camp. There have been many about Hillary's camp.
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
Oh, you mean the same stuff that every other president has done, except it's okay for them because their name isn't Trump and they didn't kick Hillary's ass in 2016.
Trump lost the popular vote by 3 mill. He won three states by a total of 77,600 votes combined. Is that what you call kicking someone's ass? Me thinks you need to broaden your life experience.
marinevet73 wrote:
Trump lost the popular vote by 3 mill. He won three states by a total of 77,600 votes combined. Is that what you call kicking someone's ass? Me thinks you need to broaden your life experience.
Ever watched a horse race? If a 30:1 shot upsets the favorite, whether by a nose or 10 lengths. He kicked his ass. When are you clowns gonna figure out we don’t elect presidents by the popular vote? Presidents don’t campaign as if they’re running for the popular vote. Exactly what that dumb bitch Hillary couldn’t figure out.
Seth wrote:
Not only rewrite it, they want to abolish it altogether because it interferes with their plans for an invasive, all powerful, one (their) party government, the kind in which their leftist ilk dictates what rights we can and can't have.
The Constitution is their worst enemy.
The progs have copies of Marx' Communist Manifesto standing by to replace our Constitution if they ever get the chance. It is undeniably obvious that they have never considered the consequences should they ever succeed. They likely believe that their Utopian dream will magically be realized. I have news for them.
marinevet73 wrote:
Trump lost the popular vote by 3 mill. He won three states by a total of 77,600 votes combined. Is that what you call kicking someone's ass? Me thinks you need to broaden your life experience.
Article II, US Constitution
Section 1. The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.Under the original rules of the Constitution, each member of the Electoral College cast two electoral votes, with no distinction made between electoral votes for president and electoral votes for vice president. The presidential candidate receiving the greatest number of votes was elected president, while the presidential candidate receiving the second-most votes was elected vice president.
IOW, the president could be of one political party and the VP could be from another. Didn't work out too well, especially in the 1796 and 1800 presidential elections.
The ratification of the 12th Amendment in 1804 changed that so that the electors would cast one vote for the president and vice president. IOW, the candidates for president would choose their own VP running mate, and if whichever candidate won the most electoral votes would become POTUS and his (or her) running mate would be VP.
Me thinks you need to broaden your life experience.
Blade_Runner wrote:
The progs have copies of Marx' Communist Manifesto standing by to replace our Constitution if they ever get the chance. It is undeniably obvious that they have never considered the consequences should they ever succeed. They likely believe that their Utopian dream will magically be realized. I have news for them.
Which is why it's so difficult to find any way to have even an iota of respect for their intelligence.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.