One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
What is the big deal about this Ukrainian phone call?
Page <<first <prev 7 of 8 next>
Oct 1, 2019 01:00:28   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
I think you are not getting some facts.--Pompeo was listening to the "phone call" and said he had no knowledge of it. Barr was listening in too. 49% of Americans are for impeachment. I don't think the "strategy" is working.


You only think that because you don't know what I know.

Pompeo listening? Tell me what they've told you about that.

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 06:37:49   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
JFlorio wrote:
I

It’s 43% according to Politico. A source lefties like to sight. Barr wasn’t on the phone call. Trump told the Ukrainians he would talk to Barr. Ridiculous how gullible you guys are. There has to be a statute broken before this should be elevated to anything close to impeachment. The supposed whistleblower is starting to have big problems. We shall see. The transcripts show no quid pro quo. None. All innuendo. Do I think the call was ill advised. Yes. Stupid? Maybe. Illegal? Not in the least. No problem with Pompeo on the call of he was. What’s the problem? Read the transcripts. There is no there there.
I br br It’s 43% according to Politico. A sourc... (show quote)


I'm still not buying in to your theory. Bad stuff is coming out. there will be more in just a short time. . Hell-- trump will tweet it all out. He even re tweeted a radical preacher who called for civil war . i don't want to hear about "leftys" from you. You are defending an insane man who is a threat to our country. I am not happy any of this is happening but if you remember what I said over and over on OPP--"Trump is going to be chewed up and spit out". I was right. I like you Mike but you are wrong wrong WRONG.

Reply
Oct 1, 2019 09:54:31   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
We shall see. By the way the whole Re tweet by a radical preacher was taken completely out of context. I’d like to know what he’s done that is so dangerous. I believe the lefts assault on our 1st and 2nd Amendment are much more dangerous to our republic than goofy Trump.
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
I'm still not buying in to your theory. Bad stuff is coming out. there will be more in just a short time. . Hell-- trump will tweet it all out. He even re tweeted a radical preacher who called for civil war . i don't want to hear about "leftys" from you. You are defending an insane man who is a threat to our country. I am not happy any of this is happening but if you remember what I said over and over on OPP--"Trump is going to be chewed up and spit out". I was right. I like you Mike but you are wrong wrong WRONG.
I'm still not buying in to your theory. Bad stuff ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Oct 1, 2019 11:20:24   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
permafrost wrote:
Seems as if we Dems are not the only one concerned.. and very rightly so..

this is a post on Quora... and very timely..

Why is it controversial that Donald Trump asked the Ukranian president to investigate Biden?


It is a violation of federal law, and it is a felony, and the violation calls for five years in a federal penitentiary.

There is this very important law that states that no American can solicit any help from someone from outside of the United States (a foreign national) when it comes to any election. An American cannot accept any help — if it comes from outside of the United States, and it is election help. This law is not new, and the law makes sense.

It can be the guy running for mayor in your own town, or a person running for the President of the United States. You cannot ask a foreign person for money, to help in an election. You cannot ask them to run ads, on the TV, or on the Internet. Not if it is to help in any election in the United States. You cannot ask them to engage in spying on your election opponent, to try to dig up dirt. You cannot ask a foreigner for any help, or any aid, or any assistance — in any way — when it comes to any election in the United States of America. Not if it is a foreigner, or a foreign government.

You cannot ask them to conduct an investigation on an election opponent.

Because, that is “aiding” your election. Because, they are not Americans.

(Note — The United States has plenty of agencies which it uses to conduct investigations. You cannot try to deceive voters into who is conducting an investigation — the US, or some foreign government...)

The United States of America prefers that our elections be an internal matter — so that democracy is preserved. The United States of America prefers that its elections be conducted strictly by the United States of America. The United States does not want some other foreign government to be able to “control” our elected officials, or to be able to “blackmail” our elected officials, or to be able to literally run our own government as a sort of “puppet government…” — a government where the elected leader must always do as the the foreigner (a foreign government) demands.

It is an important law. Some would argue, it is one of the most important laws that there is.

Here is the law:

2 U.S.C. § 30121 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 52. Voting and Elections § 30121. Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

52 U.S.C. § 30121 - U.S. Code Title 52. Voting and Elections § 30121 | FindLaw

Trump confirms he discussed Biden with Ukraine as some Dems call for impeachment — CBS News.



In this case, there is also a secondary law that may have been broken. It has to do with the appearance that Donald Trump may have actually altered our foreign policy, to stop some money that was supposed to be paid to this foreign government — and then, told that foreign leader that the only way they could get the money would be if they investigated his own political opponent, in the next election. That appears to be the case, but we are still waiting to find that out for certain. For some reason, the payment to this foreign government was “halted” just a few days before these phone conversations. For no apparent reason. Coincidence? Then, after the phone conversations, Trump suddenly allowed the money to be transferred to the foreign government. IF that was related to the issue above — we now have about six new felonies… We do not have the transcripts of the phone calls yet, so we do not yet know.

Trump Ordered Aid to Ukraine Frozen Days Before Call With Its Leader

Why is the Trump-Ukraine whistleblower scandal so serious?
Seems as if we Dems are not the only one concerned... (show quote)


Intel Community Secretly Gutted Requirement Of First-Hand Whistleblower Knowledge
https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/27/intel-community-secretly-gutted-requirement-of-first-hand-whistleblower-knowledge/

Federal records show that the intelligence community secretly revised the formal whistleblower complaint form in August 2019 to eliminate the requirement of direct, first-hand knowledge of wrongdoing.
Sean DavisBy Sean Davis
SEPTEMBER 27, 2019
Between May 2018 and August 2019, the intelligence community secretly eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct, first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoings. This raises questions about the intelligence community’s behavior regarding the August submission of a whistleblower complaint against President Donald Trump. The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.

The brand new version of the whistleblower complaint form, which was not made public until after the transcript of Trump’s July 25 phone call with the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and the complaint addressed to Congress were made public, eliminates the first-hand knowledge requirement and allows employees to file whistleblower complaints even if they have zero direct knowledge of underlying evidence and only “heard about [wrongdoing] from others.”

The internal properties of the newly revised “Disclosure of Urgent Concern” form, which the intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) requires to be submitted under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act (ICWPA), show that the document was uploaded on September 24, 2019, at 4:25 p.m., just days before the anti-Trump complaint was declassified and released to the public. The markings on the document state that it was revised in August 2019, but no specific date of revision is disclosed.

The complaint alleges that President Donald Trump broke the law during a phone call with the Ukrainian president. In his complaint, which was dated August 12, 2019, the complainant acknowledged he was “not a direct witness” to the wrongdoing he claims Trump committed.

A previous version of the whistleblower complaint document, which the ICIG and DNI until recently provided to potential whistleblowers, declared that any complaint must contain only first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoing and that complaints that provide only hearsay, rumor, or gossip would be rejected.

“The [Intelligence Community Inspector General] cannot transmit information via the ICPWA based on an employee’s second-hand knowledge of wrongdoing,” the previous form stated under the bolded heading “FIRST-HAND INFORMATION REQUIRED.” “This includes information received from another person, such as when an employee informs you that he/she witnessed some type of wrongdoing.”

“If you think that wrongdoing took place, but can provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions, [the Intelligence Community Inspector General] will not be able to process the complaint or information for submission as an ICWPA,” the form concluded.

Markings on the previous version of the Disclosure of Urgent Concern form show that it was formally approved on May 24, 2018. Here is that original Disclosure of Urgent Concern form prior to the August 2019 revision:....

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 00:14:28   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
JFlorio wrote:
We shall see. By the way the whole Re tweet by a radical preacher was taken completely out of context. I’d like to know what he’s done that is so dangerous. I believe the lefts assault on our 1st and 2nd Amendment are much more dangerous to our republic than goofy Trump.


There is no assault on the first and second amendments. Do you give a fig about any of the other amendments?.. Re tweeting the radical preacher was irresponsible and sent a message that civil war is the way to solve our problems. Inciting mayhem is not patriotic and is a crime.

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 00:21:11   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
BigMike wrote:
You only think that because you don't know what I know.

Pompeo listening? Tell me what they've told you about that.


You know if you have tuned into the news. I am certain you know but just want play me for a while.

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 10:44:56   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
There is no assault on the first and second amendments. Do you give a fig about any of the other amendments?.. Re tweeting the radical preacher was irresponsible and sent a message that civil war is the way to solve our problems. Inciting mayhem is not patriotic and is a crime.


"There is no assault on the first and second amendments." - Coos Bay Tom

Yes there is.

Is is the liberal Left doing all the censoring.
Including Facebook and You Tube.

Watch Rachel Maddow get that STUPID SMIRK wiped off her face by Trump's Election
>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Ut0TaegQ-kw <<<< this was removed;
SOOOOOOO

Watch Rachel Maddow get that STUPID SMIRK wiped off her face by Trump's Election
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kei5QXLQ_kk

Reply
 
 
Oct 2, 2019 10:53:43   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
There is no assault on the first and second amendments. Do you give a fig about any of the other amendments?.. Re tweeting the radical preacher was irresponsible and sent a message that civil war is the way to solve our problems. Inciting mayhem is not patriotic and is a crime.


Like I said the tweet (stupid) was taken out of context. The Second Amendment actually guarantees the protections of the others. If you don't think there is an assault on free speech you are either clueless or too busy to pay attention. Check out college campuses. Conservative speakers, such as Ben Shapiro of all people are considered harbingers of hate speech and barred from many colleges. NY City just passed a law (will, be found Unconstitutional) that if you say the words in public, illegal alien you can be fined. You have Democrat candidates actually saying, yes we will come and get your assault rifle. Not that the idiots even know what an assault rifle would be. You may want them to take my AR 15, but according to the Constitution that would be illegal search and seizure and I don't give a damn whether you or some politician surrounded by armed body guards think I shouldn't be allowed to have one.

Reply
Oct 2, 2019 11:02:23   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
JFlorio wrote:
Like I said the tweet (stupid) was taken out of context. The Second Amendment actually guarantees the protections of the others. If you don't think there is an assault on free speech you are either clueless or too busy to pay attention. Check out college campuses. Conservative speakers, such as Ben Shapiro of all people are considered harbingers of hate speech and barred from many colleges. NY City just passed a law (will, be found Unconstitutional) that if you say the words in public, illegal alien you can be fined. You have Democrat candidates actually saying, yes we will come and get your assault rifle. Not that the idiots even know what an assault rifle would be. You may want them to take my AR 15, but according to the Constitution that would be illegal search and seizure and I don't give a damn whether you or some politician surrounded by armed body guards think I shouldn't be allowed to have one.
Like I said the tweet (stupid) was taken out of co... (show quote)


AND!!!!
We will continue to pump our own gas!
We do not live in Oregon.

Reply
Oct 3, 2019 01:02:16   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
eagleye13 wrote:
"There is no assault on the first and second amendments." - Coos Bay Tom

Yes there is.

Is is the liberal Left doing all the censoring.
Including Facebook and You Tube.

Watch Rachel Maddow get that STUPID SMIRK wiped off her face by Trump's Election
>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Ut0TaegQ-kw <<<< this was removed;
SOOOOOOO

Watch Rachel Maddow get that STUPID SMIRK wiped off her face by Trump's Election
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kei5QXLQ_kk
"There is no assault on the first and second ... (show quote)


I choose to not believe this as The constitution gives us free speech. I do notice that right wing news sources often give entirely different accounts and opinions on the same news story. just an observation.

Reply
Oct 3, 2019 01:07:01   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
JFlorio wrote:
Like I said the tweet (stupid) was taken out of context. The Second Amendment actually guarantees the protections of the others. If you don't think there is an assault on free speech you are either clueless or too busy to pay attention. Check out college campuses. Conservative speakers, such as Ben Shapiro of all people are considered harbingers of hate speech and barred from many colleges. NY City just passed a law (will, be found Unconstitutional) that if you say the words in public, illegal alien you can be fined. You have Democrat candidates actually saying, yes we will come and get your assault rifle. Not that the idiots even know what an assault rifle would be. You may want them to take my AR 15, but according to the Constitution that would be illegal search and seizure and I don't give a damn whether you or some politician surrounded by armed body guards think I shouldn't be allowed to have one.
Like I said the tweet (stupid) was taken out of co... (show quote)


Well then just get on with your bad self And for the record I believe in strict background checks to keep the wrong people from buying guns. If you are not a risk then you can have all the guns you want.--I do and I intend to buy more.

Reply
 
 
Oct 3, 2019 01:37:24   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
Well then just get on with your bad self And for the record I believe in strict background checks to keep the wrong people from buying guns. If you are not a risk then you can have all the guns you want.--I do and I intend to buy more.


Good for you. You just trust the bureaucrats way more than I do. Please check with Smedley Buzzkill. Honestly he has the stats on all the background checks that have been failed and the number prosecuted. It’s eye opening. Background checks won’t keep a criminal from buying a gun illegally.

Reply
Oct 3, 2019 10:29:00   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
JFlorio wrote:
Good for you. You just trust the bureaucrats way more than I do. Please check with Smedley Buzzkill. Honestly he has the stats on all the background checks that have been failed and the number prosecuted. It’s eye opening. Background checks won’t keep a criminal from buying a gun illegally.


I know all about the easy access to fire arms but it is true that the majority of mass killings were done with legally obtained firearms. I know that here are those in government that come up with dumb ass ideas that really hurt the cause. Debate and compromise is how government is supposed to work things out to find common ground.

Reply
Oct 3, 2019 10:35:36   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Coos Bay Tom wrote:
I know all about the easy access to fire arms but it is true that the majority of mass killings were done with legally obtained firearms. I know that here are those in government that come up with dumb ass ideas that really hurt the cause. Debate and compromise is how government is supposed to work things out to find common ground.


Actually many of those mass shootings were done with legally purchased firearms. However, not purchased by the shooter. Mass murders are horrific, but many many more murders are done with handguns in our large cities every weekend and not a peep from most. All most all those guns are obtained illegally. Most being killed weekly are black men by other black men. Most mass shootings are white men killing white people. Makes me wonder about congress's real agenda. It's obvious I don't trust the ass hates in Washington D.C.. That's one thing I am bi-partisan about. Both side suck.

Reply
Oct 4, 2019 09:13:03   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
JFlorio wrote:
Actually many of those mass shootings were done with legally purchased firearms. However, not purchased by the shooter. Mass murders are horrific, but many many more murders are done with handguns in our large cities every weekend and not a peep from most. All most all those guns are obtained illegally. Most being killed weekly are black men by other black men. Most mass shootings are white men killing white people. Makes me wonder about congress's real agenda. It's obvious I don't trust the ass hates in Washington D.C.. That's one thing I am bi-partisan about. Both side suck.
Actually many of those mass shootings were done wi... (show quote)


They lack the courage to do their job

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 8 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.