MSM Defends CIA’s “Whistleblower”, Ignores Actual Whistleblowers
Sep 27, 2019 14:26:44 #
Sep 28, 2019 06:15:30 #
debeda wrote:
Plain TRUTH, ACP img src="https://static.onepolit... (show quote)
I wonder who controls, the MSM, or the dems.
Sep 28, 2019 07:13:43 #
Kevyn wrote:
There is nothing to defend, an employee recognized wrongdoing and followed the proper procedure to report it and did. He did his duty to his nation, his duty to justice and his duty to the office of President.
I disagree. It does not pass the "smell test".
Between the time of Trump's July 25 phone call and the August "whistleblower complaint", "the US intelligence community quietly eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers must provide first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoings".
"A previous version of the document provided by the ICIG and DNI until recently declared that whistleblower complaints must only contain first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoing - and made clear that hearsay, gossip or rumor would be rejected.
"The [Intelligence Community Inspector General] cannot transmit information via the ICPWA based on an employee’s second-hand knowledge of wrongdoing," reads the prior version of the form, which contains the bolded heading: "FIRST-HAND INFORMATION REQUIRED," and "This includes information received from another person, such as when an employee informs you that he/she witnessed some type of wrongdoing."
"If you think that wrongdoing took place, but can provide nothing more than second-hand or unsubstantiated assertions, [the Intelligence Community Inspector General] will not be able to process the complaint or information for submission as an ICWPA," the form concludes."
To me, it certainly appears that someone in the intelligence community made this change in policy and procedure to trigger the controversy on the issue of this complaint being required to be reported to congress.
Is it logical to rely on "repeated references to what anonymous officials allegedly told the complainant"?
Does this sound like a logical and responsible change in policy? No, it was designed to create a problem for the Trump administration, while ignoring real and actual evidence of corruption by Joe and Hunter Biden.
Sep 28, 2019 08:59:14 #
tophat wrote:
I wonder who controls, the MSM, or the dems.
Hard telling which, but pretty clear who or whatever it is wants to being down the United States
Sep 28, 2019 09:00:28 #
Sep 28, 2019 09:06:39 #
Kevyn wrote:
Of course not but that is irrelevant, it is more t... (show quote)
Unknow to you and your nazi's is a treaty signed by Bill Clinton giving both countries the right to ask for
help in tracking down corruption. Pelosi did not or can not read it seems. So Trump asking the Ukraine to look at Biden's crap is totally legal. It's obvious your club of morans is desperate to find and tiny little anthill to get rid of Trump, it's sad to watch.
Sep 28, 2019 09:26:35 #
Peewee
Loc: San Antonio, TX
Gatsby wrote:
Why is one lone (rogue) CIA agent conducting his/her own private(?) "counter-intelligence operation"
against the POTUS?
against the POTUS?
Because they went rouge a long time ago, like WWII. They have always served the Central Banksters. Just a few years ago they were caught spying on the Senate. They are legally only allowed to operate outside the US. So they got foreign intel agencies to spy on us for them. That's what the Five Eye stuff is all about.
Sep 28, 2019 09:30:34 #
Peewee
Loc: San Antonio, TX
Kevyn wrote:
There is nothing to defend, an employee recognized wrongdoing and followed the proper procedure to report it and did. He did his duty to his nation, his duty to justice and his duty to the office of President.
BS, so how did that little law saying a whistleblower had to have first-hand knowledge get changed with no one knowing? Can you even spell CIA?
Sep 28, 2019 09:56:43 #
MR Mister wrote:
Unknow to you and your nazi's is a treaty signed by Bill Clinton giving both countries the right to ask for
help in tracking down corruption. Pelosi did not or can not read it seems. So Trump asking the Ukraine to look at Biden's crap is totally legal. It's obvious your club of morans is desperate to find and tiny little anthill to get rid of Trump, it's sad to watch.
help in tracking down corruption. Pelosi did not or can not read it seems. So Trump asking the Ukraine to look at Biden's crap is totally legal. It's obvious your club of morans is desperate to find and tiny little anthill to get rid of Trump, it's sad to watch.
Sep 28, 2019 11:16:39 #
Sep 28, 2019 16:47:23 #
Gatsby wrote:
Why is one lone (rogue) CIA agent conducting his/her own private(?) "counter-intelligence operation"
against the POTUS?
against the POTUS?
She isn't alone. I've gotten 4 names and they all lead to Brennan and Clapper.
Sep 28, 2019 17:25:16 #
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
She isn't alone. I've gotten 4 names and they all lead to Brennan and Clapper.
Figures
Sep 29, 2019 11:10:41 #
tophat wrote:
I wonder who controls, the MSM, or the dems.
They are all related by blood, fact. Most if not all the CEO's on CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN and the NY Times have
brothers or cousins in the Federal government. All are liberals.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.