Exactly. The alarmists make that the "obvious" connection. They are not correct, but in their heads, it's a given.
Is it because our schools and colleges are teaching (brain washing) the students who think they are learning the truth when it is lies rather than FACT. Sad to be educated and still not know the truth.
This is an informative article which again, makes the ASSUMPTION that a rise in CO2 levels brought on warming. It is an assumption without basis. There is more evidence that CO2 levels rise AFTER warming, not before.
The article also dramatizes the state of the earth suggesting that it is like a dry desert. Wrong again! The point being, when "science" writes about something with a preconceived notion, they twist the information to fit their image of that notion.
This is an informative article which again, makes ... (show quote)
I saw an article that had made a point of the earthquake in Japan being a 9.0 caused the earth to tip on its axis. This was minute by earth standards but never the less it may have caused conditions to change around the world.
Is it because our schools and colleges are teaching (brain washing) the students who think they are learning the truth when it is lies rather than FACT. Sad to be educated and still not know the truth.
I saw an article that had made a point of the earthquake in Japan being a 9.0 caused the earth to tip on its axis. This was minute by earth standards but never the less it may have caused conditions to change around the world.
Antartic ice cores revel that CO2 climbing follows global warming not preceeds it. Also, higher CO2 in the atmosphere is better for growing things like food.
We learned we breathe out carbon dioxide and the plants turn it into CO2. It makes them green and it keeps us breathing. Maybe the problem is they've made to many parking lots and cut down too much green stuff .
This is an informative article which again, makes the ASSUMPTION that a rise in CO2 levels brought on warming. It is an assumption without basis. There is more evidence that CO2 levels rise AFTER warming, not before.
The article also dramatizes the state of the earth suggesting that it is like a dry desert. Wrong again! The point being, when "science" writes about something with a preconceived notion, they twist the information to fit their image of that notion.
The bubble heads should be concerned about the falling levels of oxygen. Oxygen levels are down almost 50% below levels in the distant past. last I heard we all HAVE to have oxygen. Also they should Google Maluten Malinkovic if they want to know the real reason for our climate changes.