This is an informative article which again, makes the ASSUMPTION that a rise in CO2 levels brought on warming. It is an assumption without basis. There is more evidence that CO2 levels rise AFTER warming, not before.
The article also dramatizes the state of the earth suggesting that it is like a dry desert. Wrong again! The point being, when "science" writes about something with a preconceived notion, they twist the information to fit their image of that notion.
This is an informative article which again, makes the ASSUMPTION that a rise in CO2 levels brought on warming. It is an assumption without basis. There is more evidence that CO2 levels rise AFTER warming, not before.
The article also dramatizes the state of the earth suggesting that it is like a dry desert. Wrong again! The point being, when "science" writes about something with a preconceived notion, they twist the information to fit their image of that notion.
This is an informative article which again, makes the ASSUMPTION that a rise in CO2 levels brought on warming. It is an assumption without basis. There is more evidence that CO2 levels rise AFTER warming, not before.
The article also dramatizes the state of the earth suggesting that it is like a dry desert. Wrong again! The point being, when "science" writes about something with a preconceived notion, they twist the information to fit their image of that notion.
This is an informative article which again, makes ... (show quote)
Antartic ice cores revel that CO2 climbing follows g****l w*****g not preceeds it. Also, higher CO2 in the atmosphere is better for growing things like food.
Antartic ice cores revel that CO2 climbing follows g****l w*****g not preceeds it. Also, higher CO2 in the atmosphere is better for growing things like food.
Exactly. I have pointed that out many, many times and the alarmists continue to either rationalize it through pure speculative "reasoning" to support their "man causing this" agenda or simply ignore it and continue to their assumption that it's warming, CO2 is up and thus it must be that CO2 caused it. The idea that correlation doesn't equal causation is beyond them. I have noticed that the concentration of fire fighters is rather his in areas where there is fire. You can take it from there! Using their reasoning it must be that firefighters cause fires!!
Exactly. I have pointed that out many, many times and the alarmists continue to either rationalize it through pure speculative "reasoning" to support their "man causing this" agenda or simply ignore it and continue to their assumption that it's warming, CO2 is up and thus it must be that CO2 caused it. The idea that correlation doesn't equal causation is beyond them. I have noticed that the concentration of fire fighters is rather his in areas where there is fire. You can take it from there! Using their reasoning it must be that firefighters cause fires!!
Exactly. I have pointed that out many, many times... (show quote)
That's what my grade 3 reader said! Lush and green!
We learned we breathe out carbon dioxide and the plants turn it into CO2. It makes them green and it keeps us breathing. Maybe the problem is they've made to many parking lots and cut down too much green stuff .
We learned we breathe out carbon dioxide and the plants turn it into CO2. It makes them green and it keeps us breathing. Maybe the problem is they've made to many parking lots and cut down too much green stuff .