Mikeyavelli wrote:
Relax, he's our Messiah, you understand, you had one.
Trump is divested of his businesses, and if you kommiecrats thought you had a sliver of a chance to prosecute him for emoluments violations you would.
Trump set that up to be compliant with the law.
Illegals are just that, illegal and nowhere in the Constitution does it provide for illegal immigration.
Mueller's entire report is not credible. Mueller failed and the report is firing back on the kommiecrats.
I love Trump, he's probably the best president in modern history, and fights back in an unorthodox way to keep America safe and as founded.
Relax, he's our Messiah, you understand, you ha... (
show quote)
Mikeyavelli wrote, "...nowhere in the Constitution does it provide for illegal immigration."
Exactly, nowhere in the Constitution does it limit immigration or make it illegal. In fact, just the opposite, Article I, Section 9, Clause 1:
The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
Here's an interesting link:
https://www.boundless.com/blog/u-s-constitution-immigration/Wherein:
The U.S. Constitution gives very few specifics about the way U.S. immigration policy should look, but it provides broad guidelines as to who has authority to make such policy, as well as the legal means for challenges to elements of that policy.
In Article I, Section 8, the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the responsibility “To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,” determining how immigrants can become citizens. Despite this charge, many states enacted their own immigration policies during the Republic’s early years. According to the University of California, Irvine law professor Jennifer Chacon, “for the first century of the United States’ existence, many states enacted laws regulating and controlling immigration into their own borders. Various states passed laws aimed at preventing a variety of populations from entering the borders of their states, including individuals with criminal records, people reliant on public assistance, slaves, and free blacks.”
Since the late 19th century, the U.S. Supreme court has consistently backed the federal immigration regulations against constitutional challenges. Still, Chacon writes, “Notwithstanding the letter of the law, federal immigration law is always mediated by powerful intervening forces at the state and local level.”
-------------------------------------------------