One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
21 lies trump told last week
Page <<first <prev 13 of 22 next> last>>
Aug 18, 2019 01:00:15   #
trucksterbud
 
factnotfiction wrote:
He is either a pathological liar or he is the most stupid president ever.

But you never hear about his 'gaffes' on his fox propaganda media outlet

The funny thing, trump is making Joe Biden look smart



https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/14/politics/weekly-fact-check-donald-trump-21-false/index.html


No wonder you seem fouled up between the ears. Knowing you watch CNN makes me feel smart. Joe Biden look smart..?? That isn't even possible... Unless you watch CNN....

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 06:21:59   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Fit2BTied wrote:
Just curious. What's it take, IQ-wise for someone to be such an elitist jackwagon? Your attitude toward roughly half the US population leads me to question your actual value as an "educator". I'm willing to bet more than a few of the folks you consider "hill billies [sic] and uneducated white thrash [sic]" would kick your narcissistic behind in an IQ test. Are you truly MENSA material, or is all that self-puffery based on anything one might consider hard evidence. I mean, just because you put others down, doesn't actually make you superior except in your own obtuse mind.
Just curious. What's it take, IQ-wise for someone ... (show quote)


MENSA? More likely the sister organization geared to those who could not quite measure up to Mensa standards. It's called Densa.
Liberal pseudo-intellectuals provide me with a continuous source of amusement. Every time I do or say something I think is kind of stupid, all I have to do is read one of the Liberal diatribes here on OPP and I realize I'm not so bad.
What is even funnier is that I was born in the Smoky Mountains. The quintessential hillbilly, whose education is considerably better than most of the southpaw polymath poseurs whose sole claim to cerebral superiority seems to lie in their ability to parrot what someone else figured out.
Have you noticed that the typical Liberal "intellectual" is as casual with other peoples' intellectual property as their less than erudite "colleagues" are with other peoples' money?

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 11:00:24   #
kemmer
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
MENSA? More likely the sister organization geared to those who could not quite measure up to Mensa standards. It's called Densa.
Liberal pseudo-intellectuals provide me with a continuous source of amusement. Every time I do or say something I think is kind of stupid, all I have to do is read one of the Liberal diatribes here on OPP and I realize I'm not so bad.
What is even funnier is that I was born in the Smoky Mountains. The quintessential hillbilly, whose education is considerably better than most of the southpaw polymath poseurs whose sole claim to cerebral superiority seems to lie in their ability to parrot what someone else figured out.
Have you noticed that the typical Liberal "intellectual" is as casual with other peoples' intellectual property as their less than erudite "colleagues" are with other peoples' money?
MENSA? More likely the sister organization geared ... (show quote)

Talk about a poseur! Physician, heal thyself.

Reply
 
 
Aug 18, 2019 11:51:21   #
JoyV
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
There is no coffin. Only those who are dangerous to Hillary get coffins.
Those who know the market know why it plunged, but it's not due to bubbles or fundamental weakness.
Those who don't know the market get their hopes up that it will tank and they will be back on the government welfare roles.
Google, Amazon, Apple and Microsoft will try to tank the market before the election. It's too early now. The international markets are wobbly because of socialists and muslims weakening the economy outside the United States.
China doesn't have a prayer in the trade war, and America will be the economic and military power it's always been, except for the Obama years.
There is no coffin. Only those who are dangerous ... (show quote)


You wrote, "China doesn't have a prayer in the trade war." No, not anymore. Under G.W. Bush, the trade war with China began moving in China's favor, but still the US was well ahead. Under Obama, the trade war ratcheted up with our side surrendering more and more of our advantage to China until it looked like we would lose it completely. Now the balance is rapidly shifting back to a strong USA. Unless there is a drastic change, we will not lose to China.

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 11:56:43   #
Mikeyavelli
 
JoyV wrote:
You wrote, "China doesn't have a prayer in the trade war." No, not anymore. Under G.W. Bush, the trade war with China began moving in China's favor, but still the US was well ahead. Under Obama, the trade war ratcheted up with our side surrendering more and more of our advantage to China until it looked like we would lose it completely. Now the balance is rapidly shifting back to a strong USA. Unless there is a drastic change, we will not lose to China.


China will lose quickly in the trade war.
We buy their toys.
China buys our food.
Who's going to get hungry first?

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 11:59:14   #
kemmer
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
China will lose quickly in the trade war.
We buy their toys.
China buys our food.
Who's going to get hungry first?

China's not buying our food anymore. It's American farmers who are starving.

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 12:14:43   #
JoyV
 
Barracuda2020 wrote:
I agree to half of what you say, communists may very well be extreme socialists and you are correct it can only be done by an authoritarian rule, who takes the freedom of choice away from the people, I don't know one American from the left or the right who would want that to happen.

No, not all liberals love communism, I would say none because if what you're saying is true, they wouldn't be a liberal my friend, they would be a communist, you see how that works don't you? Just as a Democrat is not a liberal, there are differences in their ideologies. But as of late the far right in their propaganda agenda, want to whitewash everyone the same color to anyone who is left of the far right. This really does hurts America, as we've witnessed the damage this polarization causes, in its intention to divide us, and it is working very efficiently, wouldn't you agree?
I agree to half of what you say, communists may ve... (show quote)


You wrote, "...who takes the freedom of choice away from the people, I don't know one American from the left or the right who would want that to happen."

What about all the Americans who favor elimination of our 1st Amendment, or even the entire Bill of Rights and some Articles or clauses in our constitution? This runs the gamut from political correctness, to shouting down those whose speech you don't approve of, to violently attacking those whose ideologies you don't approve of. And when someone who does not have an opposing view is beaten up because they just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time; it is shrugged off.

Analyzing the General Social Survey (which is a survey the left approves of given to college students from coast to coast) finds that even though students answered they were in favor of allowing a public speech by a controversial speaker, such as a communist or a militant atheist, among all respondents with college experience, majorities of Democrats believed that speakers expressing offensive or controversial views should not be allowed to give a talk on their campus even if invited. Sizable minorities of Republicans agreed. In other words, speech advocating communism or militant reaction against those who don't agree with the accepted narrative of the left; are not offensive.

So these Americans are in favor of giving up their first Amendment rights to be dictated by their leadership on what speech is to be permitted.

Reply
 
 
Aug 18, 2019 12:19:00   #
JoyV
 
kemmer wrote:
Trump has really semi-legitimized the crazies in our midst.


Even if you were correct (In other words correct in Constitutionalists and conservatives being crazies), what about Obama FULLY legitimizing those in favor of dismantling our constitution?

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 12:20:32   #
JoyV
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
MENSA? More likely the sister organization geared to those who could not quite measure up to Mensa standards. It's called Densa.
Liberal pseudo-intellectuals provide me with a continuous source of amusement. Every time I do or say something I think is kind of stupid, all I have to do is read one of the Liberal diatribes here on OPP and I realize I'm not so bad.
What is even funnier is that I was born in the Smoky Mountains. The quintessential hillbilly, whose education is considerably better than most of the southpaw polymath poseurs whose sole claim to cerebral superiority seems to lie in their ability to parrot what someone else figured out.
Have you noticed that the typical Liberal "intellectual" is as casual with other peoples' intellectual property as their less than erudite "colleagues" are with other peoples' money?
MENSA? More likely the sister organization geared ... (show quote)



Reply
Aug 18, 2019 12:21:01   #
JoyV
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
China will lose quickly in the trade war.
We buy their toys.
China buys our food.
Who's going to get hungry first?


YUP!

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 12:21:35   #
Mikeyavelli
 
kemmer wrote:
China's not buying our food anymore. It's American farmers who are starving.


Brazil can't meet China's needs for Soy beans.
China is starving, the American farmers are subsidized.

Reply
 
 
Aug 18, 2019 12:38:33   #
JoyV
 
kemmer wrote:
China's not buying our food anymore. It's American farmers who are starving.


Not true.
https://www.chinabusinessreview.com/what-america-exports-to-china/

But even without the figures, where would China get enough food to feed their populous if the didn't import it from us. What other country produces more surplus food to be able to export in such high amounts for such low cost. And yes even with the tariffs, the cost of our food exports are still low.

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 12:40:51   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO
 
JoyV wrote:
Not true.
https://www.chinabusinessreview.com/what-america-exports-to-china/

But even without the figures, where would China get enough food to feed their populous if the didn't import it from us. What other country produces more surplus food to be able to export in such high amounts for such low cost. And yes even with the tariffs, the cost of our food exports are still low.


Thank you Joy~



Reply
Aug 18, 2019 13:37:32   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
kemmer wrote:
Talk about a poseur! Physician, heal thyself.


I'm not the poseur.

Reply
Aug 18, 2019 14:01:39   #
kemmer
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Brazil can't meet China's needs for Soy beans.
China is starving, the American farmers are subsidized.

Oh get a clue. Mainland Chinese will do or eat whatever Chairman Xi tells them to, or be sent to re-education camps.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 13 of 22 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.