Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Many people will be caught up by that law even if they are in no way attempting to "injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person", if we are going by the language of the first part.
If we are to go by the second part, the portion in bold blue text, the part that James Buchal seems to be hinting at with the "...that make it a felony for groups of people to run around in masks attacking other people for exercising their First Amendment rights" comment, That portion too was left far too vague and it can adversely affect people that have no criminal intent at heart. Parents may be somewhat disappointed when they have to pick their kiddies up from the police station next Halloween. Remind me to warn anybody intent on engaging in performance art on Portland streets if they enforce that statute. A live nativity scene in Portland Could be toast due to that Statute.
Many people will be caught up by that law even if ... (
show quote)
That’s an interesting perspective.
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
His being gay SHOULDN'T be a factor and I don't think it played any role, though I could be wrong, I just don't think Antifa would target someone for being gay.
Right.... just the ones that don’t agree with them. I mentioned it for contrast purposes, and it’s true.
P.S.
I think there’s been a sufficient amount of information put out by now to have formed an opinion.... so, how about now, ready to condemn this behavior?