Yes I understand that part but you do not reference the OT description of Gods psychopathic behavior; genocide, summary executions, unimaginable cruelties and punishments inflicted for what would be viewed today as simple human failings.
Was the OT a fake news chronicle of those times for purposes of control and subjugation of the masses by the Leaders of
the day or is it just a fable of myths interwoven with, and contributed to by many tribal faiths over a long period of time, but with the same basic agenda? Either way it presents a dark side of the human psyche and
brings into question for many of us the fallibility of a faith not prepared to disown it.

You are speaking in generalities and therefore you are getting answers in generalities.

What exact "God's psycopathic" behavior are you referring to? Give a specific example that you feel is beneath God. Just because you don't know what God's reasons may be, and I may not either, doesn't, by that fact, make them "psycopathic".

For example, the response to genocide: because it is God's right to cut off a people who have so corrupted themselves that even He can't see a possible redemption. Did you know that the Bible says:

“Precious in the sight of Yahweh is the death of his saints.” Psalm 116:15

Do you know why that is? It’s because, for a saint of God, to be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord. I don't seek death, but as a blood-bought, born-again, child of God, I look forward to it, all in God's good time, nor do I mourn the death of loved ones in the faith. Why? Because death is the ultimate release from this world of sin, pain and suffering...and trials! But don’t think for a moment that means God doesn’t hold all life precious, because He does, and that is why He has declared murder to be one of the top sins. Many, if not all, of the nations who God had Israel wipe out sacrificed/murdered their children on altars (like how abortionists sacrifice their babies on the altar of sexual pleasure these days). God considered this cultural norm of theirs very evil, and worthy of death: cutting off the whole family or tribe so as not to pollute others. Seems to me, and I haven't catalogued it, that whenever God told Israel He was going to use them as His agent in executing judgement, He typically told them why they were being cut off from the living. If you say you want evil to end, but you don't have the ability to reform any and all evil-doers, through free-will, then who are you to judge God who does know, even the hearts and intentions of people and thus who needs to be cut off, and why, and when it will do the most good, for the greater majority, for the purpose of teaching us and the rest of eternity that choices have consequences.

Furthermore, it is written: “Jesus summoned them, saying, "Allow the little children to come to me, and don't hinder them, for the Kingdom of God belongs to such as these.” Luke 18:16. Did you know that God doesn’t condemn anyone to eternal death who has not committed sin? And children who don’t know or understand are not accountable, and thus do not have the judgment of death hanging over them? That means that cutting off a family line, would be a merciful act from the ultimate perspective of a child who would have followed in the sins of the family...

“3As I live, says the Lord Yahweh... 4Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul who sins, he shall die... 20The soul who sins, he shall die: the son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son; the righteousness of the righteous shall be on him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be on him.” Ezekiel 18:3-4,20

“Bearing” the iniquity of the fathers is not the same as “visiting” the iniquity of the fathers on the children. It is an observable fact that children emulate their parents, and when they grow to adulthood, they either choose to be like their parents in attitude, or, in some cases, consciously choose not to be like their parents.

So, you first need to prove that you know, better than God, what the ultimate state of the peoples He had destroyed would be, that it could be proven they could have been reformed by less drastic means, before you can stand in judgement of His actions. And, failing that, you also have to stand in judgement of the people He condemned, to prove they did nothing worthy of death. And finally, you need to consider that when God created mankind, He gave Adam a commandment not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil lest he would die. And of course he did eat and brought death upon mankind. So, in order to condemn God, you will first have to prove that God is unjust for imposing commandments on people regarding what constitutes moral behavior and what doesn’t. But it doesn't end there, because then you will also have to know, ultimately, who only died in the flesh in this world (which the bible likens to sleep) but will live again in the resurrection; because the story isn't over yet.

You are speaking in generalities and therefore you are getting answers in generalities.

What exact "God's psycopathic" behavior are you referring to? Give a specific example that you feel is beneath God. Just because you don't know what God's reasons may be, and I may not either, doesn't, by that fact, make them "psycopathic".

For example, the response to genocide: because it is God's right to cut off a people who have so corrupted themselves that even He can't see a possible redemption. Did you know that the Bible says:

“Precious in the sight of Yahweh is the death of his saints.” Psalm 116:15

Do you know why that is? It’s because, for a saint of God, to be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord. I don't seek death, but as a blood-bought, born-again, child of God, I look forward to it, all in God's good time, nor do I mourn the death of loved ones in the faith. Why? Because death is the ultimate release from this world of sin, pain and suffering...and trials! But don’t think for a moment that means God doesn’t hold all life precious, because He does, and that is why He has declared murder to be one of the top sins. Many, if not all, of the nations who God had Israel wipe out sacrificed/murdered their children on altars (like how abortionists sacrifice their babies on the altar of sexual pleasure these days). God considered this cultural norm of theirs very evil, and worthy of death: cutting off the whole family or tribe so as not to pollute others. Seems to me, and I haven't catalogued it, that whenever God told Israel He was going to use them as His agent in executing judgement, He typically told them why they were being cut off from the living. If you say you want evil to end, but you don't have the ability to reform any and all evil-doers, through free-will, then who are you to judge God who does know, even the hearts and intentions of people and thus who needs to be cut off, and why, and when it will do the most good, for the greater majority, for the purpose of teaching us and the rest of eternity that choices have consequences.

Furthermore, it is written: “Jesus summoned them, saying, "Allow the little children to come to me, and don't hinder them, for the Kingdom of God belongs to such as these.” Luke 18:16. Did you know that God doesn’t condemn anyone to eternal death who has not committed sin? And children who don’t know or understand are not accountable, and thus do not have the judgment of death hanging over them? That means that cutting off a family line, would be a merciful act from the ultimate perspective of a child who would have followed in the sins of the family...

“3As I live, says the Lord Yahweh... 4Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul who sins, he shall die... 20The soul who sins, he shall die: the son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son; the righteousness of the righteous shall be on him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be on him.” Ezekiel 18:3-4,20

“Bearing” the iniquity of the fathers is not the same as “visiting” the iniquity of the fathers on the children. It is an observable fact that children emulate their parents, and when they grow to adulthood, they either choose to be like their parents in attitude, or, in some cases, consciously choose not to be like their parents.

So, you first need to prove that you know, better than God, what the ultimate state of the peoples He had destroyed would be, that it could be proven they could have been reformed by less drastic means, before you can stand in judgement of His actions. And, failing that, you also have to stand in judgement of the people He condemned, to prove they did nothing worthy of death. And finally, you need to consider that when God created mankind, He gave Adam a commandment not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil lest he would die. And of course he did eat and brought death upon mankind. So, in order to condemn God, you will first have to prove that God is unjust for imposing commandments on people regarding what constitutes moral behavior and what doesn’t. But it doesn't end there, because then you will also have to know, ultimately, who only died in the flesh in this world (which the bible likens to sleep) but will live again in the resurrection; because the story isn't over yet.

I’m sorry, you seem sincere in your beliefs but
I see the usual intellectual contortions to explain away that being born gay is a false precept and that one may simply “choose” not to participate in such “sin” and everything will be just fine. And what is the “evil” of “this way”? What two consenting adults do in private is our business?

“The Old Covenant period showed us, not only God’s capacity and ability for destroying evil, but also what things constitute evil, including the corrupting of His ways by His own people who, of all people, should know better.”

So, in the case of Sodom and Gomorrah God
had a hissy fit because of some impure behavior of some in the villages so he destroyed everyone, men, women, children,
goats, chickens and goldfish?

Seems harsh for a loving God. And what of the lesson? Did humans come into line after that? Did the example work for others?
Not so much apparently but I’m sure you will have a slick explanation for that too,

There is no actual medical or scientific proof that homosexuals are in fact "born that way". And there have been dozens of studies done, (many initiated by homosexuals in the hope of proving such to be true.) In 1972 when the APA removed homosexuality from their diagnostic manual as a mental disorder there were so many psychiatrists who were outraged that they insisted, and got a referendum to put it right back in. The final vote in 1973 was 40% to reinstate homosexuality as a mental disorder, 60% to remove. But several of the psychiatrists came forward and revealed there was NO scientific or medical reason for removing homosexuality as a mental disorder. It was removed because of intense political pressure and because militant homosexuals were picketing the psychiatrist's homes and threatening their families.

What is this "practice" of a religion? Being able to refuse people's rights or interject your religious beliefs on another stops right there. If you own a company you have no say in anything to do with your employees religion or beliefs. If you were to get so upset at an employee who gets an abortion you would have no right to give them any crap or fire them because they did something that went against your beliefs.

Your religious beliefs are yours, nobody else even needs to know what they are let alone saying they have anything to do with affecting someone else. The word participate was used, they were being forced to participate, selling flowers is not participating. Participate would be perhaps showing up at the church or venue and having to do flower arrangements, which they could refuse.