debeda wrote:
AGREED. Except about Bootygig - you really think he has a shot? Does his gayness cancel out his white privilege?
If it does, he can quickly change his story and claim he is actually a transgendered lesbian who by the way is one third Cherokee and a quarter black.
That'd make him a shoo-in for the nomination. 😁
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Ya forgot Muslim.
Well, they have the "Jews for Jesus," so he could claim to be a "Christian for Mohammed."
America 1 wrote:
Pelosi is worried about the tromping they will get in coming elections if they impeach.
There is enough to impeach but the people ant aware of it yet people are busy with heir lives. She is smart enough to know the people need to see the all the facts and she says we are not quite there yet but the net is closing slowly but surely. The subpoenas will show the full story of the Trump crime family
[quote=Pennylynn]Mike,
This may be the best solution, if the house votes to impeach then they will have to shut up and start doing their jobs. Keep in mind that impeachment does not remove him from office. It is embarrassing, but remember Clinton was impeached and went on to win a second term.
They can do their jobs, but it's a waste of time. Mitch said he would not allow any legislation proposed by the House to be heard by the Senate.
Pennylynn wrote:
If it is left to Pelosi, then no. I have been listening to her, as painful as it is to take time to have her stumble through, it seems unlikely that it will happen. I am trying to figure out why she is opposed..... perhaps she knows that she will not have the support once it reaches the Senate? Would this then guarantee President Trump's reelection? And if they do not impeach, with his popularity going up, will he win anyway?
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/20/nancy-pelosi-impeachment-1336587"House Democratic leaders sparred internally on Monday over whether to begin an impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump, with Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her allies rejecting the call to move forward for now, according to multiple sources.
Reps. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), and Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) — all members of the Democratic leadership — pushed to begin impeachment proceedings during a leadership meeting in Pelosi's office, said the sources. Pelosi and Reps. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), Ben Ray Lujan (D-N.M.), Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) and Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.) — some of her key allies — rejected their calls, saying Democrats' message is being drowned out by the fight over possibly impeaching Trump.
Raskin — a former law professor — said he wasn't advocating impeaching Trump but suggested that opening an impeachment inquiry would strengthen their legal position while allowing Democrats to move forward with their legislative agenda."
Follow the link for the entire article.
If it is left to Pelosi, then no. I have been lis... (
show quote)
The Democrats are between a rock and a mill stone.
They lose either way.
Fighting against a successful economy, is a hard rock to break.
Fighting for a successful invasion is a loser also.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.