God is not one with everything. God is separate and apart from His creation.

It is pantheism, which maintains that "God is all, and all is God."

Pantheism is the view that God is everything and everyone and that everyone and everything is God. Pantheism is similar to polytheism (the belief in many gods), but goes beyond polytheism to teach that everything is God. A tree is God, a rock is God, an animal is God, the sky is God, the sun is God, you are God, etc. Pantheism is the supposition behind many cults and false religions (e.g., Hinduism and Buddhism to an extent, the various unity and unification cults, and “mother nature” worshipers).

Does the Bible teach pantheism? No, it does not. What many people confuse as pantheism is the doctrine of God’s omnipresence. Psalm 139:7-8 declares, “Where can I go from your Spirit? Where can I flee from your presence? If I go up to the heavens, you are there; if I make my bed in the depths, you are there.” God’s omnipresence means He is present everywhere. There is no place in the universe where God is not present. This is not the same thing as pantheism. God is everywhere, but He is not everything. Yes, God is “present” inside a tree and inside a person, but that does not make that tree or person God. Pantheism is not at all a biblical belief.

The clearest biblical arguments against pantheism are the countless commands against idolatry. The Bible forbids the worship of idols, angels, celestial objects, items in nature, etc. If pantheism were true, it would not be wrong to worship such an object, because that object would, in fact, be God. If pantheism were true, worshiping a rock or an animal would have just as much validity as worshiping God as an invisible and spiritual being. The Bible’s clear and consistent denunciation of idolatry is a conclusive argument against pantheism.

The Bible presents God as holy (Isaiah 6:3; Revelation 4:8), sovereign (1 Chronicles 29:11; Nehemiah 9:6; Psalm 83:18; Isaiah 37:20), omnipresent (Psalm 139:7-10), omniscient (Job 28:24; Psalm 147:4-5), omnipotent (Job 42:1-2), self-existent (Exodus 3:14; Psalm 36:9), eternal (Psalm 90:2; Habakkuk 1:12), immutable (Psalm 33:11; James 1:17), perfect (Deuteronomy 32:3-4), and infinite (Job 5:9; 9:10). None of these attributes are compatible with pantheism. God transcends all of His creation, and is in no sense limited or changed by events in His Creation.


Jesus Among Other gods by Ravi Zacharias.

Whose opinion do you argue in a debate, dtucker?

Your great uncles? Einsteins? You 3rd cousins - twice removed?

Those with no opinion don't engage in debating in a forum.

The very existence of God is argued here continually, yet the theory of Evolution is an unarguable "Universal truth," where no one can detour from the much traveled road of brainwashed public opinion?

Your conclusion defies reason and common sense.

I added a full page of factual historical documented information on the life of Charles Darwin.

You, on the other hand, have added fury, smoke and mirrors.

Railing at me doesn't change that.

To everyone on OPP.
Earlier I stated to Zemirah that I was not going to respond to any more of her stupidiotic questions, from here on out, on this thread. She is trying to goad me into responding to her ludicrous and trivial pronouncements. One of the most facetious statements I have ever read on OPP is the one below where she tries to put words in my mouth, words I have never uttered. This is the most reprehensible and interminable means of trying to control a debate through disingenuous tactics: She resorts to ad hominem attacks against anyone who disagrees with her and charges that these people have been brainwashed. Here is what Zemirah says;

"The very existence of God is argued here continually, yet the theory of Evolution is an unarguable "Universal truth," where no one can detour from the much-traveled road of brainwashed public opinion?"

First, this thread has not been about the existence of God. Nevertheless, this cannot be proven, nor can it be proven that God doesn't exist. To think otherwise is unenlightened lunacy regardless of what the Bible may say.

However, my focus is on Zemirah's statement, "...yet the Theory of Evolution is an unarguable 'Universal Truth.'"
Here is where Zemirah's defies logic and reason with this statement. A 'theory" is a proposed explanation whose status is still conjecture [that is without sufficient evidence of proof]. Darwin's Theory of Evolution hardly qualifies as a Universal Truth! Many people deny different aspects of Darwin's Theory because there are many things, well-documented, that Darwin got wrong. Now she will claim that she is only exposing my opinion about Universal Truths.

Zemirah only has tremendous disdain for the intellect of anyone who disagrees. The absurdity of her premises never leads to syllogistic reasoning and the outcome is denigrating and disparaging vindictiveness. She does not act in what I would call a Christian-like manner, which makes me question her sincerity when she makes any claim of her own about God.

To everyone on OPP.
Earlier I stated to Zemirah that I was not going to respond to any more of her stupidiotic questions, from here on out, on this thread. She is trying to goad me into responding to her ludicrous and trivial pronouncements. One of the most facetious statements I have ever read on OPP is the one below where she tries to put words in my mouth, words I have never uttered. This is the most reprehensible and interminable means of trying to control a debate through disingenuous tactics: She resorts to ad hominem attacks against anyone who disagrees with her and charges that these people have been brainwashed. Here is what Zemirah says;

"The very existence of God is argued here continually, yet the theory of Evolution is an unarguable "Universal truth," where no one can detour from the much-traveled road of brainwashed public opinion?"

First, this thread has not been about the existence of God. Nevertheless, this cannot be proven, nor can it be proven that God doesn't exist. To think otherwise is unenlightened lunacy regardless of what the Bible may say.

However, my focus is on Zemirah's statement, "...yet the Theory of Evolution is an unarguable 'Universal Truth.'"
Here is where Zemirah's defies logic and reason with this statement. A 'theory" is a proposed explanation whose status is still conjecture [that is without sufficient evidence of proof]. Darwin's Theory of Evolution hardly qualifies as a Universal Truth! Many people deny different aspects of Darwin's Theory because there are many things, well-documented, that Darwin got wrong. Now she will claim that she is only exposing my opinion about Universal Truths.

Zemirah only has tremendous disdain for the intellect of anyone who disagrees. The absurdity of her premises never leads to syllogistic reasoning and the outcome is denigrating and disparaging vindictiveness. She does not act in what I would call a Christian-like manner, which makes me question her sincerity when she makes any claim of her own about God.

To everyone on OPP.
Earlier I stated to Zemirah that I was not going to respond to any more of her stupidiotic questions, from here on out, on this thread. She is trying to goad me into responding to her ludicrous and trivial pronouncements. One of the most facetious statements I have ever read on OPP is the one below where she tries to put words in my mouth, words I have never uttered. This is the most reprehensible and interminable means of trying to control a debate through disingenuous tactics: She resorts to ad hominem attacks against anyone who disagrees with her and charges that these people have been brainwashed. Here is what Zemirah says;

"The very existence of God is argued here continually, yet the theory of Evolution is an unarguable "Universal truth," where no one can detour from the much-traveled road of brainwashed public opinion?"

First, this thread has not been about the existence of God. Nevertheless, this cannot be proven, nor can it be proven that God doesn't exist. To think otherwise is unenlightened lunacy regardless of what the Bible may say.

However, my focus is on Zemirah's statement, "...yet the Theory of Evolution is an unarguable 'Universal Truth.'"
Here is where Zemirah's defies logic and reason with this statement. A 'theory" is a proposed explanation whose status is still conjecture [that is without sufficient evidence of proof]. Darwin's Theory of Evolution hardly qualifies as a Universal Truth! Many people deny different aspects of Darwin's Theory because there are many things, well-documented, that Darwin got wrong. Now she will claim that she is only exposing my opinion about Universal Truths.

Zemirah only has tremendous disdain for the intellect of anyone who disagrees. The absurdity of her premises never leads to syllogistic reasoning and the outcome is denigrating and disparaging vindictiveness. She does not act in what I would call a Christian-like manner, which makes me question her sincerity when she makes any claim of her own about God.

To everyone on OPP.
Earlier I stated to Zemirah that I was not going to respond to any more of her stupidiotic questions, from here on out, on this thread. She is trying to goad me into responding to her ludicrous and trivial pronouncements. One of the most facetious statements I have ever read on OPP is the one below where she tries to put words in my mouth, words I have never uttered. This is the most reprehensible and interminable means of trying to control a debate through disingenuous tactics: She resorts to ad hominem attacks against anyone who disagrees with her and charges that these people have been brainwashed. Here is what Zemirah says;

"The very existence of God is argued here continually, yet the theory of Evolution is an unarguable "Universal truth," where no one can detour from the much-traveled road of brainwashed public opinion?"

First, this thread has not been about the existence of God. Nevertheless, this cannot be proven, nor can it be proven that God doesn't exist. To think otherwise is unenlightened lunacy regardless of what the Bible may say.

However, my focus is on Zemirah's statement, "...yet the Theory of Evolution is an unarguable 'Universal Truth.'"
Here is where Zemirah's defies logic and reason with this statement. A 'theory" is a proposed explanation whose status is still conjecture [that is without sufficient evidence of proof]. Darwin's Theory of Evolution hardly qualifies as a Universal Truth! Many people deny different aspects of Darwin's Theory because there are many things, well-documented, that Darwin got wrong. Now she will claim that she is only exposing my opinion about Universal Truths.

Zemirah only has tremendous disdain for the intellect of anyone who disagrees. The absurdity of her premises never leads to syllogistic reasoning and the outcome is denigrating and disparaging vindictiveness. She does not act in what I would call a Christian-like manner, which makes me question her sincerity when she makes any claim of her own about God.