Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas

Not an Admiral, either.

Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana

You think you have never hallucinated. That's because you live in a contineuos hallucinating world so you think that's normal.

Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas

Yeah, right. You were obviously hallucinating when you wrote the word "contineous" (sic).

That's obviously a very intelligent statement. And I'm sure one you can back up with scientific proof. :D

Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana

So, I can't spell correctly. That doesn't change the fact that you are living in a hallucinating world.

saloopo Loc: Colorado

Im not interested in 177 of your convict friends in Minnesota. Im saying you are a fraud. Youre leading the discussion of Voter ID into one of 'YOU CANT PROVE FRAUD' (therefore VOTER ID LAWS ARE NOT RELEVANT). That was my comment to Loki. Voter ID. I made reference to Voter ID six times in my comment. You found reason to reply in the usual demeaning and insulting manner to my statement and yet somehow, in that vulgar reply, you never once found it necessary to mention the subject of my comment, VOTER ID. Not one mention of Voter ID? Evading the issue again? Changing the subject again? I think youre afraid of Voter ID, I think youre even afraid to write 'Voter ID' on a piece of paper. Because, as Voter ID becomes the law of the land, you and your friends lose your cheating, money bought, political edge and with it, your power. Thats what youre afraid of and why youre afraid of it and why you refuse to address it.

Loki Loc: Georgia

I'm tired of his crap, but may I point out he studiously ignores one of my sources was US News and World Report, and another was Minnesota Public Radio, neither of which are known as bastions of conservative thought. Both of his sources were left wing publications with a far smaller audience, and not very well known outside of Minnesota. (Or, for that matter, Minneapolis ). Researching the dispositions of 40 cases, many of which may have had voter fraud as a secondary or tertiary charge, requires hours of research, which has already been done by the sources I cited. Doing them again is simply a stupid assed game he wants me to play, wasting time doing paralegal work while he sits on his couch and pulls his pud, or whatever it is he does. My sources are at least as credible as his, he can verify all he wants. I don't work for free, for the entertainment of a deliberately obtuse clown with an overgrown ego and an undergrown brain. The sources are there. He can look them up himself.

Peaver Bogart Loc: Montana

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

You just can't argue with liberals!!!give fact and documentation, they give you msnbc, or scientific evidence from discredited scientist.
Example: Fact- the earth has been warming for 300 years, 150 pre industrialization. Fact- ummm that's 150 years prior to any man made industrialized anything.
Fact- the planet has not warmed the last 15 years, but the liberal scientist with an agenda, keep quoting the last 30 years. That's the discredited scientist.
Fact- co2 is not pollution, yet writers will have a picture of factories bellowing smoke/steam a with emotion state how we are being polluted with co2 emissions.
Fact- scientific evidence proves that the earth has experienced multiple cycles of much higher co2 over the eons.
Fact-trees and plant life love co2, increased green gobaly and increased farming production.
Fact- there is not 1 (one) scientific study proving man made global warming!!!!! None!!!!!!

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

Why have 46 states prosecuted voter fraud, if there isn't voter fraud?

jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho

I believe both republicans and democrats put themselves in the best possible light. The conservative frustration is the path democrats have paved for transforming our great nation by socialistic/communistic means, trampling the constitution and foundation of what was intended by the founding fathers.
Democrats have won, God help us from the judgment they have brought upon America!!
Currently, and especially the last 6 years..... Shame on Republicans and
Democrats ,for both parties are damaging our nation.
People on the blog can attack one another and name call, when we should be agreeing the US is in very deep trouble! Can we not move on to how to fix and support one another on the few ideologies we do agree on?

Bruce Kennedy Loc: Kansas

You're right about one thing, you are tired. Just the same old evasion. Your source, US World and News Report, did not investigate "voter fraud" in the Minnesota 2008 Senatorial election they merely reported what was written in the WSJ, by John Fund. And a study done by the "Minnesota Majority", a "Conservative watchdog" group,(their words, not mine). But here's the real kicker about your US World and News article it was on the "OPINION" page. They don't even try to make it look like its authentic investigating journalism. That's because it's not, it's an OpEd piece, by Peter Roff. The article is written on the OPINION page of the US News and World Report.

Look continue to evade, stall and lie, but it's evident you can't even prove there was even one "voter fraud" conviction case, in the 2008 Minnesota Senatorial election. Listen to this BS you're spouting....

"Researching the dispositions of 40 cases, many of which may have had voter fraud as a secondary or tertiary charge, requires hours of research..."

This is just some of your deflecting BS. Even your own quote says..."many of which 'MAY' have had "voter fraud"... Hell not even your own source can confirm there was "voter fraud", let alone "voter fraud" convictions. And your moaning about having to do all this tedious researching is merely a smoke screen. You don't have to do any of this BS research, to prove that there were 177 cases of "voter fraud" convictions, that has already been done for you. So quit making it sound like you have to research it, all over again. All you have to do is show me 40 cases of "voter fraud" convictions. You can't do that because there aren't 40 cases of "voter fraud" convictions. They don't exist. And don't go dippy on me, you know I'm referring to the so-called convictions that come out of the 2008 Minnesota Senatorial race. Trying to discredit the sources I used with an OpEd piece is laughable. PROVE ME WRONG, show me 40 cases of "voter fraud" convictions stemming from the 2008 Minnesota Senatorial election. Quit the stalling, I've already proved one of the names provided by the Minnesota Majority to be a bogus lie.

Liberty Tree

No proof would ever be enough for him because he is a fraud.

Loki Loc: Georgia

He is almost to the point of Pavlovian response now. The same thing over and over again. Like a dog with a bone he is very fond of, he won't let go. It's not much of a bone, but it's his bone. How long do you think before he posts more of his predictable bullshit? If he keeps doing the Pavlov thing, I may have to invest in some dog biscuits.

Liberty Tree

It is not even his bone. It is just one he has been tossed through DNC talking points.

Loki Loc: Georgia

I suppose. I do believe I will eat and go to bed. I am tired.