Pennylynn wrote:
Oh dear.... your feeling are hurt.... poor darling. So.... should you have read the report for yourself and draw your own conclusions and observations? Just my opinion, but I think the report was too limited in how many people they tracked. Had they expanded their base they would have clearly come out with a pattern..... being that people who do not live in cities are more apt to use the programs as a hand up rather than an expectation of entitlements. Also, had they limited their base to cities they would have found that hispanics in California and along the border are far more apt to receive welfare. And had they limited the base to the North East, they would have seen that blacks are the overwhelming participates in the programs. Had they focused on the rust belt, they would have seen that white women dominate the statistics. The report had faults, but taking it with those limitations in mind, the report gave a fairly good understanding where the welfare dollars are spent. Huff however made the issue into a point of them vs us, another point put out just to divide our nation. And you built on this devision by not reading the report and drawing your conclusions. As I said.... numbers do not lie. Adding in your characterization of my opinion as a "trumpian spin" does not help your argument.
Oh dear.... your feeling are hurt.... poor darling... (
show quote)
Droll on, pussycat. No Fancy Treats for you.