It’s time to stop the climate change debate.
Mar 13, 2019 20:46:10 #
bdamage wrote:
The only ones who don't have a job right now or those who do not want to work.
Not necessarily true. Though there are more jobs than applicants, they are not evenly distributed. If someone lives where jobs are few but cannot move to where jobs are plentiful, they might not find a job yet it won't be because they don't want to work. Sweeping statements are rarely accurate.
Mar 13, 2019 21:07:29 #
JoyV wrote:
Not necessarily true. Though there are more jobs than applicants, they are not evenly distributed. If someone lives where jobs are few but cannot move to where jobs are plentiful, they might not find a job yet it won't be because they don't want to work. Sweeping statements are rarely accurate.
Where I live if you're not working but are able to then you don't want to work.
Mar 13, 2019 23:20:04 #
JoyV wrote:
That is why it is better to look at employment figures instead of unemployment.
I agree.
Mar 13, 2019 23:23:00 #
bdamage wrote:
Where I live if you're not working but are able to then you don't want to work.
That may be the case where you live, it isn't the case everywhere. Of course I wouldn't know about my area as I am not in need of a new job at this time, perhaps if business slows...
Mar 14, 2019 01:08:24 #
bdamage wrote:
The only ones who don't have a job right now or those who do not want to work.
That's not really true. Economists call our current economy, with 3 to 4 percent unemployment rates,"full employment". Unemployment will never be zero. There will always be people between jobs; and more importantly, there will always be people who do not have the skills needed for the jobs that are available. This is a "jobs mismatch". Employers cannot find qualified workers for many jobs that are available, and workers can't find jobs that require their limited skills. When employers get desperate, they offer on-the-job training for workers who look promising.
Mar 15, 2019 14:59:55 #
EconomistDon wrote:
That's not really true. Economists call our curre... (show quote)
More good points.
Mar 15, 2019 21:56:40 #
It amazes me with the right wing we start a topic on stop the climate change debate and it turns into jobs. Why is it the right constantly flips and get into a totally different topic.
Mar 15, 2019 22:57:19 #
Airforceone wrote:
It amazes me with the right wing we start a topic on stop the climate change debate and it turns into jobs. Why is it the right constantly flips and get into a totally different topic.
It's a FORUM, man. lighten up.
Opinions on a forum differ...conversations morph... or did you forget that you said you would be open to differing opinions?
Mar 16, 2019 11:32:19 #
EmilyD wrote:
It's a FORUM, man. lighten up.
Opinions on a forum differ...conversations morph... or did you forget that you said you would be open to differing opinions?
Opinions on a forum differ...conversations morph... or did you forget that you said you would be open to differing opinions?
"It's a FORUM, man. lighten up."
It can get hot in the kitchen. LOLOLOL
So God made a liberal.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/EUzMPlQb2G4
Mar 17, 2019 08:12:49 #
EconomistDon wrote:
That's not really true. Economists call our curre... (show quote)
There are one million more jobs that there are unemployed.
Just sayin'.
Not that what you have mentioned isn't true in some circumstances, but there are those who prefer to collect their "wages" and food for free from the tax-payers than to have to actually work.
Then there are those who were able to get jobs and off the gov dole to provide a living wage for their families.
Welfare and food stamp recipients are at an eight year low.
Mar 17, 2019 08:14:33 #
Airforceone wrote:
It amazes me with the right wing we start a topic on stop the climate change debate and it turns into jobs. Why is it the right constantly flips and get into a totally different topic.
Well there nesty, it's because how does one actually "debate" weather?
Mar 17, 2019 09:44:11 #
bdamage wrote:
Well there nesty, it's because how does one actually "debate" weather?
Sooooo; lets dance!!!
Its St’ Paddy’s day!
https://youtu.be/FoHlrQScWl0
Mar 18, 2019 09:30:35 #
Yes time to stop the climate change debate~~ lets call it racism now~~lololl
Good Lord how can our “esteemed scientist” make findings such as this with a straight face???
A good chuckle to start your day~~~
Proving once again that American taxpayers have been way too generous for our own good, the National Academy of Sciences has discovered that the air is racist. If you think that’s too stupid to be true and you’re waiting for the punchline… there’s no punchline. They really mean it. Liberal scientists have determined that the air itself is racist.
According to USA Today and NPR – those two bastions of scientific innovation – the scientists practically stumbled on this new discovery by accident. Perhaps they were looking for those “racist dog whistles” that only liberals can hear and ended up finding a completely different invisible source of racism. A microaggression, if you will.
“Pollution is disproportionately caused by whites, but disproportionately inhaled by black and Hispanic minorities,” say the totally neutral scientists who don’t have a political ax to grind. Let’s see if we can unpack this hot new theory that has all the girls at CNN excited.
White people cause racist air by committing racist sins against the planet, mainly by doing racist things such as “creating electricity.” Then, according to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-MN), the Jews cause the wind to blow all of the pollution from the racist power plants into black and Hispanic neighborhoods, where they are forced to breathe the racist air. Science!
Scientist Jason Hill adds, “What is especially surprising is just how large pollution inequity is and has been for well over a decade.”
So… it started right around when Obama came into office? Good to know.
“Pollution inequity” is a great new fake liberal science term that I’ll have to add to my lexicon. It comes after “Cisgender Heteronormative Fascism” and “Global Warming” alphabetically.
Using the same accounting tricks that brought us the Green New Deal, pollution inequity means that white people experience 17% less air pollution than they produce through electricity consumption. Stop laughing, this is science!
https://www.freedomnewsreport.com/2019/03/14/oh-great-now-the-air-is-racist-according-to-liberals/
Good Lord how can our “esteemed scientist” make findings such as this with a straight face???
A good chuckle to start your day~~~
Proving once again that American taxpayers have been way too generous for our own good, the National Academy of Sciences has discovered that the air is racist. If you think that’s too stupid to be true and you’re waiting for the punchline… there’s no punchline. They really mean it. Liberal scientists have determined that the air itself is racist.
According to USA Today and NPR – those two bastions of scientific innovation – the scientists practically stumbled on this new discovery by accident. Perhaps they were looking for those “racist dog whistles” that only liberals can hear and ended up finding a completely different invisible source of racism. A microaggression, if you will.
“Pollution is disproportionately caused by whites, but disproportionately inhaled by black and Hispanic minorities,” say the totally neutral scientists who don’t have a political ax to grind. Let’s see if we can unpack this hot new theory that has all the girls at CNN excited.
White people cause racist air by committing racist sins against the planet, mainly by doing racist things such as “creating electricity.” Then, according to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-MN), the Jews cause the wind to blow all of the pollution from the racist power plants into black and Hispanic neighborhoods, where they are forced to breathe the racist air. Science!
Scientist Jason Hill adds, “What is especially surprising is just how large pollution inequity is and has been for well over a decade.”
So… it started right around when Obama came into office? Good to know.
“Pollution inequity” is a great new fake liberal science term that I’ll have to add to my lexicon. It comes after “Cisgender Heteronormative Fascism” and “Global Warming” alphabetically.
Using the same accounting tricks that brought us the Green New Deal, pollution inequity means that white people experience 17% less air pollution than they produce through electricity consumption. Stop laughing, this is science!
https://www.freedomnewsreport.com/2019/03/14/oh-great-now-the-air-is-racist-according-to-liberals/
Mar 18, 2019 09:46:33 #
lindajoy wrote:
Yes time to stop the climate change debate~~ lets ... (show quote)
Good find, LJ;
Oh, Great, Now the Air is Racist According to Liberals
https://www.freedomnewsreport.com/2019/03/14/oh-great-now-the-air-is-racist-according-to-liberals/
Mar 18, 2019 09:48:03 #
eagleye13 wrote:
Good find, LJ;
Oh, Great, Now the Air is Racist According to Liberals
https://www.freedomnewsreport.com/2019/03/14/oh-great-now-the-air-is-racist-according-to-liberals/
Oh, Great, Now the Air is Racist According to Liberals
https://www.freedomnewsreport.com/2019/03/14/oh-great-now-the-air-is-racist-according-to-liberals/
Thank You, eagle.... I can not believe the garbage they put out!! They truly think we are stupid!!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.