I find it incredibly ironic that those who applauded the impeachment of Bill Clinton because he lied about having sex with an intern...think that Mueller is operating outside of his mandate. When we look at Witch Hunts your use of Ken Star to hound Bill Clinton for the full of his 8 years and was finally able to nail him for perjury for lying about having sex with "that woman, Monica Lewinsky." At least with Trump, there is "there," there because we have known Russian interference in our presidential election for the purpose of tipping the scales in the favor of Donald J Trump. An effort, which combined with everything else seems to have worked. Combine that with the fact that 17 Trump associates lied about having contact with the Russia government or WikiLeaks just prior to their release of embarrassing documents on Hillary Clinton and there you have the foundation for the Mueller probe.

I know you think we were supposed to shrug our shoulders and look the other way but I can see maybe one or two lying but EVERY associate for DJT who had contacts with Russia or WikiLeaks lied when questioned on Russia! If there is to be an investigation that is the reason why and if the shoe was on the other foot you damn well would find someone far worse that Mueller to carry out your task.

As for Levin--he is full of Bullshit!!! Mueller can be fired by his superiors. Right there tells you his position is inferior. Whether he is outside of his mandate is a completely different story and doesn't relate to his position in the government. And once again--what you are saying is that the legal representation for DJT doesn't know what they are doing by not challenging the validity of Mueller's appointment. If Mueller's appointment was invalid, even the most incompetent of lawyers, which Trump no doubt has, would be smart enough to challenge that.

That there was no challenge tell you that they think Mueller's appointment valid. Your constitutional scholar should be able to know that but clearly, that fact escapes him. And once again you are on your fallacy merry-go-round using an 'appeal to authority' as a reason to believe something true. That someone claims to be an expert is no reason not to challenge them and especially in this case where the rules are easy to understand--if an appointment can be fired by a higher up other than the president means their position is inferior and therefore there is no need for a Presidential appointment.

Your man crush on Levin aside he is using his position to give you false information

I find it incredibly ironic that those who applauded the impeachment of Bill Clinton because he lied about having sex with an intern...think that Mueller is operating outside of his mandate. When we look at Witch Hunts your use of Ken Star to hound Bill Clinton for the full of his 8 years and was finally able to nail him for perjury for lying about having sex with "that woman, Monica Lewinsky." At least with Trump, there is "there," there because we have known Russian interference in our presidential election for the purpose of tipping the scales in the favor of Donald J Trump. An effort, which combined with everything else seems to have worked. Combine that with the fact that 17 Trump associates lied about having contact with the Russia government or WikiLeaks just prior to their release of embarrassing documents on Hillary Clinton and there you have the foundation for the Mueller probe.

I know you think we were supposed to shrug our shoulders and look the other way but I can see maybe one or two lying but EVERY associate for DJT who had contacts with Russia or WikiLeaks lied when questioned on Russia! If there is to be an investigation that is the reason why and if the shoe was on the other foot you damn well would find someone far worse that Mueller to carry out your task.

As for Levin--he is full of Bullshit!!! Mueller can be fired by his superiors. Right there tells you his position is inferior. Whether he is outside of his mandate is a completely different story and doesn't relate to his position in the government. And once again--what you are saying is that the legal representation for DJT doesn't know what they are doing by not challenging the validity of Mueller's appointment. If Mueller's appointment was invalid, even the most incompetent of lawyers, which Trump no doubt has, would be smart enough to challenge that.

That there was no challenge tell you that they think Mueller's appointment valid. Your constitutional scholar should be able to know that but clearly, that fact escapes him. And once again you are on your fallacy merry-go-round using an 'appeal to authority' as a reason to believe something true. That someone claims to be an expert is no reason not to challenge them and especially in this case where the rules are easy to understand--if an appointment can be fired by a higher up other than the president means their position is inferior and therefore there is no need for a Presidential appointment.

Your man crush on Levin aside he is using his position to give you false information

Can anyone here refute what Mark Levin is saying in this video? If you can please don't try and use any type of Euphemisms or what about so and so. I'm asking for all here on OPP to just use their own sense of right and wrong and good Ole common sense. Because if there ever is a Democrat president in the future what the heck would that mean for our country if you get my drift. If this is what the Democrat party has turned into than I hope THAT OUR COUNTRY NEVER EVER HAS A DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT IN TIS COUNTRY!!!!! I mean that with all my heart and mind. The way the Democrat party has gone since JFK is no longer recognizable in the slightest.
Semper Fi
Mike

https://youtu.be/QGNZWECfmuM