One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
MR. Mark Levin Speaks T***h
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 10, 2019 03:31:28   #
2bltap Loc: Move to the Mainland
 
Can anyone here refute what Mark Levin is saying in this video? If you can please don't try and use any type of Euphemisms or what about so and so. I'm asking for all here on OPP to just use their own sense of right and wrong and good Ole common sense. Because if there ever is a Democrat president in the future what the heck would that mean for our country if you get my drift. If this is what the Democrat party has turned into than I hope THAT OUR COUNTRY NEVER EVER HAS A DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT IN TIS COUNTRY!!!!! I mean that with all my heart and mind. The way the Democrat party has gone since JFK is no longer recognizable in the slightest.
Semper Fi
Mike

https://youtu.be/QGNZWECfmuM

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 04:02:07   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
2bltap wrote:
Can anyone here refute what Mark Levin is saying in this video? If you can please don't try and use any type of Euphemisms or what about so and so. I'm asking for all here on OPP to just use their own sense of right and wrong and good Ole common sense. Because if there ever is a Democrat president in the future what the heck would that mean for our country if you get my drift. If this is what the Democrat party has turned into than I hope THAT OUR COUNTRY NEVER EVER HAS A DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT IN TIS COUNTRY!!!!! I mean that with all my heart and mind. The way the Democrat party has gone since JFK is no longer recognizable in the slightest.
Semper Fi
Mike

https://youtu.be/QGNZWECfmuM
Can anyone here refute what Mark Levin is saying i... (show quote)
Mark Levin is a national treasure, he is the eminent constitutional scholar and American historian. His accounts of our nation's founding from start to finish are phenomenal.

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 04:18:06   #
PeterS
 
2bltap wrote:
Can anyone here refute what Mark Levin is saying in this video? If you can please don't try and use any type of Euphemisms or what about so and so. I'm asking for all here on OPP to just use their own sense of right and wrong and good Ole common sense. Because if there ever is a Democrat president in the future what the heck would that mean for our country if you get my drift. If this is what the Democrat party has turned into than I hope THAT OUR COUNTRY NEVER EVER HAS A DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT IN TIS COUNTRY!!!!! I mean that with all my heart and mind. The way the Democrat party has gone since JFK is no longer recognizable in the slightest.
Semper Fi
Mike

https://youtu.be/QGNZWECfmuM
Can anyone here refute what Mark Levin is saying i... (show quote)

Telling us that America sucks or what Conservative's are doing to America sucks. The two are not the same?

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2019 04:20:01   #
PeterS
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Mark Levin is a national treasure, he is the eminent constitutional scholar and American historian. His accounts of our nation's founding from start to finish are phenomenal.

A constitutional scholar who doesn't even know what an inferior appointment made by the Deputy Attorney General is. National treasure indeed...

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 05:14:43   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
PeterS wrote:
A constitutional scholar who doesn't even know what an inferior appointment made by the Deputy Attorney General is. National treasure indeed...
Mark Levin served 8 years as Chief of Staff for US Attorney General Ed Meese. I have heard Mark explain in great detail the difference between a principal officer and an inferior one. In fact, just this past week, on his radio show, Levin dev**ed an entire hour to walking us carefully through the Appointments clause in Article II, Section 2 of the constitution, and, as he always does when he talks about the constitution, he went rather deeply into why our founders included an appointments clause in the first place and the debates that finally got it in there. His explanation of the difference between a principal officer and an inferior one was brilliant.

Obviously, what you fail to understand is that, even though Mueller was appointed under the constitutional authority of the Deputy AG, and by that standard is an inferior officer, Mueller immediately assumed authority not granted him through that constitutional process. Rosenstein failed to do his job in supervising Mueller and his investigation, essentially giving him Carte Blanche to do any damned thing he pleases.

If you would actually listen to someone as knowledgeable in the history of our founding as Mark is rather than the chattering h**e monkeys in your skull, you wouldn't make such ignorant comments.

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 07:53:32   #
Richard Rowland
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Mark Levin served 8 years as Chief of Staff for US Attorney General Ed Meese. I have heard Mark explain in great detail the difference between a principal officer and an inferior one. In fact, just this past week, on his radio show, Levin dev**ed an entire hour to walking us carefully through the Appointments clause in Article II, Section 2 of the constitution, and, as he always does when he talks about the constitution, he went rather deeply into why our founders included an appointments clause in the first place and the debates that finally got it in there. His explanation of the difference between a principal officer and an inferior one was brilliant.

Obviously, what you fail to understand is that, even though Mueller was appointed under the constitutional authority of the Deputy AG, and by that standard is an inferior officer, Mueller immediately assumed authority not granted him through that constitutional process. Rosenstein failed to do his job in supervising Mueller and his investigation, essentially giving him Carte Blanche to do any damned thing he pleases.

If you would actually listen to someone as knowledgeable in the history of our founding as Mark is rather than the chattering h**e monkeys in your skull, you wouldn't make such ignorant comments.
Mark Levin served 8 years as Chief of Staff for US... (show quote)


Rosenstine failed to do his job when he appointed Mueller. Had he done his job there would have been no one to supervise. Rosenstine is no dummy, he knew what he was doing when he did it. He's part of the deep state attempting to undermine Trump. Who knows! Perhaps Trump needs to be undermined.

I feel there where candidates more qualified than Donald Trump. If folks wanted someone who stood for what America is supposed to be all about, Rand Paul should have gotten their v**e.

However, common sense tells us that it took a few centuries to get the country this screwed up, and no one person is gonna straighten it out in eight years.

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 09:12:25   #
maximus Loc: Chattanooga, Tennessee
 
PeterS wrote:
Telling us that America sucks or what Conservative's are doing to America sucks. The two are not the same?


Conservatives protect religious freedom, freedom of speech, and high morals in government. This does not suck,as you say.
Speaking of morals, AOC seems to be guilty of money laundering to the tune of $1,000,000, and giving her boyfriend a gov email address that is only permissible to wives and families, of which he is neither. Ilhan Omar is guilty of r****t h**e speech toward Israel on more then one occasion. Another congresswoman, Rashida Tlabi, paid herself $175,000 after the e******n, and after calling Trump a motherf###er, said she would always stand up for what is right. I don't see any morals in any of these 3 women. That sucks, as you say.
Conservatives have brought the country back to the forefront of world politics, have made the economy to explode, have and are trying to protect our Southern border, and, as you say, that does not suck. On the other hand, liberals rejected a reasonable deal ( that years before had already been approved) on the border wall, want the economy to sink back into the slow growth and wage stagnation of before, to the point where we had a government shutdown. During this shutdown, liberals attempted to leave the country for a European vacation, and some of them DID take a vacation in Hawaii. As you say, once again, this really sucks.
It is evident that liberal politicians are making decisions that affect citizens of this nation based only on hatred for a sitting president. That, as you say, really, really.....no, I mean REALLY...sucks.
So, it's not America that sucks, nor is it conservative actions that suck, but it IS those living off of our constitutionally protected rights, those who use lies and gossip, those who bear h**e in their heart while preaching tolearance, those who are against the very freedoms that allow them to try to tear down this country that really...truly...massively...suck.

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2019 09:25:50   #
meridianlesilie Loc: mars
 
2bltap wrote:
Can anyone here refute what Mark Levin is saying in this video? If you can please don't try and use any type of Euphemisms or what about so and so. I'm asking for all here on OPP to just use their own sense of right and wrong and good Ole common sense. Because if there ever is a Democrat president in the future what the heck would that mean for our country if you get my drift. If this is what the Democrat party has turned into than I hope THAT OUR COUNTRY NEVER EVER HAS A DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT IN TIS COUNTRY!!!!! I mean that with all my heart and mind. The way the Democrat party has gone since JFK is no longer recognizable in the slightest.
Semper Fi
Mike

https://youtu.be/QGNZWECfmuM
Can anyone here refute what Mark Levin is saying i... (show quote)


i did not check it out but if we get another dumb one then we might get our goose cooked..like north korea wanting to bomb us that is what i think that will ruin us & more rotten muslims coming here we never need them again !!!!!!

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 09:28:01   #
meridianlesilie Loc: mars
 
2bltap wrote:
Can anyone here refute what Mark Levin is saying in this video? If you can please don't try and use any type of Euphemisms or what about so and so. I'm asking for all here on OPP to just use their own sense of right and wrong and good Ole common sense. Because if there ever is a Democrat president in the future what the heck would that mean for our country if you get my drift. If this is what the Democrat party has turned into than I hope THAT OUR COUNTRY NEVER EVER HAS A DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT IN TIS COUNTRY!!!!! I mean that with all my heart and mind. The way the Democrat party has gone since JFK is no longer recognizable in the slightest.
Semper Fi
Mike

https://youtu.be/QGNZWECfmuM
Can anyone here refute what Mark Levin is saying i... (show quote)


the dumb demon crats are the ones making america suck !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 09:30:16   #
meridianlesilie Loc: mars
 
meridianlesilie wrote:
the dumb demon crats are the ones making america suck !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1


how dumb can they get !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 09:43:24   #
meridianlesilie Loc: mars
 
2bltap wrote:
Can anyone here refute what Mark Levin is saying in this video? If you can please don't try and use any type of Euphemisms or what about so and so. I'm asking for all here on OPP to just use their own sense of right and wrong and good Ole common sense. Because if there ever is a Democrat president in the future what the heck would that mean for our country if you get my drift. If this is what the Democrat party has turned into than I hope THAT OUR COUNTRY NEVER EVER HAS A DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT IN TIS COUNTRY!!!!! I mean that with all my heart and mind. The way the Democrat party has gone since JFK is no longer recognizable in the slightest.
Semper Fi
Mike

https://youtu.be/QGNZWECfmuM
Can anyone here refute what Mark Levin is saying i... (show quote)


here i sent her this if you look but what good will it do but i did it anyway https://www.facebook.com/IlhanMN/

Reply
 
 
Mar 10, 2019 10:07:58   #
waltmoreno
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Mark Levin served 8 years as Chief of Staff for US Attorney General Ed Meese. I have heard Mark explain in great detail the difference between a principal officer and an inferior one. In fact, just this past week, on his radio show, Levin dev**ed an entire hour to walking us carefully through the Appointments clause in Article II, Section 2 of the constitution, and, as he always does when he talks about the constitution, he went rather deeply into why our founders included an appointments clause in the first place and the debates that finally got it in there. His explanation of the difference between a principal officer and an inferior one was brilliant.

Obviously, what you fail to understand is that, even though Mueller was appointed under the constitutional authority of the Deputy AG, and by that standard is an inferior officer, Mueller immediately assumed authority not granted him through that constitutional process. Rosenstein failed to do his job in supervising Mueller and his investigation, essentially giving him Carte Blanche to do any damned thing he pleases.

If you would actually listen to someone as knowledgeable in the history of our founding as Mark is rather than the chattering h**e monkeys in your skull, you wouldn't make such ignorant comments.
Mark Levin served 8 years as Chief of Staff for US... (show quote)


Bingo! PeterS can't help himself. He's grown up leaning hard left and spouts off reliably blame-America-first, l*****t hogwash every time.
Mark Levin is my number one, must hear, radio talk show host daily. A nationally syndicated constitutional scholar, and president of Landmark Legal which has taken and won a number of high profile cases in the SCOTUS and other courts, it's a rare day when I don't tune in to his show to get more pearls of wisdom from The Great One!

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 10:54:59   #
vernon
 
2bltap wrote:
Can anyone here refute what Mark Levin is saying in this video? If you can please don't try and use any type of Euphemisms or what about so and so. I'm asking for all here on OPP to just use their own sense of right and wrong and good Ole common sense. Because if there ever is a Democrat president in the future what the heck would that mean for our country if you get my drift. If this is what the Democrat party has turned into than I hope THAT OUR COUNTRY NEVER EVER HAS A DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT IN TIS COUNTRY!!!!! I mean that with all my heart and mind. The way the Democrat party has gone since JFK is no longer recognizable in the slightest.
Semper Fi
Mike

https://youtu.be/QGNZWECfmuM
Can anyone here refute what Mark Levin is saying i... (show quote)


Its been a long road but it came about with wilson and fdr.But with lbj it took a hard turn left,and has gotten worse with every president except rwr. Now the worst were the bushes and the last bush made
obama possible.

Reply
Mar 10, 2019 11:28:45   #
maryla
 
2bltap wrote:
Can anyone here refute what Mark Levin is saying in this video? If you can please don't try and use any type of Euphemisms or what about so and so. I'm asking for all here on OPP to just use their own sense of right and wrong and good Ole common sense. Because if there ever is a Democrat president in the future what the heck would that mean for our country if you get my drift. If this is what the Democrat party has turned into than I hope THAT OUR COUNTRY NEVER EVER HAS A DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT IN TIS COUNTRY!!!!! I mean that with all my heart and mind. The way the Democrat party has gone since JFK is no longer recognizable in the slightest.
Semper Fi
Mike

https://youtu.be/QGNZWECfmuM
Can anyone here refute what Mark Levin is saying i... (show quote)


Shame on the Dems! And she (Omar) Is even allowed to say this? D********g! The US is not r****t, h********c but this is act of Cowardice...

Reply
Mar 11, 2019 05:03:56   #
PeterS
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Mark Levin served 8 years as Chief of Staff for US Attorney General Ed Meese. I have heard Mark explain in great detail the difference between a principal officer and an inferior one. In fact, just this past week, on his radio show, Levin dev**ed an entire hour to walking us carefully through the Appointments clause in Article II, Section 2 of the constitution, and, as he always does when he talks about the constitution, he went rather deeply into why our founders included an appointments clause in the first place and the debates that finally got it in there. His explanation of the difference between a principal officer and an inferior one was brilliant.

Obviously, what you fail to understand is that, even though Mueller was appointed under the constitutional authority of the Deputy AG, and by that standard is an inferior officer, Mueller immediately assumed authority not granted him through that constitutional process. Rosenstein failed to do his job in supervising Mueller and his investigation, essentially giving him Carte Blanche to do any damned thing he pleases.

If you would actually listen to someone as knowledgeable in the history of our founding as Mark is rather than the chattering h**e monkeys in your skull, you wouldn't make such ignorant comments.
Mark Levin served 8 years as Chief of Staff for US... (show quote)


I find it incredibly ironic that those who applauded the impeachment of Bill Clinton because he lied about having sex with an intern...think that Mueller is operating outside of his mandate. When we look at Witch Hunts your use of Ken Star to hound Bill Clinton for the full of his 8 years and was finally able to nail him for perjury for lying about having sex with "that woman, Monica Lewinsky." At least with Trump, there is "there," there because we have known Russian interference in our p**********l e******n for the purpose of tipping the scales in the favor of Donald J Trump. An effort, which combined with everything else seems to have worked. Combine that with the fact that 17 Trump associates lied about having contact with the Russia government or WikiLeaks just prior to their release of embarrassing documents on Hillary Clinton and there you have the foundation for the Mueller probe.

I know you think we were supposed to shrug our shoulders and look the other way but I can see maybe one or two lying but EVERY associate for DJT who had contacts with Russia or WikiLeaks lied when questioned on Russia! If there is to be an investigation that is the reason why and if the shoe was on the other foot you damn well would find someone far worse that Mueller to carry out your task.

As for Levin--he is full of Bulls**t!!! Mueller can be fired by his superiors. Right there tells you his position is inferior. Whether he is outside of his mandate is a completely different story and doesn't relate to his position in the government. And once again--what you are saying is that the legal representation for DJT doesn't know what they are doing by not challenging the validity of Mueller's appointment. If Mueller's appointment was invalid, even the most incompetent of lawyers, which Trump no doubt has, would be smart enough to challenge that.

That there was no challenge tell you that they think Mueller's appointment valid. Your constitutional scholar should be able to know that but clearly, that fact escapes him. And once again you are on your fallacy merry-go-round using an 'appeal to authority' as a reason to believe something true. That someone claims to be an expert is no reason not to challenge them and especially in this case where the rules are easy to understand--if an appointment can be fired by a higher up other than the president means their position is inferior and therefore there is no need for a P**********l appointment.

Your man crush on Levin aside he is using his position to give you false information

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.