U.S. House approves expanded background checks for gun sales
Mar 2, 2019 08:17:09 #
Rcki wrote:
Absolutely right. We already have background checks. The gunhaters use this lie to keep from calling this bill what it actually is. And that is a National Gun Registry which they would need later for gun confiscations.
That's exactly what they are trying to get. People can't see it. Remember what happened after Katrina? They want to be able to do it on a larger scale
Mar 2, 2019 08:20:35 #
Bad Bob
Loc: Virginia
Rose42 wrote:
That's exactly what they are trying to get. People can't see it. Remember what happened after Katrina? They want to be able to do it on a larger scale
F the 2nd amendment.
Mar 2, 2019 08:34:50 #
Bad Bob wrote:
F the 2nd amendment.
You know, Smedley's right. Maybe schmuck WOULD be a better term, even though I risk offending schmucks everywhere.
Mar 2, 2019 08:48:31 #
Seth wrote:
You know, Smedley's right. Maybe schmuck WOULD be a better term, even though I risk offending schmucks everywhere.
I have a better, more accurate description of boob, but to post it would get it deleted if not me banned from OPP.
Mar 2, 2019 08:55:44 #
buffalo wrote:
I have a better, more accurate description of boob, but to post it would get it deleted if not me banned from OPP.
There was a line in an old Bob Dylan song,
"...and if my thought/dreams could be seen
they'd probably put my head in a guillotine..."
Mar 2, 2019 09:02:09 #
Seth wrote:
There was a line in an old Bob Dylan song,
"...and if my thought/dreams could be seen
they'd probably put my head in a guillotine..."
"...and if my thought/dreams could be seen
they'd probably put my head in a guillotine..."
Oops, that is what boob would do!Mar 2, 2019 09:05:54 #
Mar 2, 2019 09:25:29 #
Mar 2, 2019 09:38:35 #
Bad Bob
Loc: Virginia
buffalo wrote:
I have a better, more accurate description of boob, but to post it would get it deleted if not me banned from OPP.
Cluck cluck cluck.
Mar 2, 2019 10:22:09 #
Bad Bob wrote:
Cluck cluck cluck.
Cluck cluck cluck.
So, Bad Bob, how long have you had this fantasy that you are a pink chicken? Does it cause you any problems with restroom access?
Mar 2, 2019 10:40:47 #
Seth wrote:
And true.
If you want to talk pathetic, look at yourself. Your posts reveal that you are a pathetic excuse for an American, assuming you even reside in the U.S.
If you want to talk pathetic, look at yourself. Your posts reveal that you are a pathetic excuse for an American, assuming you even reside in the U.S.
Um what you spew is what you are.
Mar 2, 2019 10:52:03 #
Jean Deaux wrote:
Touch off a .50 caliber front stuffer and you'll have a cloud of smoke so distinctive a silencer would do no good for concealment of the source of the round ball. They also have a relatively short range but at close range they do have tremendous penetration power with the right charge of powder. And we won the Revolutionary War using them since our Kentucky Long Rifles were far superior to the British Brown Bess.
You listen as well as Tucker, once again, not talking about outdated muskets, personally a silencer on any gun like that makes no sense, why, to what end? I'm not convinced it's possible with rapid firing weapons.
Mar 2, 2019 10:59:06 #
Seth wrote:
You know, Smedley's right. Maybe schmuck WOULD be a better term, even though I risk offending schmucks everywhere.
Including yourself...
Mar 2, 2019 11:11:37 #
Morgan wrote:
Including yourself...
I think you have me confused with one of your anti-America, pro-Maduro/pro-Marx/socialist-faschist-Ocasio Cortez-baby murder cheerleading, treasonous ilk.
Mar 2, 2019 11:16:01 #
Seth wrote:
You know, Smedley's right. Maybe schmuck WOULD be a better term, even though I risk offending schmucks everywhere.
F schmucks? No offense. I suppose since Bobjob uses the F letter, it doesn't count like the F word.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.