From your link:

”How many Filibusters during Obama administration?
During the first four years of the Obama administration, his Republican opposition used the filibuster a record number of times. Sources vary, but most agree it more than 125 times, and some sources say it was as much as 200 times.

undefined undefined undefined undefined undefined undefined”
__________________________________

The challenge by Linda Joy, was for you to list/name these filibusters!! Not find a source that regurgitates your claim. Why is this so difficult for you to understand?

I still recommend Kevin Philips epic book " Wealth And Democracy" A Political History of The American Rich from 1897 to 2000. The book has three interrelated themes. First, it is a history of the accumulation of wealth in the United States that argues that great fortunes have always been built on cooperation between government and business, not on free trade or hands-off policies by government. Second, it suggests that there is a cyclical pattern to economic history, with the Second, it suggests that there is a cyclical pattern to economic history, with the accumulation of wealth leading to economies based on financial speculation rather than on the production of goods and services. Third, it maintains that the United States should pursue an industrial policy and that this policy should emphasize the interests of labor over the interests of capital. Phillips begins by tracing American fortunes through the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. These fortunes, he argues, were subsidized by governmental activities. Many of the rich, such as the politically connected Robert Morris (1745-1815), became America’s first war profiteers through government contracts and by operating privateer ships during the American war for independence. In the young United States, the economic policies of Alexander Hamilton (1755-1804) tended to favor the wealthy speculators, who had bought up federal and state certificates of debt at cut rates, and to penalize average Americans, who paid governmental debts through taxes on goods, known as excise taxes. The Hamiltonian policy of maintaining a central bank, the Bank of the United States, contributed to governmental support of wealthy financial speculators. The Civil War provided the next big spur to the growth of wealth, once again through government spending on war-related goods. Government support for the railroads helped to create the great fortunes of the nineteenth century. The twentieth century, Phillips argues, saw both economic booms and political reactions against the concentration of wealth. The great fortunes of the first decade met with the first efforts at political control of the rich. The populism of the nineteenth century gave way to the progressivism of the early twentieth and the progressives, particularly during the administration of President Theodore Roosevelt from 1901 to1909, tried to bring the market under control. Wealth gained the upper hand again after World War I, resulting in the speculative boom of the 1920’s. After excessive speculation led to a crash, the most successful efforts at governmental direction of the economy were undertaken during the administration of President Franklin D. Roosevelt from 1933 to 1945. This resulted in a rather long period of relative egalitarianism that was shaken only by later speculative booms in the 1980’s and 1990’s. Broadening his view, Phillips maintains that American economic history has been following a cycle found in the histories of earlier great powers. The amassing of great wealth leads to financialization, financial speculation as an economic activity that replaces the actual production of goods. As investment itself becomes the center of interest, larger segments of a nation’s population are drawn into investment, resulting in manias and economic bubbles. Temporarily, many middle income people seem to benefit by bubbles, but these inevitably burst, leaving wealth more concentrated among those at the top. Speculation also ultimately leads to economic decline, since the finances absorb much of a nation’s investment and production of goods is left to other nations. Phillips offers the cases of Spain in the...16th 17th centuries.

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/the-senate-gops-unprecedented-obstruction-in-five-charts/
I never avoid Linda Joy. The link I gave her noted at least 158 Republican filibusters in Obamas first four years and possibly up to 200 obstructions in just the first four years. I welcome any debate with Linda Joy. She is a smart lady but unfortunately she is a conservative and Conservatives have no ammo. In all of history they have only had one great idea that Idea? Some things need to be conserved--that's it end of story. All progressive ideas such as the steam engine the internal combustion engine ect are the ideas of progressive minded men and women. Conservatives make their money off of other peoples inventions

The Dim-O-Crats got America involved in Vietnam so they could get filthy rich from selling "war material" to the Government. Charging $100 for a $5 hammer.

Republican president Richard Nixon put a stop to that. That's why he was set up with the so called Watergate break in.

Now that President Trump has broken up the Obama's plan for Hillary Clinton to continue to rob the taxpayers money they tried to pull the same thing on him. But President Trump wasn't that easy of a target.

🇺🇸 God bless America and President Trump.