One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out topic: Impeach Biden?
Main
Abortions USA
Page <<first <prev 4 of 31 next> last>>
Jan 31, 2019 17:00:36   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Iamdjchrys wrote:
Under the circumstances, yes I do. One is here dealing with life and on a daily basis,


Abortion is NOT dealing with life! Abortion is AVOIDING dealing.

Quote:
the other is a projected possibility


"Projected possibility?" A baby in the womb is a PERSON!

Quote:
that may be the aftermath of violent rape, incest, or other physical trauma to the girl/woman.


Ya...go ahead and see how few abortions are done for those reasons and how many are done for the sake of convenience.

Quote:
You and I, and the government, are not qualified or conversant with each case.


No...which is why abortion needs to continue to be a medical procedure.

Quote:
It is not our, or the government's, right to intrude on anyone's personal health decisions.


Unless I kill 2 or 3 people a day my health goes all to sht. Can't sleep, can't eat.

If I don't rob a convenience store now and then I start feeling insecure and next thing you know I'm seeing a shrink.

Quote:
Legal abortion supporters recognize this.


Which STILL doesn't mean they are obliged to pay for it or speak well of it.

Quote:
Pro-lifers (better described as pro-birthers)


What horrible sounding people! Good thing most are Pro-deathers and Pro-abortion like you.

Quote:
do not, apparently,


Some don't. Don't paint with too broad a brush. For instance, Libertarians may not be specifically opposed to abortion as long as they person getting it PAYS for it. Some folks are against it after a certain point yadayada…

Quote:
and therefore support the re-establishment of back-alley "doctors", coat hanger abortions, etc.


NO! YOU support that and you can't see why.

What's the difference between eastern and western medical philosophy?

One is proactive and the other is reactive. In the case of unwanted pregnancy, 90% (guestimate) of them could have been prevented. Tell me I'm wrong.

The very first (numero uno) rule of avoiding unwanted pregnancy is save it for marriage. Save it for the person you want to have children with...it's just biology.

But here in America we've become fixated hedonism, cheap thrills and the avoidance of consequences. The thing about consequences is they come no matter what and attempt to avoid them usually just makes the consequences show up somewhere else...the ratio of working Americans paying Social Security for the retired is just one example or women who have abortions and never forgive themselves for it. My dearly departed wife was one of them.

Quote:
I don't see too many of them contributing support for babies born with severe deformation, inoperable medical conditions, or other birth defects.


Where have you looked? You have to open your eyes to see. Whatever information bubble you live in I promise you...if you ventured outside of it you'll find all kinds of stuff you don't know and have never seen.

How much hanging out with prolifers and church folks do you do on a daily basis, anyway? Not much, I bet.

Without looking myself I could go online and find thousands of prolife organizations that perform lifesaving procedures such as you mentioned for everyone!

NOT ONLY THAT! Christian organizations, in particular go all over the world digging wells, founding schools, building homes and providing medical care to ease whatever crisies they find when they get there.

NOT ONLY THAT! Prolifers pay taxes too...and taxpayers pay quite a bit.

If that's all you do...if you don't go an extra mile like you say the prolifers don't, what makes you better than them?

Well...you're not. And you aren't doing a damn thing more to allieviate the plight of unwanted people than any other callous fk who would just as soon kill them.

Quote:
This is prima facie hypocrisy, and I stand by my post.


Ah...you were being hypocritical and you admit it! Good job.

Reply
Jan 31, 2019 17:49:16   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
PeterS wrote:
Sanctioned or un-sanctioned you can't control another humans body. Why you conservatives think you can I don't know but women had abortions before RvW and they will have abortions after RvW.


Are your words here pointing out that Roe v. Wade is about to be declared unconstitutional? It seems that you of the wild left lean are really worried about that happening. I have seen too many of your kind talking about just that. It seems that one of your main talking points seems to have to do with the death of Roe v. Wade since most of you are sure that our newest Supreme Court Justice will bring on the death of that Court decision. That Kavanaugh must have a lot of power, maybe more than the rest of the Court.

Reply
Jan 31, 2019 18:00:22   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
SGM B wrote:
Just curious, since you are such an advocate for human rights...tell me, just when, according to you, does the baby get his or her rights. You seem to agree with late term abortion, right up to the point of birth, then you also seem to approve the act of killing the child after consultation between mother and Doctor if the abortion is botched and the baby is born live.
Just so you know, abortion does make a woman no longer pregnant - but she is still a mother, albeit the mother of a dead baby.

SGM B out.
Just curious, since you are such an advocate for h... (show quote)


Outstanding words that won't ever be acceptable to the Far Left, at least those who elected the Virginia governor and Governor Cuomo of New York. Actually it is impossible to discuss abortion with people who support those two men since they take the words of men like them and run with them. Damned nice try.

Reply
Jan 31, 2019 18:31:05   #
Joanie Gardener
 
Our lives begin with a heart that beats and end when the heartbeat stops. A beating human embryo has a heart at 22 days after conception. It beats on day 22. Therefore it is a living being. I believe abortions should never be allowed. A woman does have a choice: birth control or abstinence..

Reply
Jan 31, 2019 18:36:02   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
TommyRadd wrote:
What about the baby’s body you murderer?

A heart beat is snuffed out. And now it’s out that even if a baby survives a botched abortion it is snuffed out- murdered!

You kill those who are inconvenient and call it a right? You kill those who you don’t want and don’t realize it shows how despicable you are?

You have no moral compass. You deny science that proves that unborn person has life, feelings and a heartbeat but it’s still not viable! And you think you should have a voice?

https://youtu.be/z-kYAv8qKN0
What about the baby’s body you murderer? br br A ... (show quote)


Tommy, I agree with this nurse 100% but I thought, while listening the second time that she doesn't live in Virginia or New York so she will have to give in to their laws or take a chance of being tried and jailed for breaking the new laws. Yes, talking about this is good but going to jail for not wanting to obey the law isn't really too good, I don't think. If she lives in one of those states she will have to obey the new law as those two Governors will come after her.

Killing viable babies is surely murder but with laws like these legal. I remember our President Obama voting for just this thing in Illinois. It is too bad he wasn't out of the Illinois Legislature when he voted that vote but that makes him kind of a murderer.

Last evening I listened to Tucker Carlson trying to get one of those people who have always supported abortion and never allowed him to even try to change the subject without trying to get on Roe v. Wade. She was doing just what he accused her of, using Democrat talking points the way THEY do and he finally kicked her off the air.

Reply
Jan 31, 2019 18:38:20   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
Joanie Gardener wrote:
Our lives begin with a heart that beats and end when the heartbeat stops. A beating human embryo has a heart at 22 days after conception. It beats on day 22. Therefore it is a living being. I believe abortions should never be allowed. A woman does have a choice: birth control or abstinence..


If you are a Christian I would ask you define when Christ in the womb first became both man and God possessing a soul?

Prior to your 22 days is that foetus life?

Reply
Jan 31, 2019 20:55:52   #
debeda
 
byronglimish wrote:
Very few abortions are to remove and terminate deformity or rapes.

Most are for convenience!



Reply
 
 
Jan 31, 2019 21:09:50   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
oldroy wrote:
Tommy, I agree with this nurse 100% but I thought, while listening the second time that she doesn't live in Virginia or New York so she will have to give in to their laws or take a chance of being tried and jailed for breaking the new laws. Yes, talking about this is good but going to jail for not wanting to obey the law isn't really too good, I don't think. If she lives in one of those states she will have to obey the new law as those two Governors will come after her.

Killing viable babies is surely murder but with laws like these legal. I remember our President Obama voting for just this thing in Illinois. It is too bad he wasn't out of the Illinois Legislature when he voted that vote but that makes him kind of a murderer.

Last evening I listened to Tucker Carlson trying to get one of those people who have always supported abortion and never allowed him to even try to change the subject without trying to get on Roe v. Wade. She was doing just what he accused her of, using Democrat talking points the way THEY do and he finally kicked her off the air.
Tommy, I agree with this nurse 100% but I thought,... (show quote)


Oldroy, I hadn’t thought about that. Thanks for pointing it out! Scary when doing the moral thing becomes illegal! But we Christians have seen it coming, doesn’t mean it still isn’t shocking!

I think I also saw that exchange with Tucker Carlson.

Reply
Jan 31, 2019 22:29:22   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
TommyRadd wrote:
Well said!!!

I couldn’t read paste his post without replying as you did!


People minimize this kind of thing. Everyone who speaks so casually about such a despicable act needs some Clockwork Orange style reality therapy by being forced to watch abortions in living color until they get it!

Reply
Jan 31, 2019 22:46:35   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
byronglimish wrote:
Another little point....I have heard that women who take the 💊 and have abortions, are at higher risk for certain cancers.

Both of these are provided by Unplanned/Planned Parenthood


My wife had 3 abortions as a young woman then had a son at 22. At 25 she did a complete about face. Gave up partying, divorced her biker husband took her son raised him on her own. She had been single 11 years when I met her, straight as an arrow, good job go to church gal...which is where I met her.

And 20 something years after her last abortion developed inflammatory breast cancer, which at that time usually killed a year after diagnosis. She lived 6 years and had many surgeries, radiation treatments, chemo.

Her previous abortions haunted her, wondering who those babies would have been. It was the only thing I ever saw her keep from her Ma and sister.

She found out about the studies you mentioned...young women who have multiple abortions have a ridiculously higher level of certain cancers. That's what she figured she did to herself.

It occurs to me many years later that women with cancers in her family may be even more at risk and that was my wife.

Reply
Jan 31, 2019 22:50:09   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
byronglimish wrote:
Very few abortions are to remove and terminate deformity or rapes.

Most are for convenience!


Wait until we start seeing how many have been being done for sex selection.

Reply
Jan 31, 2019 23:23:03   #
Ricktloml
 
byronglimish wrote:
Very few abortions are to remove and terminate deformity or rapes.

Most are for convenience!


Less than 1% of abortions are performed to save the mother's life. And before Roe V Wade most doctors did so anyway. The "father" of the abortion movement, Dr. Bernard Nathanson admitted he lied about the number of women injured or killed getting a so called "back-ally abortion". When asked he said 10,000, the number was actually 200-250. He personally performed hundreds of abortions, and said he really believed legalizing abortion would help women. He was hailed by pro-abortion advocates as a saint. As medical science advanced, (ultra-sound ect.) he asked a woman if he could put a camera in her womb and film her abortion. She agreed. When he saw the baby trying to get away from the sharp instruments that would dismember him or her, he never performed another abortion. He said abortion was the killing of a baby and was immoral. He made the film Silent Scream, and the same people who lionized him for lying, vilified him for telling the truth

Reply
Jan 31, 2019 23:48:11   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
BigMike wrote:
My wife had 3 abortions as a young woman then had a son at 22. At 25 she did a complete about face. Gave up partying, divorced her biker husband took her son raised him on her own. She had been single 11 years when I met her, straight as an arrow, good job go to church gal...which is where I met her.

And 20 something years after her last abortion developed inflammatory breast cancer, which at that time usually killed a year after diagnosis. She lived 6 years and had many surgeries, radiation treatments, chemo.

Her previous abortions haunted her, wondering who those babies would have been. It was the only thing I ever saw her keep from her Ma and sister.

She found out about the studies you mentioned...young women who have multiple abortions have a ridiculously higher level of certain cancers. That's what she figured she did to herself.

It occurs to me many years later that women with cancers in her family may be even more at risk and that was my wife.
My wife had 3 abortions as a young woman then had ... (show quote)




Your wife hung in there, she was a courageous fighter!

I have had a couple of radical surgeries do to cancer too.

I was fairly mean in my younger days, and accept that I reap what I sowed.

Reply
Jan 31, 2019 23:49:59   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Ricktloml wrote:
Less than 1% of abortions are performed to save the mother's life. And before Roe V Wade most doctors did so anyway. The "father" of the abortion movement, Dr. Bernard Nathanson admitted he lied about the number of women injured or killed getting a so called "back-ally abortion". When asked he said 10,000, the number was actually 200-250. He personally performed hundreds of abortions, and said he really believed legalizing abortion would help women. He was hailed by pro-abortion advocates as a saint. As medical science advanced, (ultra-sound ect.) he asked a woman if he could put a camera in her womb and film her abortion. She agreed. When he saw the baby trying to get away from the sharp instruments that would dismember him or her, he never performed another abortion. He said abortion was the killing of a baby and was immoral. He made the film Silent Scream, and the same people who lionized him for lying, vilified him for telling the truth
Less than 1% of abortions are performed to save th... (show quote)




Pure evil.

Reply
Feb 1, 2019 02:48:33   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
oldroy wrote:
Are your words here pointing out that Roe v. Wade is about to be declared unconstitutional? It seems that you of the wild left lean are really worried about that happening. I have seen too many of your kind talking about just that. It seems that one of your main talking points seems to have to do with the death of Roe v. Wade since most of you are sure that our newest Supreme Court Justice will bring on the death of that Court decision. That Kavanaugh must have a lot of power, maybe more than the rest of the Court.
Are your words here pointing out that Roe v. Wade ... (show quote)


"The Roe v. Wade decision held that a woman, with her doctor, could choose abortion in earlier months of pregnancy without legal restriction, based primarily on the right to privacy. In later trimesters, state restrictions could be applied." Jone Johnson Lewis

Jone Johnson Lewis is a former writer for ThoughtCo. She is an ordained humanist minister. Lewis has taught on the topic of women in religious history as an adjunct faculty member at Meadville/Lombard Theological School. She has also been involved in the women's movement since the late 1960s.


Not exactly a right winger's testimony. "Based primarily on the right to privacy", huh?

I doesn't seem to me "right to privacy" and "right to an abortion" perfectly juxtapose. I see how they can but that might not always be the case.

Maybe, when they bring Ginsberg's corpse out and admit she's been on ice, Trump can appoint another Constitutionalist and we can all have a little civics lesson.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 31 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.