One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
No Matter...tilll it matters
Page <<first <prev 9 of 19 next> last>>
Mar 11, 2014 11:37:41   #
Comment Loc: California
 
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wow! What an indictment of your conservative "friends". Do you actually have any real friends who are conservative, or do you use the term tongue-in-cheek.

"When I read the Bible, I notice that the most talked about subject is charity and helping the poor. (By far) But my conservative friends seem to hate the poor, as though they have not right to exist. Certainly they don't deserve food or medical care or the right to vote."

Let me ask you this: How exactly do you define charity? This is one of the greatest divides the two major political parties have. The left sees charity as stealing from the person who has something in order to give it to the poorer one. The one "giving" it to the poor didn't own it to give. The victim of the theft was the owner of the gift. The thief was merely a thief - no real charity happened.

What do you see as "helping a poor person"? You might say that he deserves welfare. To an extent I agree ........ if he is down on his luck, he needs a helping hand. But if you give him welfare indefinitely, what are you actually DOING to him? You are enabling sloth and laziness and he is no better prepared to help himself than he was in the beginning. Eventually he comes to see it as his "right". Conservatives believe in giving a helping hand, and most do so without government demanding it. Conservatives are not big on advertising their generosity. Their method is NOT to get on TV and beg for donations. Some of the biggest generosity in the nation comes from quiet and unheralded generous conservatives.

The political left has lost all contact with true generosity. Generosity comes from the heart. I have never seen ANYTHING resembling generosity come from government, have you? Government has no heart and government has no conscience. But the left wants tax dollars to provide their generosity, not their own dollars. Now their own tax dollars could honestly be called "generosity", but generosity by virtue of stealing from others is hardly "generosity" - it is plain theft.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ br Wow! What an ind... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 11, 2014 11:39:35   #
Ve'hoe
 
That is not true, religion gives us a list of rules to aspire to,, do you throw the whole thing out if you cant hit them all, or keep trying?

The person who fails, and keeps trying is the religious one, and the one I prefer to live around. The one who says, "He failed so his religion is bullshit" (Ie: YOU) is neither a better man nor a more moral man, he just has the advantage of no written record of his failures.

I prefer sins of commission not sins of ommission.


Blacksheep wrote:
No, I'm saying that NO religion can be offered up as the foundation of good citizenship. When people behave it's either because they want to by nature or do so out of fear of punishment, mostly. Religions don't make us better people and none of them ever has. We either are, or we aren't. We all have different natures.

Reply
Mar 11, 2014 11:39:37   #
vernon
 
bmac32 wrote:
I wish you and your kind didn't exist! Your an idiot and I bet your mother was real proud.


dont answer him he gets off when he gets a rise out of someone

Reply
 
 
Mar 11, 2014 11:41:00   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Blacksheep wrote:
That's my point. A true Christian would be someone who devotes their life to emulating Christ. In all my life I've never met a single person who did. What Christians really are, is people who go for the religion because they were brought up to believe a bunch of dogma that they would go to some heaven if they only believe that Jesus was god, and that they can do bad things and be forgiven.

That by itself just doesn't make good people out of anyone or teach them right behavior.


Does this mean I should get a refund on those Papal indulgences I bought on e bay?

Reply
Mar 11, 2014 11:41:52   #
Ve'hoe
 
Depends on whether you used them or not...


banjojack wrote:
Does this mean I should get a refund on those Papal indulgences I bought on e bay?

Reply
Mar 11, 2014 11:48:47   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
Depends on whether you used them or not...


They didn't work. Seems like the Pope can't absolve you after all.

Reply
Mar 11, 2014 11:49:39   #
Ve'hoe
 
Go Figure!!


banjojack wrote:
They didn't work. Seems like the Pope can't absolve you after all.

Reply
 
 
Mar 11, 2014 11:56:39   #
Blacksheep
 
banjojack wrote:
Does this mean I should get a refund on those Papal indulgences I bought on e bay?


As soon as possible. Hurry before they expire. :-D

Reply
Mar 11, 2014 11:58:58   #
Blacksheep
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
That is not true, religion gives us a list of rules to aspire to,, do you throw the whole thing out if you cant hit them all, or keep trying?

The person who fails, and keeps trying is the religious one, and the one I prefer to live around. The one who says, "He failed so his religion is bullshit" (Ie: YOU) is neither a better man nor a more moral man, he just has the advantage of no written record of his failures.

I prefer sins of commission not sins of ommission.


Would you care to tell us which sins you commit? Go ahead, we'll wait while you draw up the list. :D

Reply
Mar 11, 2014 11:59:50   #
Comment Loc: California
 
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are correct in everything you've written here. I was in nursing school in the '50's. People who had no money, no insurance were admitted to the hospitals, got the same care as everyone else, saw the same doctors as everyone else, and were not forced to pay for their care. So that on-going preventative care as well as minor ailments could be provided, doctors within the community donated their time taking turns staffing a downtown clinic for those who could not afford medical care otherwise.

Additionally, there were county hospitals around the country for the indigent who could not afford hospitalization. Government began in the '60's knowing that it knew more about health than doctors, nurses and hospitals and it began shutting down county hospitals because - they were damaging to the psyche of the poor. The poor should not be required to appear poor. That is when welfare kicked in, overboard, naturally.

No one was poorer than my folks, yet they would have died before accepting one red cent of welfare. They worked hard and had long hours of sweat and grime. They did it out of pride in themselves being able to support themselves because to do otherwise would be shameful. Most welfare recipients of today would LAUGH at them for being so stupid. That is where I got my work ethic, my grounding in responsible living, my ability to budget and stay out of debt.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ br You are correct i... (show quote)


I too was very poor while growing up. 7 kids. For months we had only a thousand things to eat, Pinto beans. No indoor plumbing. Never got a nickel in free stuff. I always had 1 pair of shoes, two pair of jeans and tree shirts. That's all I ever had until I was 15 and started cleaning manure from barns and chicken houses. I didn't know how I was going to break out of my economic status but, I knew that I would work hard to climb that mountain. That's what my parents taught us. Not one of my siblings remained in poverty. I guess that's what made this ole Ozark Mountain Hillbilly tough. If my siblings and I can do it every body can.-----if they want to. But, no ! It's too easy to sit at home where everything around is paid for by the gov. Welfare pays more than minimum wage. Welfare is evil because it removes one's motivation to work.

Reply
Mar 11, 2014 12:00:50   #
teaman
 
The main reason I rarely post God's message here is because faith and believe in Jesus is a personal thing that should be conveyed in person when possible. Most people do not study the Bible even though they may occasionally read it/parts of it anyway! To answer your question why True Christians are conservative, please read the following;(and as you are reading this, please remember, Jesus NEVER HELPED ANYONE WHO "HAD THE ABILITY TO HELP THEMSELFS")

KEEP JESUS OUT OF YOUR SOCIALISM


From the words of Jesus and the New Testament, ministering to the poor and the needy among us is the work of Christian individuals and the church, not the secular government. Jesus said, "The Spirit of the Lord is on me, because He has anointed me to preach good news to the poor. . . ." Today's Religious Left wants to change that to, "He has anointed the federal government to preach good news to the poor."

The Christian gospel is a message of salvation, not a message of income redistribution and raising our neighbor's taxes. Jesus said that the way to serve the poor is by giving generously of our own resources. "But when you give a banquet," He said in Luke 14, "invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed. Although they cannot repay you, you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous."

The Religious Left is very generous -- with other people's money. In fact, I believe the founder of the Religious Left was none other than Judas Iscariot. When Mary, the sister of Lazarus, anointed Jesus with costly perfume just days before the crucifixion, Judas lectured her and said, "Why wasn't this perfume sold and the money given to the poor?"

Notice that Judas put on a show of caring for the poor -- even though the money was Mary's, not his! The motives of Judas, John 12:6 tells us, were corrupt and self-centered -- and Jesus responded with a stinging rebuke.

At least one of the Lord's disciples was a "social action Christian" in the Sojourners mold: Simon Zelotes (Simon the Zealot). Just as Sojourners president Jim Wallis was once president of the Michigan State chapter of the militant Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), Simon Zelotes was a young political radical who attached himself to Jesus because he thought Jesus would lead a revolt against the Roman Empire.

Simon saw Jesus as a political Messiah who would topple the powerful while lifting up the poor and oppressed(EXACTLY WHAT PEOPLE SEE IN OBAMA). But Jesus was not a political Messiah. He didn't attack the Roman Empire. He did battle with the Evil Empire of Satan himself.

Jesus didn't tell the Roman government what its budget priorities should be. Why? Because His agenda was much larger than the agenda of Simon Zelotes or the Religious Left. His eyes were fixed on eternity. He said, "My kingdom is not of this world."

The Religious Left has missed the meaning of that statement. Yes, there is a place for Christian social action -- but that place is in a personal lifestyle of generosity and compassion to the poor. Jesus didn't tell the rich young ruler to become a political activist and affect public policy. He said, "Go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me."

It's true, there's poverty in America, and some of the poor can't lift themselves out of poverty without help. Some are physically or socially disadvantaged. Some are down on their luck. They need and deserve Christian compassion and the good news of the gospel.

But a huge number of people receiving government assistance are substance abusers, welfare cheats, or chronically lazy. Doesn't the Bible tell us, "If a man will not work, he shall not eat" (2 Thessalonians 3:10)? Why must the "makers" of society support the "takers" of society? That's not compassion. That's theft. Wouldn't it be more compassionate to encourage the takers to develop self-respect by becoming productive citizens?

Would Jesus endorse government policies that encourage and enable addiction, indolence, and welfare fraud? Certainly not. The Religious Left should read His parables, especially the Parable of the Talents (Matthew 25:14-30), the Parable of the Vineyards (Matthew 20:1-16), and the Parable of the Tenants (Matthew 21:33-46). In those parables, Jesus blesses hard work, personal responsibility, and the freedom to achieve.

Government programs can't separate the truly needy from the welfare cheats -- but private Christian charities can. Private charities are far more effective than government at meeting needs, changing lives, eliminating fraud and waste, and dispensing compassion. Our stance as Christians should be pro-compassion, not pro-bureaucracy.

The place for compassionate Christian social action is in the church, and in the lives of individual believers. When the church becomes a political pressure group, telling the government, "Confiscate more wealth from those who earned it and give it to those who have not," then the church has formed an unholy union with the kingdoms of this world.

Income redistribution is not Christianity. It's Marxism -- and mixing the two only pollutes the Gospel and betrays the Great Commission.

The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.
Thomas Jefferson

Reply
 
 
Mar 11, 2014 12:09:36   #
skott Loc: Bama
 
Billhuggins wrote:
Common sense says to me: Help my neighbor, but not buy him a car, pay his rent, buy his food, buy his cell phone, etc (list is incomplete.) The Bible says help thy neighbor. It does not say support him for a lifetime. Some think that it is their right to be supported while making no contribution to society what-so-ever. The Social Contract demands that every member of society contribute to that society. No body rides for free. While it is true that no one signs The Social Contract, members are obligated to contribute or, face banishment there from.
Common sense says to me: Help my neighbor, but not... (show quote)


It was a good comment. So we should teach them to fish, but we still feed them while we are teaching them. I'm all for that. I don't advocate just letting people stay at home. Our current welfare system has many problems that could be cured. The problem is the cures aren't allowed, by people who just want it gone.

Reply
Mar 11, 2014 12:18:54   #
skott Loc: Bama
 
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Absolutely right! I don't call myself a Christian, though I do believe in God. And that is irrelevant to what I want to say, and that is this: Christianity coupled with individual freedoms are what has held this country together for a couple of centuries. Now we see both being heralded as CRIMES. We cannot allow this to happen. Once we have lost all of our morality and Christianity is no longer legal to operate openly, our freedoms will have been removed and our nation is gone, gone.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ br br Absolutely right! ... (show quote)


Tasine, read the post on page 9 by a conservative. He just made the same case that I talked about my conservative friends making. He told why we should not be truly helping the poor. He had to pick and choose from the Bible verses to get there.

Reply
Mar 11, 2014 12:20:40   #
vernon
 
Dummy Boy wrote:
I agree A.E.
A recent assessment in Florida proves 98% of people that collect welfare do not use drugs. And further studies indicate that the 2% were probably false positives due to medications they were taking.
Yes, even Paul Ryan's recent report about the poor indicates that people who collect welfare collect for no more than 2 years.


i personally know people who have never worked in their life some of them havent had jobs for generations ,i dont really pay much attention to reports or studies that really just set out to prove what they want to hear

Reply
Mar 11, 2014 12:23:00   #
Retired669
 
vernon wrote:
i personally know people who have never worked in their life some of them havent had jobs for generations ,i dont really pay much attention to reports or studies that really just set out to prove what they want to hear




Even when they are by your fellow cons who would just as soon screw you as they would anyone else? :mrgreen:

Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 19 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.