straightUp wrote:
As much as draft-dodger Trump wants to be associated with the military, recent developments show that the military isn't returning the enthusiasm. First, the Pentagon tells Trump that his extravagant military parade was too frivolous so they're going to postpone it for now. Aw, now Trump won't get to experience that dictator's wet-dream of having thousands of troops saluting him while on parade.
Then Ret. Admiral William McRaven sends a letter to Trump slamming him for revoking the security clearance of his opponents and requesting that Trump revoke his clearance too so he can have the honor of joining the others in their outspoken resistance to the reckless, half-wit. And now Ret. Lt. General Mark Hertling is standing by the Admiral and saying the same thing.
I know there are a number of veterans on this site that support Trump, but I bet none of them are generals or admirals. Unlike the business world that Trump comes, from where sufficient wealth from daddy can guarantee a certain level of success, the military is entirely merit-based. You can't "buy" your way up the ranks. Military personalities range from barely-literate to the highly-intelligent and in a merit-based system the barely-literate don't rise to levels of command like McRaven and Hertling did.
Of course, dissonance isn't tolerated in the rank and file either, which may explain why commanders remain muted until AFTER retiring; speaking of which... Stars and Stripes ran a story in September 2016 covering the fact that no less than 15 retired generals and admirals united to hold a press conference in which they endorsed Clinton as the smart choice for Commander-In-Chief and warned that Trump would be dangerous to military and country.
https://www.stripes.com/news/former-admirals-and-generals-warn-trump-is-dangerous-to-military-and-country-1.430242After winning the election anyway, Trump issued a ban on trans-gendered people serving in the military and he found himself confronted by no less than 56 retired generals and admirals that clearly drew a distinction between Trump's bigotry and the more objective rationale of top-brass command.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/56-generals-admirals-trump-trans-military-ban_us_5980abb2e4b00bb8ff39fcedAnd there's more but you all get the point... Never before in our post-Civil War history has a U.S. President been so resoundingly opposed by top level commanders in the U.S. military. In all, it may be better for Trump if he were kicked out of the White House through politics because at least then, he can play up that victim role of the "unfairly treated president" that he likes so much. Otherwise, he is likely to push things too far and wind up getting b#tch-slapped by his own military command. That wouldn't be so good for him.
As much as draft-dodger Trump wants to be associat... (
show quote)
The Australian Navy will keep its trans-gender-sailors from what I heard in stories I really don't know the official position I don't think it's going to become not an offence to bag them out, similar to letting them cuddle up in a wombat hole only in the deep blue sea, I hate it when I'm offensive like that but I love Wombats soooo much as soon as one of the wonderful critters enters my head I just have to write it down.
However reading this article " China and Russia strengthening relationship in bid to thwart US dominance" posted on the ABC.
That's our Top Broadcaster, no adds, Gov owned and operated since 1956.
Anyhow this article posted today tells me that the Australian Government think Trump is leaving the White House soon, or they badly want him too, Heaven only knows why pass the popcorn.
Here is a quick outline of the propaganda.
Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin are in the midst of a budding bromance.
Russian sausage and vodka is mentioned as Mr.Xi called Putin his best, most intimate friend, goes on about cosying up to Iran as Axis of Autocrats this alliance is helped along by a common enemy no other than Donald Trump's sanctions and tariffs.
Mr. Putin and Xi have met 26 times and one's coming up next month forging the deepest and strongest relationship since 1979.
Their biggest ambition is to thwart American dominance in the World Order and with the help of Iran, they are proving effective in shaping events from Syria to North Korea.
Some obscure Christian University in Tokyo becomes the source of this story telling us that.
"China is feeling the heat, so by strengthening relations with Russia, stressing Comradeship between Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin, the growing military tie -- this is a way to send a message to the United States that China does have options and Russia is a powerful option that can provide energy resources as well".
Authoritarianism is mentioned in a very positive light.
Real ties getting stronger becoming partners in a military relationship.
Then there is this graphic video of "recently tested" (meaning hypersonic) ballistic missiles fired from Russia from two different directions ending in a north south termination flight of 10 multiple war heads on each missile.
"If we look back 15 years Russians only provide second or third-grade military hardware to China but today Russia is providing top-grade military technology and equipment. This is indicative of a shift on the Russian side.
So Toyko tells us, * and we don't normally listen to Japs.
What THE ABC is saying is that Trump is going to be impeached the sooner the better, that's the Australian Broadcasting Commission saying that, and it is likely while Trump is being perceived around the World as irrational.