archie bunker wrote:
Liberal? Me?
Boy, I've been called a lot of nasty things on here, but never anything THAT nasty!
kazudy didn't mean it Arch
he' misspoke'
badbobby wrote:
kazudy didn't mean it Arch
he' misspoke'
If you say so Bobby.
I respect your opinions, so I'll cancel my plans to pull up the hedges around his house, and kick his dog.
archie bunker wrote:
Liberal? Me?
Boy, I've been called a lot of nasty things on here, but never anything THAT nasty!
I truly apologize. I must have misread one of your replies.
JoyV wrote:
Just so long as our bank accounts continue to reflect the "delusional" increases; I could care less whether I'm labeled delusional or deplorable.
So as long as you have what you seem to want & all is fair in how others are treated.
If that is the case then you should stand readily to meet the backlash that is coming.
permafrost wrote:
NO,
You find and read the specific which they tried to charge her under and you will find the "intent" to be of pivotal importance.
Quote the law which requires intent. And just who tried to charge her? Congress investigated the investigation but has no authority to charge. That is for the Justice Department to do. Investigating crime is for law enforcement. Prosecuting crime is for the Justice Department. Overseeing these departments (which are in the executive branch) is for Congress (in the legislative branch). Once a charge or a suite is brought, trying it is for the courts (in the judicial branch).
So I ask again. Who TRIED to charge her?
JoyV wrote:
Quote the law which requires intent. And just who tried to charge her? Congress investigated the investigation but has no authority to charge. That is for the Justice Department to do. Investigating crime is for law enforcement. Prosecuting crime is for the Justice Department. Overseeing these departments (which are in the executive branch) is for Congress (in the legislative branch). Once a charge or a suite is brought, trying it is for the courts (in the judicial branch).
So I ask again. Who TRIED to charge her?
Quote the law which requires intent. And just who... (
show quote)
Easy, the republicans/right wingers tried to charge her..
But she was not guilty of any wrong doing.. they fell through their butt..
Even with Gowdy trying to introduce false evidence.. they had nothing but wishes..
20 plus years of pursuing the woman and got nothing..
But you people did prove hate and lies work in politics..
With a little help from Russia, you kept Lady Hillary out of the white house.. all those decades and all those millions of $$$ got that for you..
Now if the liberals will pay attention and see what worked, they can also use that method ...
permafrost wrote:
Yet, Arizona lost in the court case.. so you do not agree with the court finding.. Now you insist our court system is mean and evil, and that it is all President Obama fault..
I feel that courts follow the law in these cases, therefore the overturning of the Arizona law was fully acceptable and should have been expected..
I point out the details including the fallacies perpetuated by the media. Arizona's S.B. 1070 was NOT found to be discriminatory. It was found to lack jurisdiction. I do not dispute their finding. I do find it unconscionable that the federal government's refusal to enforce federal law precipitated our state's desperation to DO SOMETHING to slow the atrocities!!!! We personally knew 4 of the murdered (by illegals) in our county, and knew of others but not personally. These were not four murdered in a single incident but four separate incidents spaced over time. There is a reason those of us living on the Mexican border say we are living on the front lines!
Floyd Brown wrote:
So as long as you have what you seem to want & all is fair in how others are treated.
If that is the case then you should stand readily to meet the backlash that is coming.
If there is a backlash, I will stand to meet it. I already stood to defend my country by volunteering for the US Army. I was honorably discharged in 1978. So if there is a backlash for upholding our constitution and laws, and for negotiating trade deals which are fair to the US; I am ready to stand behind those and other American ideals and any pro-American policies!
JoyV wrote:
I point out the details including the fallacies perpetuated by the media. Arizona's S.B. 1070 was NOT found to be discriminatory. It was found to lack jurisdiction. I do not dispute their finding. I do find it unconscionable that the federal government's refusal to enforce federal law precipitated our state's desperation to DO SOMETHING to slow the atrocities!!!! We personally knew 4 of the murdered (by illegals) in our county, and knew of others but not personally. These were not four murdered in a single incident but four separate incidents spaced over time. There is a reason those of us living on the Mexican border say we are living on the front lines!
I point out the details including the fallacies pe... (
show quote)
I would recommend, as so many right wingers are quick to tell a liberal, that if you do not like the laws and living in our county.... MOVE,...
The courts decided.. what are you wanting to do, grab a gun and show those fools what a patriot you are??
permafrost wrote:
Easy, the republicans/right wingers tried to charge her..
But she was not guilty of any wrong doing.. they fell through their butt..
Even with Gowdy trying to introduce false evidence.. they had nothing but wishes..
20 plus years of pursuing the woman and got nothing..
But you people did prove hate and lies work in politics..
With a little help from Russia, you kept Lady Hillary out of the white house.. all those decades and all those millions of $$$ got that for you..
Now if the liberals will pay attention and see what worked, they can also use that method ...
Easy, the republicans/right wingers tried to charg... (
show quote)
Which Republicans and which right wingers? I don't believe the DOJ is an offshoot of the Republican Party nor Republican. Nor have I heard of any high official in the Justice Department who used their office to push a right wing agenda or use anti-Democrat bias. And IF the DOJ tried to charge her, what stopped them? Your statement lacks credibility!
permafrost wrote:
Easy, the republicans/right wingers tried to charge her..
But she was not guilty of any wrong doing.. they fell through their butt..
Even with Gowdy trying to introduce false evidence.. they had nothing but wishes..
20 plus years of pursuing the woman and got nothing..
But you people did prove hate and lies work in politics..
With a little help from Russia, you kept Lady Hillary out of the white house.. all those decades and all those millions of $$$ got that for you..
Now if the liberals will pay attention and see what worked, they can also use that method ...
Easy, the republicans/right wingers tried to charg... (
show quote)
As to your posted sign; WHAT law is being referred to? Please identify it.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.