One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Possible Discrimination Lawsuit?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 11 next> last>>
Jun 26, 2018 12:34:39   #
cbpat1
 
SweetLou wrote:
With incident that occurred concerning Sarah Sanders being asked to leave restaurant because of her work for President Trump,
have question for all with target response from those involved in Civil Rights law/litigation etc...

Can Sarah Sanders file suit for being a victim of discrimination?

Would appreciate informed legal responses.

Thank you,

Sweet Lou




Even though I totally disagree with what the owner did, and I’m a big fan of Sara Huckabee Sanders, I believe, and I may be wrong, but, I think the business has the right to refuse service to anyone it wants to. Now does that make it the right thing to do, I don’t think so, but, I don’t think it was illegal.

Reply
Jun 26, 2018 12:52:24   #
moldyoldy
 
Justsss wrote:
You live in the feckless filth. People like you should be quarantined to a small island to live out your filth by yourself so you don’t infect anyone anymore. Take your hersey highway crap 💩 and shove it where you belong.





There is not much that is new with sex.

The Kama Sutra (/ˈkɑːmə ˈsuːtrə/; Sanskrit: कामसूत्र, pronunciation (help·info), Kāmasūtra) is an ancient Indian Hindu[1][2] text written by Vātsyāyana.[3] It is widely considered to be the standard work on human sexual behaviour in Sanskrit literature.

Lady Chatterley's Lover is a novel by D. H. Lawrence, first published privately in 1928 in Italy, and in 1929 in France and Australia.[1] An unexpurgated edition was not published openly in the United Kingdom until 1960, when it was the subject of a watershed obscenity trial against the publisher Penguin Books. Penguin won the case, and quickly sold 3 million copies.[1] The book was also banned for obscenity in the United States, Canada, Australia, India and Japan. The book soon became notorious for its story of the physical (and emotional) relationship between a working class man and an upper class woman, its explicit descriptions of sex, and its use of then-unprintable words.

Lolita is a 1955 novel written by Russian American novelist Vladimir Nabokov. The novel is notable for its controversial subject: the protagonist and unreliable narrator, a middle-aged literature professor under the pseudonym Humbert Humbert is obsessed with a 12-year-old girl, Dolores Haze, with whom he becomes sexually involved after he becomes her stepfather. "Lolita" is his private nickname for Dolores. The novel was originally written in English and first published in Paris in 1955 by Olympia Press. Later it was translated into Russian by Nabokov himself and published in New York City in 1967 by Phaedra Publishers.

Reply
Jun 26, 2018 13:02:06   #
1ProudAmerican
 
WOW, somebody must not be getting "some"

"This is an automated notice.

Your post inside topic "Possible Discrimination Lawsuit?" was deleted.

Action comment: insult

Deleted post:

kemmer wrote:
Maybe if you stop yapping about how awful the restaurant is, I might stop posting it. Deal?

1ProudAmerican wrote:
Maybe if you stopped yapping like an idiot I wouldn't have to point out your deficiencies.




Just another example of the intolerance of the intolerant PIGS on the left...…

Insult....LOL, LOL, LOL

Reply
 
 
Jun 26, 2018 13:10:09   #
donald41 Loc: puyallup Wa
 
SweetLou wrote:
With incident that occurred concerning Sarah Sanders being asked to leave restaurant because of her work for President Trump,
have question for all with target response from those involved in Civil Rights law/litigation etc...

Can Sarah Sanders file suit for being a victim of discrimination?

Would appreciate informed legal responses.

Thank you,

Sweet Lou


Every man woman and child is suing for every thing, So sure, why not,

Reply
Jun 26, 2018 13:13:38   #
donald41 Loc: puyallup Wa
 
Every one else is sueing some one for something,, So sure go ahead and sue,

Reply
Jun 26, 2018 13:19:23   #
Justsss Loc: Wisconsin
 
[quote=moldyoldy]There is not much that is new with sex.

The Kama Sutra (/ˈkɑːmə ˈsuːtrə/; Sanskrit: कामसूत्र, pronunciation (help·info), Kāmasūtra) is an ancient Indian Hindu

Moldy, that guide has lead to more STD’s & incurable diseases for man than we will ever know.
Just because we have sexual perversion don’t make it ok.
I guess since millions of arab men love goats and sheep that makes that perversion ok also ?

Reply
Jun 26, 2018 13:21:12   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
moldyoldy wrote:
They are discriminating because of sexual orientation. Which is illegal.


No you are wrong they served them in every way and only refused to do their same sex wedding that is all they refused to do They were not discriminating because of sexual orientation !

However the "" gays "" and people like you want to make it look like they were being discriminated against when in fact they didn't want to be a part of a ceremony they considered wrong !

I know , I know it's hard for you all and the ""gays"" to understand how someone can have a problem with same sex marriage and not want to be a part of it !

This is the difference between Conservatives and Liberal leftist they differ in their views of what's right and what's wrong !

Example you all cry about the kids being separated from Mom and Dad but have no problem with unborn babies being removed from their Mother one piece at a time !

Reply
 
 
Jun 26, 2018 13:22:09   #
donald41 Loc: puyallup Wa
 
Sure sue, it is a national past time.

Reply
Jun 26, 2018 13:25:13   #
Justsss Loc: Wisconsin
 
moldyoldy wrote:
They are discriminating because of sexual orientation. Which is illegal.


Moldy, the baker was discriminated against because he has morals and ethics. Something that the mentally ill ( opps that right it’s no longer a mental illness since enough of them got into the profession to change that).

Reply
Jun 26, 2018 13:29:22   #
kemmer
 
4430 wrote:
No you are wrong they served them in every way and only refused to do their same sex wedding that is all they refused to do They were not discriminating because of sexual orientation !

However the "" gays "" and people like you want to make it look like they were being discriminated against when in fact they didn't want to be a part of a ceremony they considered wrong !

I know , I know it's hard for you all and the ""gays"" to understand how someone can have a problem with same sex marriage and not want to be a part of it !

This is the difference between Conservatives and Liberal leftist they differ in their views of what's right and what's wrong !

Example you all cry about the kids being separated from Mom and Dad but have no problem with unborn babies being removed from their Mother one piece at a time !
No you are wrong they served them in every way and... (show quote)


So what happens when a baker refuses an order for a bar mitzvah cake because of course fundamentalists believe all Jews are going to hell at “Armageddon”?

Reply
Jun 26, 2018 13:31:03   #
kemmer
 
Justsss wrote:
Moldy, the baker was discriminated against because he has morals and ethics. Something that the mentally ill ( opps that right it’s no longer a mental illness since enough of them got into the profession to change that).

There’s a difference between morality and subjective morality.

Reply
 
 
Jun 26, 2018 13:43:58   #
Justsss Loc: Wisconsin
 
kemmer wrote:
There’s a difference between morality and subjective morality.


kemmer, you’re very correct. There is a HUGE difference between your subjective morality and the truth of objective morality which is what I stand for. The same applies to the Bakers & Florists & Photographers, etc. that can’t put aside their objective morals & ethics.
Each and every one of these people were happy to serve them except for items or products that become very specific to the immoral behaviors of the
mentally ill.

Reply
Jun 26, 2018 13:48:07   #
kemmer
 
Justsss wrote:
kemmer, you’re very correct. There is a HUGE difference between your subjective morality and the truth of objective morality which is what I stand for. The same applies to the Bakers & Florists & Photographers, etc. that can’t put aside their objective morals & ethics.
Each and every one of these people were happy to serve them except for items or products that become very specific to the immoral behaviors of the
mentally ill.

By ending your polemic with the words “mentally ill”, you just destroyed your whole piece. Congrats.

Reply
Jun 26, 2018 13:54:56   #
moldyoldy
 
Justsss wrote:
kemmer, you’re very correct. There is a HUGE difference between your subjective morality and the truth of objective morality which is what I stand for. The same applies to the Bakers & Florists & Photographers, etc. that can’t put aside their objective morals & ethics.
Each and every one of these people were happy to serve them except for items or products that become very specific to the immoral behaviors of the
mentally ill.



Reply
Jun 26, 2018 13:58:14   #
kemmer
 
Clam chowder and oysters Rockefeller are hellbait as well, don’t forget.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.