One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
trump signs EO saying if you recive wellfair you have to work
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
Apr 13, 2018 11:09:59   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
waltmoreno wrote:
Your response brings to mind the 21 year old woman from Waco Texas.
This, from a 21-year-old female, was in the Waco Tribune Herald in Waco, Texas on November 18, 2010

"Put me in charge . . . "

Put me in charge of food stamps. I’d get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho’s, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza…


…then get a job.

Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I’d do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get tats and piercings, then get a job.

Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks?
You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.

In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the "common good."

Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self-esteem," consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self-esteem.

If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

AND, while you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a government welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job.
Your response brings to mind the 21 year old woman... (show quote)


Put that young lady in charge..

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 11:37:20   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
Dr. Evil wrote:
I've always paid my own way, good times or bad, I wouldn't suck the welfare tit if I was starving, I'm not talking about corporate welfare. I'm talking about citizen leaches. In any regard, I can't do anymore than you, except piss and moan.


I got tired of pissing, and moaning, so I started bitching, and raising hell. Nothing seems to have changed, but I feel better. Sort of........

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 12:24:43   #
Dr. Evil Loc: In Your Face
 
archie bunker wrote:
I got tired of pissing, and moaning, so I started bitching, and raising hell. Nothing seems to have changed, but I feel better. Sort of........

Venting helps, wish it would do more👍

Reply
 
 
Apr 13, 2018 12:47:11   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
Lonewolf wrote:
so the fun starts as his supporters will now have to leave the trailer park and seek employment for the first time lol


I'll bet you'd know how to spell welfare if you weren't a Russian troll.

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 12:53:02   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
buffalo wrote:
She is swallowing camels and gagging on gnats.

Put her in charge of eliminating all the waste, fraud and corporate welfare that goes with US continual, illegal, unConstitutional, immoral warmongering where the real problem is. At least the paltry amount the US spends on social programs actually helps people, especially CHILDREN!


BS. The US spends over a trillion on welfare programs per year. That amounts to over 60,000 per 'poor' family per year. What do taxpayers get in return? More crime and more Dem voters.

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 13:33:31   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Dr. Evil wrote:
I've always paid my own way, good times or bad, I wouldn't suck the welfare tit if I was starving, I'm not talking about corporate welfare. I'm talking about citizen leaches. In any regard, I can't do anymore than you, except piss and moan.


Bullshit! Your gagging on a gnat and swallowing a camel, "doc?" Social welfare to help the poor and elderly is half of what corporate welfare costs the taxpayers. The elderly and poor do not own and control the greedy, self-serving politicians like the corporate elite. Your optic nerve must be connected to your asshole causing you to have a shitty outlook about life.

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 14:19:21   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Voice of Reason wrote:
BS. The US spends over a trillion on welfare programs per year. That amounts to over 60,000 per 'poor' family per year. What do taxpayers get in return? More crime and more Dem voters.


You might want to check this article out before commenting again:

http://thinkbynumbers.org/government-spending/corporate-welfare/corporate-vs-social-welfare/

And this:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/taxanalysts/2014/03/14/where-is-the-outrage-over-corporate-welfare/#3a1b2e3927dd

Reply
 
 
Apr 13, 2018 14:42:36   #
badbob85037
 
Lonewolf wrote:
so the fun starts as his supporters will now have to leave the trailer park and seek employment for the first time lol


Look friend you have to seek some professional help before you end up in some bell tower flinging your crap at the people below.

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 14:43:15   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Dr. Evil wrote:
Your a dick head with a tie to tight, my outlook stems from what I can see, I don't disagree with you, but the poor and elderly could be getting more if it weren't for the rampant fraud. That my beef.


They could be getting a LOT more if the waste and fraud of $6 TRILLION in military spending since 911 were eliminated. I am not against military spending, but goddamn, no one ever seems to rant about the TRILLIONS that can't even be accounted for in a government department that refuses to even be audited, yet, you and many others bitch like hell about the minor amount in social spending caused mostly by incompetent bureaucrats and yet are silent about the huge sums of taxpayer money wasted and frauded in military spending that benefits big military corporations and contractors.

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 15:05:22   #
okie don
 
buffalo wrote:
They could be getting a LOT more if the waste and fraud of $6 TRILLION in military spending since 911 were eliminated. I am not against military spending, but goddamn, no one ever seems to rant about the TRILLIONS that can't even be accounted for in a government department that refuses to even be audited, yet, you and many others bitch like hell about the minor amount in social spending caused mostly by incompetent bureaucrats and yet are silent about the huge sums of taxpayer money wasted and frauded in military spending that benefits big military corporations and contractors.
They could be getting a LOT more if the waste and ... (show quote)

'Rummy' mentioned the $trillion +$ unaccounted for the day before 9-11-01as you may recall. The missile happened to strike the exact area where the review personnel were trying to account for the lost money that mysteriously disappeared!

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 15:10:02   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
okie don wrote:
'Rummy' mentioned the $trillion +$ unaccounted for the day before 9-11-01as you may recall. The missile happened to strike the exact area where the review personnel were trying to account for the lost money that mysteriously disappeared!


What a convenient coincidence...or tragedy depending on one's perspective, eh? Yet, it hasn't changed, has it?

Reply
 
 
Apr 13, 2018 16:00:31   #
king hall Loc: Tucson,AZ.
 
Lonewolf wrote:
funny az started a drug testing program and after a year they found 3 people that failed the test and saved the taxpayers 3.600 dollars while costing taxpayers 1 1/2 million for the testing.


that's a true story

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 16:06:06   #
old marine Loc: America home of the brave
 
Dr. Evil wrote:
You must be referring to women with 9 kids and 3 fathers (Democrat leaches).





Semper Fi

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 16:06:53   #
king hall Loc: Tucson,AZ.
 
Lonewolf wrote:
trump just gave himself a billion dollar tax break at the expense of the middle class he also removed protections that Obama put in place to keep the banks from failing to get ready for the big recession that he's bringing on. runs the nation's debt up 1.9 trillion so your great grand kids can pay off.
and has managed to convince you that the problems of the nation are caused by the people on the bottom who might get 4,300 a year
the people trump will hurt the most are his base that cheers him for their own demise!
if we just stopped bombing for a few days the savings would pay for all the social programs.
trump just gave himself a billion dollar tax break... (show quote)


so you're suggesting the D.O.D. would share its savings with...oh? Catholic Charities.
DREAMER

Reply
Apr 13, 2018 16:14:18   #
king hall Loc: Tucson,AZ.
 
waltmoreno wrote:
Your response brings to mind the 21 year old woman from Waco Texas.
This, from a 21-year-old female, was in the Waco Tribune Herald in Waco, Texas on November 18, 2010

"Put me in charge . . . "

Put me in charge of food stamps. I’d get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho’s, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza…


…then get a job.

Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I’d do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get tats and piercings, then get a job.

Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks?
You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.

In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the "common good."

Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self-esteem," consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self-esteem.

If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

AND, while you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a government welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job.
Your response brings to mind the 21 year old woman... (show quote)


She sounds like she might be related to Sarah Palin. I hope she's doing well

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.