banjojack wrote:
By dubious and suspect, that means anyone who dares to disagree with you in any particular on anything? US News and World Report is wrong, NBC News is wrong, I could have included the statistics from the US Bureau of Statistics, but why bother? They are wrong, too, because they have the temerity to contradict your biases. You have offered no facts or truth, you have merely dismissed source after source proving you wrong as being suspect.
Sir your arrogance is amazing! I noticed that you haven't mentioned any links that I have provided. Could it be that you are guilty of the indiscretions that you accuse me of! I didn't say they were wrong, I said they was suspect and I still say it. I take it that you are not biased! BS! You haven't proved anything all of it is perception although mine is more accurate than yours! We agree to disagree although two diametrically opposed opinions both cannot be right! Somebody's incorrect and we both know who that is! Time will tell!