One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
AR 15 knock offs
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Feb 17, 2018 00:10:26   #
teabag09
 
NFW, Mike
Larry the Legend wrote:
You mean like the 3-day waiting period we all must serve now before picking up our legal purchase? Or should I surrender my firearms to the local police station and give them 3 days' notice that I would please like to borrow my guns for a day at the range? Or perhaps I should be accompanied by a qualified police officer at all times when firearm is in my possession? You know, just in case...

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 08:09:59   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Ooopsies!


I am glad to say, the princiles expressed by that word are some which I hold dear..

I want to congratulate you on you ability to so quickly recognize and appreciate the complicated and convoluted expression of this wonderful new word..

I did it and I am proud..

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 08:17:50   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Nice try.

Actual weapons used in those tragedies:

Aurora - M&P15
Orlando - Sig Sauer MCX
Las Vegas - 23 weapons and accessories, none were AR-15
Sandy hook - Bushmaster .223
Texas church - Ruger AR-556
San Bernadino - AR-15
Parkland - AR-15 Variant (not AR-15)

Congratulations, you got one right. I'll round that off to 14.3%. Even allowing for the Ruger and the Variant, you still don't top 50%.

So tell me again about all those hundreds of casualties caused by the AR-15.
Nice try. br br Actual weapons used in those trag... (show quote)





Darn, I hate it when I am not 100% correct, but you are either..

This from time.com should be more accurate..

http://time.com/5160355/ar-15-rifle-florida-parkland-school-shooting/

Six of the 10 deadliest mass shootings in the U.S. over the past decade have used an AR-15-style semi-automatic rifle. The latest instance was Wednesday’s high school shooting in Parkland, Florida, which left 17 dead and 14 others injured.

The gun used in the shooting was a Smith and Wesson M&P AR-15, federal law enforcement officials told the Associated Press. The same model weapon was used in previous mass shootings, including the Aurora, Colo., movie theater shooting that claimed 12 lives and the rampage in San Bernardino, Calif., that claimed 14.

These rifles and other versions of the AR-15 are the civilian equivalent of fully-automatic M16 rifles used by the U.S. military since the Vietnam War. They are fancied by gun owners because they are typically easy to purchase — often for less than $1,000 — and can be customized with a number of accessories, such as bump stocks, which essentially convert the semi-automatic weapons into fully-automatics. A bump stock was deployed by the assailant in the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, which left 58 dead, making it the deadliest mass shooting in modern American history.

Up until that point, the country’s deadliest mass shooting had occurred just a year prior at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, where the perpetrator used an SIG MCX semi-automatic rifle — highly similar to AR-15s in aesthetic and purpose — to kill 49 people. Comparable weapons were also used at Sandy Hook Elementary School (27 dead) and a Sutherland Springs, Texas, church (25 dead).

The high number of fatalities in these incidents highlight how AR-15-style guns, much like their M16 cousin, are capable of inflicting serious damage to a number of people at once.

“For practical purposes, for the person that’s just tuning in, the non-gun owner, it’s a very similar type of firearm,” Rob Pincus, who has made a career out of training armed professionals, told TIME.

A debate over whether civilians should have access to these weapons has been ongoing for years. In 2013, in the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting, an assault weapons ban was introduced in Congress, but was struck down by a vote of 40 to 60. It would have barred the “sale, transfer, manufacturing and importation” of customizable semi-automatic rifles like the AR-15.

Reply
 
 
Feb 17, 2018 08:35:56   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
What makes you think that I am forgetting the victims of mass shootings? It breaks my heart every time something like this happens.

My point is to put you leftists' emotional overreaction to these sorts of crimes in perspective. Not only do you make the gun the culprit, you single out one type of firearm as if it is the greatest killing machine in history, and yet you expect any reasonable person to take you seriously? So far this February, 62 people have been shot in Chicago, 16 killed, all by perps with handguns. Doesn't matter what kind of gun it is, what it looks like, what color it is, whether it is long or short, how many bullets it shoots, the gun is not the problem. My guns, including my AR15, are perfectly harmless until I pick one up and tell it to do something.

I simply cannot abide the irrational idea that banning one type of firearm is going to curtail any sort of violent crime. Eliminate the AR15 and another type of firearm will take its place. These kinds of tragedies will go on until the real problems, the causes, not the effects, the diseases, not the symptoms, are dealt with. And that is going to require a hell of lot more extremely difficult effort than just passing a string of useless laws through congress. Putting bandaids on headaches doesn't work.
What makes you think that I am forgetting the vict... (show quote)




I tend to agree with much of what you and Loki have to say.. so maybe we should go back to trying to ban handguns.. Remember all the noise about "Saturday night specials"?

So, correct banning Assault style guns will not stop shootings. But perhaps would reduce them.. The Clinton law of the 90s was pretty successful. How often did we deal with mass killings back then?

It is no longer possible to ban these guns, millions of the floating around according to most sources..

So, If we accept that banning an particular type of gun would be pointless, what shall we do?

Accept the killing of bunch of kids now and then as a price of gun ownership.. Maybe the equivalent of a "carbon tax" on these firearms? Calculate the probable cost of all funerals and recovery cost of wounded,

add that cost to purchase price of the style of gun or all guns and provide free funerals for all victims??

we are a fine and proud nation, it is unthinkable that we do nothing at all about all the gun deaths.. Some regulations must be made, along with enforcement...

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 08:46:56   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
teabag09 wrote:
I totally disagree, my Daughters Principle took it upon himself, in the 80's, to arm his high school with Asst. Principles including himself. All went or had gone through extreme training. Also stops at all doors and check ins. Mike



I find the idea of armed teachers to be only a step down from a guarded prison..

If we address only the school shooting/killings, I think the construction of the two door controlled entry would be cheaper and much more practical than hired or volunteer armed guards..

very few teacher would be suited mentally to have guns on hand and the presence of gun in a class room would have more not less damage and injury to students and staff.

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 09:03:14   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Our leftist friends just won't admit their number one goal. Ban all guns!
teabag09 wrote:
Salty, how are you going to suggest that AR's are gotten rid of? The production and sale could be stopped right now and you'd still have over 2 or more million out there. There's no way to confiscate them.

It isn't the gun, I can take a shotgun with an 18" barrel with no. 1 buck (24/1/4" pellets) and kill a WHOLE classroom of people with probably 3 or 4 shots.

You are right, the AR-15 or 10 are devastating weapons when used for evil but a pump or semi-auto shotgun would be twice as devastating.

Again, it's not the gun it's the way our culture has been changed and you, for one, have gone along with the change without doing any real input into your thought process. Again it's not the GUN but the system. This latest shooter was referred to the FBI and Sheriffs department 39 time as being unstable. No follow up. We've taken respect for authority whether it's parents, teachers, law enforcement, pastoral or one on one out of the equation. That, Sir is the problem, NOT THE GUN. It is merely an instrument. It is what stands behind the INSTRUMENT that is the problem.

The sooner you leftist idiots get that in your head and quit fighting us who are trying to get our Country back on kilter the quicker you will see this crap stop happening. Mike
Salty, how are you going to suggest that AR's are ... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 12:31:18   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
permafrost wrote:
I tend to agree with much of what you and Loki have to say.. so maybe we should go back to trying to ban handguns.. Remember all the noise about "Saturday night specials"?

So, correct banning Assault style guns will not stop shootings. But perhaps would reduce them.. The Clinton law of the 90s was pretty successful. How often did we deal with mass killings back then?

It is no longer possible to ban these guns, millions of the floating around according to most sources..

So, If we accept that banning an particular type of gun would be pointless, what shall we do?

Accept the killing of bunch of kids now and then as a price of gun ownership.. Maybe the equivalent of a "carbon tax" on these firearms? Calculate the probable cost of all funerals and recovery cost of wounded,

add that cost to purchase price of the style of gun or all guns and provide free funerals for all victims??

we are a fine and proud nation, it is unthinkable that we do nothing at all about all the gun deaths.. Some regulations must be made, along with enforcement...
I tend to agree with much of what you and Loki hav... (show quote)


The Clinton ban had absolutely NO effect, none, on shootings, mass or otherwise. We were already in a downward trend that continued unaffected by the so called ban. Millions of rifles and tens of millions of magazines. Rots of Ruck with that one. I have yet to hear a Liberal explain why our murder rate has been cut in half in the past 20 years, in spite of having 40 million more people, 100 million more firearms in private hands, and the issuance of more than 12 million carry permits. You call us troglodytes and say we see boogers behind every bush, yet in Texas in 2013, the last year I was able to obtain data, out of 497 convictions for murder and manslaughter, ONE was a permit holder. Here in GA after issuing more than 600,000 carry permits, barely one hundred have been convicted of a firearms crime. We are talking a tiny fraction of one percent here. Permit holders are among the most law abiding people in the world.
It is the same with semi-autos. Twenty years ago when the murder rate was far higher and revolvers were the weapon of choice, all the talk was banning handguns. Now revolvers are politically correct; not because they have become less deadly, but because they have become less popular. Check the FBI's Uniform Crime Report; you will find that mass shootings notwithstanding, more people are killed every year with knives than with those evil awful semi-autos. The same can be said for clubs. Not just semi-auto rifles, but ALL rifles and shotguns. Let's hear it for banning knives, baseball bats and pipe wrenches.

Reply
 
 
Feb 17, 2018 12:32:17   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
permafrost wrote:
I find the idea of armed teachers to be only a step down from a guarded prison..

If we address only the school shooting/killings, I think the construction of the two door controlled entry would be cheaper and much more practical than hired or volunteer armed guards..

very few teacher would be suited mentally to have guns on hand and the presence of gun in a class room would have more not less damage and injury to students and staff.


I'll be damned. We actually agree on something.

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 12:33:50   #
bahmer
 
Loki wrote:
The Clinton ban had absolutely NO effect, none, on shootings, mass or otherwise. We were already in a downward trend that continued unaffected by the so called ban. Millions of rifles and tens of millions of magazines. Rots of Ruck with that one. I have yet to hear a Liberal explain why our murder rate has been cut in half in the past 20 years, in spite of having 40 million more people, 100 million more firearms in private hands, and the issuance of more than 12 million carry permits. You call us troglodytes and say we see boogers behind every bush, yet in Texas in 2013, the last year I was able to obtain data, out of 497 convictions for murder and manslaughter, ONE was a permit holder. Here in GA after issuing more than 600,000 carry permits, barely one hundred have been convicted of a firearms crime. We are talking a tiny fraction of one percent here. Permit holders are among the most law abiding people in the world.
It is the same with semi-autos. Twenty years ago when the murder rate was far higher and revolvers were the weapon of choice, all the talk was banning handguns. Now revolvers are politically correct; not because they have become less deadly, but because they have become less popular. Check the FBI's Uniform Crime Report; you will find that mass shootings notwithstanding, more people are killed every year with knives than with those evil awful semi-autos. The same can be said for clubs. Not just semi-auto rifles, but ALL rifles and shotguns. Let's hear it for banning knives, baseball bats and pipe wrenches.
The Clinton ban had absolutely NO effect, none, on... (show quote)


As well as automobiles and trucks both small and large and then don't forget to ban trains and airplanes as well especially the small privately owned airplanes.

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 13:03:46   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Loki wrote:
I'll be damned. We actually agree on something.




Wow,,

Perhaps goodness still dwells in the heart of man..

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 13:07:14   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
permafrost wrote:
Wow,,

Perhaps goodness still dwells in the heart of man..

More like appreciation of a sensible suggestion regarding school doors.

Reply
 
 
Feb 17, 2018 13:09:31   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Loki wrote:
The Clinton ban had absolutely NO effect, none, on shootings, mass or otherwise. We were already in a downward trend that continued unaffected by the so called ban. Millions of rifles and tens of millions of magazines. Rots of Ruck with that one. I have yet to hear a Liberal explain why our murder rate has been cut in half in the past 20 years, in spite of having 40 million more people, 100 million more firearms in private hands, and the issuance of more than 12 million carry permits. You call us troglodytes and say we see boogers behind every bush, yet in Texas in 2013, the last year I was able to obtain data, out of 497 convictions for murder and manslaughter, ONE was a permit holder. Here in GA after issuing more than 600,000 carry permits, barely one hundred have been convicted of a firearms crime. We are talking a tiny fraction of one percent here. Permit holders are among the most law abiding people in the world.
It is the same with semi-autos. Twenty years ago when the murder rate was far higher and revolvers were the weapon of choice, all the talk was banning handguns. Now revolvers are politically correct; not because they have become less deadly, but because they have become less popular. Check the FBI's Uniform Crime Report; you will find that mass shootings notwithstanding, more people are killed every year with knives than with those evil awful semi-autos. The same can be said for clubs. Not just semi-auto rifles, but ALL rifles and shotguns. Let's hear it for banning knives, baseball bats and pipe wrenches.
The Clinton ban had absolutely NO effect, none, on... (show quote)




Ultimately, the research concluded that it was “premature to make definitive assessments of the ban’s impact on gun crime,” largely because the law’s grandfathering of millions of pre-ban assault weapons and large-capacity magazines “ensured that the effects of the law would occur only gradually” and were “still unfolding” when the ban expired in 2004.



the only conclusive information i can find is that it will be a cold day before any gun legislation get passed again..

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 13:11:24   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Loki wrote:
More like appreciation of a sensible suggestion regarding school doors.


what seems so good to some of us does not even get a mention by those proposing measures that could help..

glad we agree on this..

Reply
Feb 17, 2018 15:01:06   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
permafrost wrote:
what seems so good to some of us does not even get a mention by those proposing measures that could help..

glad we agree on this..


It offers protection without stepping on the toes of the law abiding.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.