One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
How Can Anyone Defend the "Shit Hole" Comments?
Page <<first <prev 27 of 30 next> last>>
Jan 18, 2018 12:56:35   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Super Dave wrote:
He's already backed up the starting point.

Trump extended the unconstitutional DACA that Obama passed. Now he's already promising to give amnesty to DACAers , which was not at all what he campaigned on.

I'm not saying others might not have done worst (some more than others), but he is backing down.


Anything signed yet?

Reply
Jan 18, 2018 13:04:55   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
One mans backing down is another's negotiation. Personally I believe in no amnesty. But the Dem's have been much better with their allies in the press in convincing the American sheeple that we somehow benefit from all these illegals. Boggles the mind. I'll hold my nose and take amnesty for the thievers with no more chain migration and refugee lottery over straight amnesty. Spineless Republicans.
Super Dave wrote:
He's already backed up the starting point.

Trump extended the unconstitutional DACA that Obama passed. Now he's already promising to give amnesty to DACAers , which was not at all what he campaigned on.

I'm not saying others might not have done worst (some more than others), but he is backing down.

Reply
Jan 18, 2018 13:06:52   #
S. Maturin
 
teabag09 wrote:
If you haven't been to any of those Countries you wouldn't realize that he is exactly right. Probably could have worded it better but they are "Shit Holes". Mike


That is so perfectly stated, not much could possibly added.

However, we must note that one of those shitholes- Haiti- was a goldmine for the Clintons.

Reply
Jan 18, 2018 13:13:12   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
S. Maturin wrote:
That is so perfectly stated, not much could possibly added.

However, we must note that one of those shitholes- Haiti- was a goldmine for the Clintons.


Yep.

And CNN continues it's pathetic agenda against Trump.



Reply
Jan 18, 2018 15:52:59   #
moose
 
DURBIN IS A LYING LIBERAL A-H--E.HE SHOULD BE KICKED OUT OF CONGRESS FOR GOOD.HE DID THE SAME THING IN 2013 AGAINST A DEM PRES.I TELL YOU I'M SICK OF THESE LYING SWAMP CREATURES.WE NEED TO VOTE ALL THESE DEMS OUT OF CONGRESS AND ABOUT 10 RINO REPUBLICANS

Reply
Jan 18, 2018 15:58:14   #
moose
 
SCHUMER AND PELOSI AND THE REST OF THE DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS WOULD RATHER TAKE CARE OF THE DACA ILLEGALS THEN TAKE OF OUR MILITARY MEN AND WOMEN WHO PROTECT US AND OUR COUNTRY.I HOPE MOST OF THE PEOPLE OUT THERE SEE HOW THESE IDIOTS ACT AND KICK THEIR ASSES OUT OF OFFICE THIS YR.THESE DEMOCRATS ARE SOCIALISTS AND COMMUNISTS WHEN YOU PUT ILLEGALS AHEAD OF YOUR OWN PEOPLE.FIRED THEM ALL.THEY ARE DIDGUSTING AND USELESS

Reply
Jan 18, 2018 17:25:54   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Anything signed yet?
Yes.

He personally signed an Executive Order to extend the unconstitutional DACA priviledges to illegals.

Didn't you know that?

Reply
 
 
Jan 18, 2018 17:27:26   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
JFlorio wrote:
One mans backing down is another's negotiation. Personally I believe in no amnesty. But the Dem's have been much better with their allies in the press in convincing the American sheeple that we somehow benefit from all these illegals. Boggles the mind. I'll hold my nose and take amnesty for the thievers with no more chain migration and refugee lottery over straight amnesty. Spineless Republicans.
I'm not saying he get an ok deal. But he isn't even asking for what he campaigned on.

Reply
Jan 18, 2018 17:58:29   #
Homestead
 
Super Dave wrote:
Yes.

He personally signed an Executive Order to extend the unconstitutional DACA priviledges to illegals.

Didn't you know that?


Try to keep up.

Federal court blocks Trump plan to end Daca program for immigrants

US district judge William Alsup rules the Dreamers program must remain in place while litigation over Trump’s decision unfolds
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/10/judge-blocks-trump-dreamers-daca-program-immigrants

Reply
Jan 18, 2018 18:06:59   #
vettelover Loc: Richmond Va
 
lindajoy wrote:
DACA wasn’t even legal, but no one on the left objected then ... Now it’s racist to remove them ?? Under what authority were they brought here again??

Trump has tried to get Congress to get something from them but the upcoming elections and not wanting to lose their job if they move to remove these people rules instead.. Pathetic really..

Now most of these people are adults and vote dems to keep themself here and getting whatever assistance they may be getting..That’s what dems need they aren’t about to put them out...
DACA wasn’t even legal, but no one on the left obj... (show quote)



The Democrats and their Rino enablers are being allowed to IGNORE the laws of the United States and they are urinating on the Bill of Rights!

If they want open borders, then sponsor a bill to open the borders, which of course destroys any sovereignty we once had and change the law. For now, its against the law to be here without documentation. ENFORCE THE LAWS THAT ARE CURRENTLY ON THE BOOKS!!

Reply
Jan 18, 2018 18:26:22   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Super Dave wrote:
I'm not saying he get an ok deal. But he isn't even asking for what he campaigned on.


I'm sure it is very difficult to negotiate anything with the threat of leaks threatening every bit of needed privacy any real negotiation needs. The leaks are undermining Trump as much as anything.

Reply
Jan 18, 2018 22:00:09   #
kankune Loc: Iowa
 
lindajoy wrote:
DACA wasn’t even legal, but no one on the left objected then ... Now it’s racist to remove them ?? Under what authority were they brought here again??

Trump has tried to get Congress to get something from them but the upcoming elections and not wanting to lose their job if they move to remove these people rules instead.. Pathetic really..

Now most of these people are adults and vote dems to keep themself here and getting whatever assistance they may be getting..That’s what dems need they aren’t about to put them out...
DACA wasn’t even legal, but no one on the left obj... (show quote)


Why can't we just say if they've been working for a steady 7 years they can stay. If they're in college with a B average they can stay. If they are in the service they can stay. The rest go back to where they came from. Chances are they're draining the taxpayers dry, they're in a gang, or they have a criminal record. Those illegal aliens don't help or do our country any good.

Reply
Jan 18, 2018 22:32:53   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
kankune wrote:
Why can't we just say if they've been working for a steady 7 years they can stay. If they're in college with a B average they can stay. If they are in the service they can stay. The rest go back to where they came from. Chances are they're draining the taxpayers dry, they're in a gang, or they have a criminal record. Those illegal aliens don't help or do our country any good.


It’s about way more than legalizing some of the schemers.

It’s about chain migration and the Visa lottery. If we don’t put an end to this might as well give the country to Mexico.

Reply
Jan 18, 2018 23:11:42   #
kankune Loc: Iowa
 
JFlorio wrote:
It’s about way more than legalizing some of the schemers.

It’s about chain migration and the Visa lottery. If we don’t put an end to this might as well give the country to Mexico.


I'm hoping that chain migration and the visa lotto are a given. Done....finaaaa....outtta there....

Reply
Jan 19, 2018 00:10:19   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Oh no. This is just what the Democrats want. Along with those traitor's Graham, McCain, and Flake. Also the Dem's want an additional 3.2 million young illegals not under DACHA to o stay.
kankune wrote:
I'm hoping that chain migration and the visa lotto are a given. Done....finaaaa....outtta there....

Reply
Page <<first <prev 27 of 30 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.