Nickolai wrote:
We need a law-- any thug found with a loaded gun in his possession he be executed on the spot with the gun
I'm all for that, but first we'll have to define exactly what qualifies one as a thug.
archie bunker wrote:
I'm all for that, but first we'll have to define exactly what qualifies one as a thug.
Don’t let liberals define it. You and I’d be history. Hate speech en all.
JFlorio wrote:
Don’t let liberals define it. You and I’d be history. Hate speech en all.
I consider everything posted by Nicolidealess to be hate speech. I'm sure he does me too. So, who is right? What IS 'hate speech'?
archie bunker wrote:
I consider everything posted by Nicolidealess to be hate speech. I'm sure he does me too. So, who is right? What IS 'hate speech'?
I have know idea. When I grew up hate speech was someone usually, a girl coming up to me and saying I hate you!
Bad Bob wrote:
Newsflash a lot of stupid people have guns and are still stupid.
A lot of stupid people don't have guns and are still stupid. You have an opportunity here, BB, you can be the poster boy.
Blade_Runner wrote:
A lot of stupid people don't have guns and are still stupid. You have an opportunity here, BB, you can be the poster boy.
Somebody with your name already has that position.
Bad Bob wrote:
Who said it would be?
This is what you said
Arch just like your car the owner is held responsible for what happens. Guns should be the same.
I was merely saying that it is not always that certain car owners fault.
kankune wrote:
This is what you said
Arch just like your car the owner is held responsible for what happens. Guns should be the same.
I was merely saying that it is not always that certain car owners fault.
No "Arch just like your car the owner is held responsible for what happens. Guns should be the same."
Kankune if your child took your gun and shot his little friend, you would be held responsible.
Bad Bob wrote:
No "Arch just like your car the owner is held responsible for what happens. Guns should be the same."
Kankune if your child took your gun and shot his little friend, you would be held responsible.
Bob, I'm willing to bet you folding money that Kankune would never leave a gun anywhere that a child could get to it.
archie bunker wrote:
Bob, I'm willing to bet you folding money that Kankune would never leave a gun anywhere that a child could get to it.
Sorry but I would never make a bet on that, Powerball maybe. Poker
Bad Bob wrote:
No "Arch just like your car the owner is held responsible for what happens. Guns should be the same."
Kankune if your child took your gun and shot his little friend, you would be held responsible.
Of course I would in that instance, altho I'm not idiot enough to ever leave my gun where my child would of gotten it in the first place. If you're stopped at a stop sign and someone hits you from behind, just because you own the car you're in doesn't mean it was your fault.
archie bunker wrote:
Bob, I'm willing to bet you folding money that Kankune would never leave a gun anywhere that a child could get to it.
Thx Arch. Always had guns when my kids were growing up. Always...always...were they put up under lock and key. When they were old enough they were taught how to respect a gun and how to use them responsibly.
archie bunker wrote:
Wow! I've never even heard of the idea of a suppressor for a black powder rifle.
Nobody but an ignorant liberal would put the two together. Sort of like claiming a five pound Colt 1847 44 caliber revolver can be used as a concealed weapon. Talking about subjects of which they know nothing.
Semper Fi
DJRich wrote:
Killing cops is not troubling to you?
OK, no point in asking you for a solution
Drivers of automobiles kill, knives, machetes, axes, hammers, rope,
if somebody wants to kill they are going to find a way.
No gun zones only a magnet.
Strict gun ownership not working.
Maybe something in the educational system would help.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.