One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Where is the "good guy with a gun"?
Page <<first <prev 13 of 14 next>
Nov 10, 2017 07:30:30   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
I've read all the liberals post here and it's clear as to what they want done with guns.

First ban all semi-automatic guns once that has happened then pick another type of gun and hammer on that one and soon all guns will be made illegal and that will according to their idea then killing will stop and bingo we all will live in peace and harmony !

Diana Fienstein said if everyone would turn in their guns then the criminal will turn his in as well as that is just human nature to do so .

Reply
Nov 10, 2017 07:44:29   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
Yeah, you got the liberals pegged perfectly, but the flaw in what they think and want is shown in the reality that 90% of all gun crimes and murders are committed by the liberal Democratic criminals that they have already banned from possessing and owning guns, yet the liberals are incapable of enforcing those laws and take away their criminal cohorts' guns. So instead of enforcing the gun ban laws already on the books, that would make the USA and it's people 90% safer than we are today, they want to deny law abiding citizens of their 2nd Amendment Right, to make us the next probable vicitms of their cohort liberal Democratic criminals, for which they are incapable of enforcing their laws already on the books, so can't keep guns from those crimionals.



4430 wrote:
I've read all the liberals post here and it's clear as to what they want done with guns.

First ban all semi-automatic guns once that has happened then pick another type of gun and hammer on that one and soon all guns will be made illegal and that will according to their idea then killing will stop and bingo we all will live in peace and harmony !

Diana Fienstein said if everyone would turn in their guns then the criminal will turn his in as well as that is just human nature to do so .
I've read all the liberals post here and it's clea... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 10, 2017 07:52:43   #
PeterS
 
Randy131 wrote:
Yeah, you're right, you missed it. It says, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear 'Arms', shall not be infringed." Do you understand what that means? It means not just some specific type of Arms, but all Arms that can be beared, or carried by any person. Is that too hard to understand, and since we are incapable of carrying a tank, the right to bear tanks can be infringed upon, and that also to bear cannons or other artillary that are also incapble of being beared, which may help explain that Right a little further.
Yeah, you're right, you missed it. It says, "... (show quote)


So by that logic a suit case nuke would be legal but Cannon illegal? Do you really think that's what the founders intended???

Reply
 
 
Nov 10, 2017 08:50:43   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO
 
Randy131 wrote:
Yeah, you got the liberals pegged perfectly, but the flaw in what they think and want is shown in the reality that 90% of all gun crimes and murders are committed by the liberal Democratic criminals that they have already banned from possessing and owning guns, yet the liberals are incapable of enforcing those laws and take away their criminal cohorts' guns. So instead of enforcing the gun ban laws already on the books, that would make the USA and it's people 90% safer than we are today, they want to deny law abiding citizens of their 2nd Amendment Right, to make us the next probable vicitms of their cohort liberal Democratic criminals, for which they are incapable of enforcing their laws already on the books, so can't keep guns from those crimionals.
Yeah, you got the liberals pegged perfectly, but t... (show quote)


Spot on Randy! I have noticed reading many of your well thought out posts rife with fact and figures, it goes right over the heads of our committed libtoid, (rhymes with hemorrhoid) trolls heads. That being said I have also noticed many of your posts are quite lengthy in content. Just a word to the wise, most libs attention span and reading comprehension is quite short, and they are totally baffled after the first sentence or two, resulting in complete confusion that they invariably stop reading, and fail to grasp to the meat of your post. Of course they weren't intent on doing that in the first place, simply because it goes against the grain of their Constitution and America hating ideology.

Semper Fi

Reply
Nov 10, 2017 11:03:19   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
The founders intended the American people to be armed just as well as it's government, in the case that some time in the future, we would have to do what they did and professed in our 'Declaration of Independence', which people like you trying to usurp our rights as listed in the 'Bill of Rights' and the US Constitution's first ten amandments, is moving us pretty close for the reasons that the 'Declaration of Independence' was written.

Since you couldn't understand what our 2nd Amendment meant, maybe you should read and study our 'Declaration of Independence' more than one time over. As far as your "suit case nuke" (suitcase) scenario is concerned, it is against the law for common Americans to own refined uranium, because it is deadly dangerous for people to be around it, unlike guns are in the hands of responsible law abiding citizens.

So your scenaio is already against the law, because of the endangering substance it consists of for people just being near it.

Since you like soapboxes so much, why not use it to get your lazy liberal asses to enforce our legal gun ban on criminals, who are committing 90% of the gun crimes and murders in the USA, instead of attacking the law abiding American people over their legal rights? But I guess if you succeded in that you would actually achieve saving tens of thousands of lives every year, without violating law abiding citizens rights, but then you would have to give up your soapbox antics, because there would then be no more lives you could claim to save if people just did what you want to force them to do, and without good and logical reasons.


PeterS wrote:
So by that logic a suit case nuke would be legal but Cannon illegal? Do you really think that's what the founders intended???

Reply
Nov 10, 2017 11:09:26   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO
 
Randy131 wrote:
The founders intended the American people to be armed just as well as it's government, in the case that some time in the future, we would have to do what they did and professed in our 'Declaration of Independence', which people like you trying to usurp our rights as listed in the 'Bill of Rights' and the US Constitution's first ten amandments, is moving us pretty close for the reasons that the 'Declaration of Independence' was written.

Since you couldn't understand what our 2nd Amendment meant, maybe you should read and study our 'Declaration of Independence' more than one time over. As far as your "suit case nuke" (suitcase) scenario is concerned, it is against the law for common Americans to own refined uranium, because it is deadly dangerous for people to be around it, unlike guns are in the hands of responsible law abiding citizens.

So your scenaio is already against the law, because of the endangering substance it consists of for people just being near it.

Since you like soapboxes so much, why not use it to get your lazy liberal asses to enforce our legal gun ban on criminals, who are committing 90% of the gun crimes and murders in the USA, instead of attacking the law abiding American people over their legal rights? But I guess if you succeded in that you would actually achieved saving tens of thousands of lives every year, without violating law abiding citizens rights, but then you would have to give up your soapbox antics, because there would then be no more lives you could claim to save if people just did what you want to force them to do, and without good and logical reasons.
The founders intended the American people to be ar... (show quote)


Semper Fi & Happy Birthday to my beloved Corps!

Reply
Nov 10, 2017 11:10:47   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
You're probably right Jake, but it gives them a chance to lie and say it's too long to read, after they've already read it, but can't come up with any sensible rebuttal, and allows them to save a little face, which what they're always espousing, they need to be able to save as much face as they can, since most of what they say is either BS, propaganda, or lies. I try to be nice to retards, their condition isn't their fault, it's their great need for indoctrination to be able to believe in something, since independent thinking is so very hard on them.

Semper Fidelis my brother, and "HAPPY BIRTHDAY".



Jakebrake wrote:
Spot on Randy! I have noticed reading many of your well thought out posts rife with fact and figures, it goes right over the heads of our committed libtoid, (rhymes with hemorrhoid) trolls heads. That being said I have also noticed many of your posts are quite lengthy in content. Just a word to the wise, most libs attention span and reading comprehension is quite short, and they are totally baffled after the first sentence or two, resulting in complete confusion that they invariably stop reading, and fail to grasp to the meat of your post. Of course they weren't intent on doing that in the first place, simply because it goes against the grain of their Constitution and America hating ideology.

Semper Fi
Spot on Randy! I have noticed reading many of you... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Nov 10, 2017 11:42:09   #
teabag09
 
Back in the 70s at a party someone had loaded a joint with pcp. That is some really dangerous stuff. I was messed up for 3 days. That stuff is worst than blue dot. Mike
BigMike wrote:
He's smoking angel dust if he's smoking anything. That stuff makes you violent...and delusional.

The stuff I smoke, on the other hand (Snowbud at the moment ), doesn't turn people sociopathic.

Reply
Nov 10, 2017 12:15:39   #
eden
 
JW wrote:
Liberals are incensed that people kill themselves with guns... but staunchly support abortion. Apparently it's fine to abort those who have no choice but terrible to choose to abort yourself.

Liberals support euthanasia and physician assisted suicide... but doing it without a medical bill is not tolerable.

Liberals support recreational drug use even knowing its debilitating effects on the brain... but doing it quickly with a bullet is somehow just wrong.

It would be much easier to take Liberals seriously if they weren't such damned hypocrites.
Liberals are incensed that people kill themselves ... (show quote)


Seems like I’ve never met one of these fantasy “Liberals” you describe. Or is it just that you’ve created a cardboard villain nasty enough to fit your tribal narrative so you can feel safe in your little mental gun garrison?

Reply
Nov 10, 2017 13:38:51   #
JW
 
eden wrote:
Seems like I’ve never met one of these fantasy “Liberals” you describe. Or is it just that you’ve created a cardboard villain nasty enough to fit your tribal narrative so you can feel safe in your little mental gun garrison?


Actually, eden, I used to be one of you... well, not actually one of you. I was, and still consider myself to be, a JFK Democrat. Like Pres. Reagan said, I never left the Democrat party, they left me. I know your kind well. What I described is hardly a fantasy Liberal and, were you to address that posting honestly, you would admit readily recognizing the type.

I do own a small caliber rifle but other than that, nothing. I do know how to use it, the Marine Corps taught me how but I am not a gun enthusiast. I am a liberty enthusiast. I am also an aficionado of logic. Liberty requires the ability to meaningfully oppose tyranny and logic tells me that disarming the lawful means only the lawless will be armed. If we can't defend ourselves against the lawless, how can we possibly defend against tyrants.

Rather than my actually being confined to a "little mental gun garrison", that is probably only how it looks from your little mental security bunker.

Reply
Nov 10, 2017 14:57:05   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
PeterS wrote:
That's why eliminating semi automatic weapons is the only approach that will work...


How will it work?

Reply
 
 
Nov 10, 2017 16:52:20   #
vettelover Loc: Richmond Va
 
Jakebrake wrote:
Spot on Randy! I have noticed reading many of your well thought out posts rife with fact and figures, it goes right over the heads of our committed libtoid, (rhymes with hemorrhoid) trolls heads. That being said I have also noticed many of your posts are quite lengthy in content. Just a word to the wise, most libs attention span and reading comprehension is quite short, and they are totally baffled after the first sentence or two, resulting in complete confusion that they invariably stop reading, and fail to grasp to the meat of your post. Of course they weren't intent on doing that in the first place, simply because it goes against the grain of their Constitution and America hating ideology.

Semper Fi
Spot on Randy! I have noticed reading many of you... (show quote)



"Just a word to the wise, most libs attention span and reading comprehension is quite short"

Yes, it could also be they simply dont care because they are a bunch of narcissistic psychopaths.


Reply
Nov 10, 2017 17:50:40   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
Well said JW, and "HAPPY MARINE CORPS BIRTHDAY"!

Semper Fidelis



JW wrote:
Actually, eden, I used to be one of you... well, not actually one of you. I was, and still consider myself to be, a JFK Democrat. Like Pres. Reagan said, I never left the Democrat party, they left me. I know your kind well. What I described is hardly a fantasy Liberal and, were you to address that posting honestly, you would admit readily recognizing the type.

I do own a small caliber rifle but other than that, nothing. I do know how to use it, the Marine Corps taught me how but I am not a gun enthusiast. I am a liberty enthusiast. I am also an aficionado of logic. Liberty requires the ability to meaningfully oppose tyranny and logic tells me that disarming the lawful means only the lawless will be armed. If we can't defend ourselves against the lawless, how can we possibly defend against tyrants.

Rather than my actually being confined to a "little mental gun garrison", that is probably only how it looks from your little mental security bunker.
Actually, eden, I used to be one of you... well, n... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 10, 2017 17:53:16   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO
 
vettelover wrote:
"Just a word to the wise, most libs attention span and reading comprehension is quite short"

Yes, it could also be they simply dont care because they are a bunch of narcissistic psychopaths.

"Just a word to the wise, most libs attention... (show quote)



Reply
Nov 10, 2017 18:07:08   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
teabag09 wrote:
Back in the 70s at a party someone had loaded a joint with pcp. That is some really dangerous stuff. I was messed up for 3 days. That stuff is worst than blue dot. Mike


I tried it once in Jr High. Hated it! Tried it again many years later after I got out of the navy. Still hated it. That was enough.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 13 of 14 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.