Are you stupid? Look at the districts in Pennsylvania and Ohio, none of the districts were changed, only the outcome of the vote was changed, from voting for Democrats in the older election, and those same people in those exact same districts voted for President Trump in the last election.
You liberals like to ignore the fact that it took many, many millions of Democratic votes for Donald Trump for him to win the Presidency in those former blue states. Can you not recognioze that the districts in those two sates didn't change, but they were changed in North Carolina, but again too many Democrats voted for President Trump, and the districts have absolutely nothing to do with awarding of the states electorial votes, it has only to do with who won the majority total of all the individual votes in the entire state, no matter who won in each of the districts, and President Trump won in North Carolina because to many Democrats voted for him.
Each time you make your claim that redistricting won the election for President Trump, you prove your stupidity and ignorance, why can't you get it in your head that winning of districts didn't count in the Presidential election, but only the total vote in the entire state is what determined who got the electorial votes by winner of the popular vote in each state getting all the electorial votes in that state. President Trump won the popular vote in most of the states, while Hillary Clinton only won the popular vote in a very few states that had high population numbers in those few states. But you refuse to believe the facts because it disproves what you want to believe, that President Trump cheated in the election, which tens of thousands of investigators a whole lot smarter than you have been trying to prove for well over a year, but have admitted that they can find no proof of any wrong doing by President Trump in the election, or in collusion with any Russians. Accept the truth for a change and quit making yourself look so incredibly stupid.
Each political party elects their own electorial representatives of each state at their national conventions, and the political party that wins the popular vote in each state gets their electorial representatives to vote the electorial votes in that state, again it has absolutely nothing to do with the districts or gerrymandering by redistricting, but only by the winner of the popular vote in each state, his political party electorial representative gets to cast the electorial votes of that state, whioch is a republic method of choosing a President. Look closely at the districts in Pennsylvania and Ohio and compare each of the different election results that you have shown, and you'll see that none of the districts were changed in those two states, but only the way the people voted in those districts of those two states is what changed, but not one single district was changed, just the political party that the people in those exact same districts voted for.
You need help! You have it all wrong on how the electorial college works. Seek out someone who can explain it to you, because it has nothing to do with who wins the voting districts in each state, but only the majority of the popular vote in each state, not the total popular vote of the entire country. You have got it completely wrong and are making a fool of yourself. Get help and have someone explain to you how the electorial college really works.
Morgan wrote:
I just showed you the changes in redistricting for Ohio and Penn, are you blind?This is exactly how the votes switched from Democrats to Republicans, which also occurred in NC, by gerrymandering and through our Republican house in NC, thereby allowing Trump to win the electoral vote, but the majority of Democratic votes still outweighed the election for the governor contrary to the gerrymandering of red districts.
There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires Electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their states. Some states, however, require Electors to cast their votes according to the popular vote. These pledges fall into two categories—Electors bound by state law and those bound by pledges to political parties.
To win by popular vote we would not be a Republic and have no need for electoral representatives, which it is about time we did away with them since they no longer are used in a fair bipartisan way but instead as a manipulation to corrupt our voting process, though I know this doesn't matter to you, it is only about the win, ethics and fair play are not a consideration.
I just showed you the changes in redistricting for... (
show quote)